Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 29

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 29
584 Downloads

Israel Covenant Two Seedline Racial Identity

An Anglo-isaac-son Caucasian Culture Awareness Teaching Letter
 

THIS IS MY TWENTY-NINTH MONTHLY TEACHING LETTER and continues my third year of publication. With my last teaching letter, we covered more materials concerning the archaeological finds at Mari and Nuzi. These finds have added much in understanding the accounts of the Patriarchs of Genesis. Fifty to seventy-five years ago, many were trying to claim the Bible stories were simply myths handed down from generation to generation; that there were never actual persons such as Abraham, Haran, Nahor, Serug, Peleg, Terah. Since the discoveries of Mari and Nuzi, you don’t hear much about these “higher critics” anymore.

There probably are a few uninformed, preposterous, harebrained impostors still making such arguments, but Mari and Nuzi have shut the mouths of the majority of the so-called “experts.” There was another important archaeological find, discovered in 1974-1976, called Ebla, which we will be investigating shortly; if not in this letter, in the next one. This find also silenced the catcalls of the impudent sceptics. With these discoveries in archaeology, there is no more room for doubt that the Bible is true.

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 28

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 28
594 Downloads

ISRAEL Covenant Two Seedline Racial IDENTITY
 
AN ANGLO-ISAAC-SON CAUCASIAN CULTURE AWARENESS TEACHING LETTER

THIS IS MY TWENTY-EIGHTH MONTHLY TEACHING LETTER AND CONTINUES MY THIRD YEAR OF PUBLICATION. With my last teaching letter, I covered more material concerning the Phoenicians. I introduced the subject of the old “Princes’ Wall” in Egypt and the Egyptian story of Sinuhe. I continued with the 400 year blackout of the History of Israel in Egypt, and that there is only one known Egyptian written record of Israel ever being in there.

I really need to go back and make some comments concerning lesson #27. Willis Mason West, in his book Early Progress, pages 55-57 makes the statement: “Long before 1000 B.C., they (the Phoenicians) had far outrun Egypt and Babylon in trade.” This comment may be misleading. When we consider it was the descendants of Shem who originally occupied the Indus Valley, moved on to Egypt and setup a thriving civilization there. From Egypt, these Shemites moved on to the area known as Phoenicia. West’s statement may be correct in a sense, but more clarification is needed. West also comments about the Phoenicians: “Sometimes the boatmen used also a square sail, but only to run before the wind. (It was many hundreds of years before sailors learned to ‘tack.’)”

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 27

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 27
581 Downloads

AN ANGLO-ISAAC-SON CAUCASIAN CULTURE AWARENESS TEACHING LETTER

This is my twenty-seventh monthly teaching letter and continues my third year of publication. It is still my striving goal to make each succeeding letter to transcend, eclipse and outshine the ones preceding it. It is a very rigorous, difficult and demanding goal to try to meet each month, but meet it I will. In the last lesson, we got on the subject of the Phoenicians, which is probably one of the lesser-understood subjects of Israelite history. This is a subject, which we all need to get better acquainted with. I am trying to establish the groundwork for a series on Esau-Edom, and we need to take into account some secular history surrounding him to understand what was going on which affected him in his early days. Really, secular history is very much compatible with Bible history if we understand them both correctly. As we study this history, we may find the circumstances and lifestyles of the people living at that time entirely different from what we ever dreamed. Unless we can come to an understanding of the background stage for our investigation, we will miss much of the story. With these teaching letters, I am trying to bring you the best-selected articles of reference I can find. This way you can benefit, in a few minutes of reading, from what it took me many hours of research to find.

THE DEMISE OF EDOM

There is still more we should consider about the Phoenicians, and I did find a better-than-normal article in a book entitled Early Progress by Willis Mason West. Sometimes articles found in smaller history books are more concise and, therefore, give a better overall view on a subject. Quoting now from page 55-57:

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 26

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 26
567 Downloads

 

ISRAEL Covenant Two Seedline Racial IDENTITY Part 2

THIS IS MY TWENTY-SIXTH MONTHLY TEACHING LETTER, AND AS I SAID LAST MONTH, it is my striving goal to make each succeeding letter to transcend, eclipse and outshine the ones preceding it. It is a very rigorous, difficult and demanding goal to try to meet each month. As you will notice, with lessons #25 and #26, I have chosen to use a new format. In order to go to this new format with a smaller font size, it was necessary for me to do quite a bit of experimenting to find a font that was easy to read under these new circumstances. By using this new format, I can now send two letters in one mailing for 33 cents. I will be sending just as many teaching letters as in the past except I will be sending them bimonthly (that is every second month). By this new procedure, I will be able to cut my expenses almost in half while still bringing the same amount of information. I had more problems preparing lesson #25 than any lesson I have laboured with yet. I probably rewrote it at least six times before I was satisfied.

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 25

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 25
595 Downloads

THIS IS MY TWENTY-FIFTH MONTHLY TEACHING LETTER AND BEGINS MY THIRD YEAR OF PUBLICATION. It is my striving goal to make each succeeding letter to transcend, eclipse and outshine the ones preceding it. It is a very rigorous, difficult and demanding goal to try to meet each month. I established in the last lesson that Canaan, the son of Ham, was born of incest and pointed to a couple of scriptures to prove the point. It was a case of Ham looking upon his father’s nakedness, which turns out to be his mother’s nakedness.

It was hard to find anything of value in the various commentaries on the subject, as the writers seem to want to dance a jig around the topic trying to suppose it means a stepmother or a concubine, and in some instances this is what is intended. They also try to insinuate that these prohibitions were for the prevention of disease, and in some cases this might also be the purpose. In other cases they will just generalize that it was an immorality of some kind, or just skip over the verse as if it weren’t there.

I only found one comment from The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, page 99, which was worth quoting and I will repeat it here: “The nakedness of thy father. These laws were addressed to men. Hence this verse contains a prohibition not against incest between father and daughter, but against incest between son and mother only. The shame brought upon the mother was brought also upon the father. As they were of one flesh (Gen. 2:24), any act committed against the mother could be considered to have been likewise committed against the father.”

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 24

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 24
592 Downloads

THIS MINISTRY IS GROWING LIKE A SKYROCKET and I am going to have to make some changes. Therefore, this will be the last Watchman’s Teaching Letter with this format. Due to necessity, I need to cut expenses. To give you a brief financial report: about 3% of you are supporting the larger part of this ministry, with about another 3% carrying their own weight. At present, I have about 325 names on my list. The way it is growing, there could be close to 500 by the end of this year. (If there are any of you who are discarding my letters without reading them for some reason or other, please notify me so I may take you off of my mailing list, and thereby, I may be able replace you with someone else!)

I have been testing out different fonts and formats, and find that I can get all the present contents of my letters on two pages (front and back). By doing this, I will be able to send you two teaching letters in one mailing for 33¢. After this issue, you will receive my mailings every second month. This will allow me to cut my expenses by 50%, and you will still receive the same amount of teaching materials as usual. This is the twenty-fourth monthly teaching letter which I have produced since I started publishing them May 1998. Each year at the end of April, I bind the last 12 issues into a yearbook.

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 23

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 23
573 Downloads

THIS IS THE TWENTY-THIRD MONTHLY TEACHING LETTER since I started to publish them in May of 1998. In the last lesson, I presented some facts on the deadly doctrine of universalism. I am planning to bring you more on this subject in future lessons. Before I finished the last lesson, I ended up getting on the subject of Esau-Edom. With this lesson, I am going to go more in depth into the subject of Esau and his progeny.

I am not sure how long this will take, but I will continue until the topic is pretty well covered. Most people in Israel Identity seem to understand Edom better than they do Cain, but there is much more to understand about Esau than has been presented in the past. Before I get into this subject in detail, I will present some “facts” that are simply not true. There is nothing like getting some dead wood out of the way at the start. For those who believe the scriptures are without scribal errors, I will be showing you such an error of monumental proportions. These kinds of errors can be found in both the Old and New Testaments. Once we deal with the translation errors, then we must contend with the idioms. Unless we make an effort to understand the idioms, we will miss most of the message of Scripture. Scripture simply cannot be taken literally when idioms are involved. Every serious Bible student needs to get the small booklet Idioms Of The Bible Explained by George M. Lamsa published by Harper-Collins.

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 22

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 22
564 Downloads

THIS IS THE TWENTY-SECOND TEACHING LETTER SINCE I STARTED TO PUBLISH THEM IN MAY OF 1998. The first twenty-one letters were on the subject “Just Who Is This Patriarch, Judah?” The reason I continued that series so long is because there is more confusion on the subject of Judah than almost any other particular subject in Scripture. John Wilson and Edward Hine, the founders of Israel Identity, were not able to distinguish the difference between a member of the Tribe of Judah and a “Jew.” That same confusion has continued down to this very day. If you are one of those who are still bewildered on this question, you really need to contact me and request teaching letters #1 through #21. Once you study these comprehensive presentations, you will never again have any problem knowing whom the true Judahites are.

THE DEADLY DOCTRINE OF UNIVERSALISM

With this lesson, we are going to explore the unscriptural doctrine of “universalism.” We are going to start by examining a passage of Scripture, which many point out as authenticating such a tenet. This passage is found in Isaiah 56:4-8:

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 21

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 21
547 Downloads

THIS IS THE TWENTY-FIRST IN A SERIES OF TEACHING LETTERS. I would like to impress upon you again just how important this message of Israel Identity and understanding who the enemy of Israel is. We not only have to understand who the enemy is, but his motives and modus operandi (manner of operating or proceeding). While many have discovered the message of Israel Identity (which is great), yet, out of these, are some who have never come to a full understanding of who this all-important enemy of Israel is. There are some leaders in Israel Identity who go to long and loud efforts to proclaim there is no enemy, that the only enemy is the flesh. I would like to point out one example, which illustrates what is meant by my warning statement. The enemy (the “Jews”) are trying their damnedest to destroy Israel by getting them to intermix with other races. On page 37 of her book The Red Network, Elizabeth Dilling makes the following comment and you will realize upon reading it, that we have come a long way since the mid 1930’s:

The time was, when Methodism in its zeal for personal purity frowned upon dancing. Some Methodists nowadays (mid 1930’s) who are little opposed to dancing even in a church were a bit surprised, however, when several coloured men were introduced into circle dances at a dance given in the parish house of Tittle’s church and were thus forced upon the young white girls as partners. An M. E. Guide member whose daughter attended this dance reported that when she phoned the assistant pastor about this he said that these coloured men had been invited by Dr. Tittle himself (one of them (the coloured men) being the son of a classmate of his at college), who felt that it was now time that the young people learned to mingle with other races. (God created separate races, but Communism insists upon racial inter-mixture and inter-marriage.)

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 20

Clifton Emahiser – Letter No. 20
567 Downloads

THIS IS THE TWENTIETH IN A SERIES OF TEACHING LETTERS. With the last few teaching letters (13 through 19), I have been bringing you a series on the early Celtic church. If you don’t have all of these lessons, you will have missed part of this important story. You will need to contact me and get the missing issues. To understand the entire story of Judah, you will need all the lessons since #1.

Today the enemy is pulling every deceitful trick in order to destroy the White race. Recently they have run a miniseries (10 hours) on PBS called An American Love Story consisting of a white woman who married a black and all the problems they encountered with society with their (mamzer) mulatto daughter. Not only was this series broadcast for the original 10 hours, but it was repeated two times, so there was a total of 30 hours of television time.

The enemy is investing a lot of money into this sort of thing in order to promote multi-cultural race mixing. If we think race mixing is bad now, we haven’t seen anything yet! There was another subversive program broadcast over PBS called Not In Our Town. The object of this program was to incite communities to revolt against any kind of so-called “hate.” If you believe that the White people are Israel, you are automatically considered a member of a “hate” group.