IT is a remarkable proof of the ignorance of politicians in regard to matters of finance and, in consequence, of their unfitness to play the important part which of necessity they do in the conduct of the nation’s affairs, that neither the Conservatives, Labour nor Liberal Parties, not to mention the I. L. P., Communists and Common Wealth, have ever made any important statement of a policy in connection with the National Debt, nor shown the slightest indication that they realise that it is desirable to do anything about it.
BY THE MANNER IN WHICH A MAN IS KILLED WE CAN DETERMINE MUCH ABOUT THE REASONS FOR HIS DEATH. If we look at the past few important men found hanged, we can from the similarities found in each, they form a pattern that points both to the killers and why. These signposts are known to intelligence personnel as ‘tells’. Saddham Hussein fell out with the USA when he demanded oil payments be made in the Euro- not in the dollar, the group to find him was coincidentally called the 555’s, and Baghdad is on 33-33 N. latitude, a masonic line of power for human sacrifices so Saddham was hung. Tony Blair said at the time quote; ‘I stand four square behind the slaying of Saddham’ Tony’s election date was chosen to be 555, the same numbers as the Washington obelisk, and it’s interesting that the masonic initiation involves a noose round the neck for those who break the code of silence.
A CAREFUL WATCH ON THE EVENTS OF A QUARTER OF A CENTURY has convinced me that the vicious social developments of the nineteenth century were abnormal and were due to an artificial, and therefore removable, cause. That the cause is deep, insidious and subtle goes without saying : had it been obvious it would have been easily discovered.
Nowhere have I seen a full text of Magna Charta, which so illuminates the times of the Normans, save in a translation of a French History of England; the book came from Beckford’s library and was in a fisherman’s cottage. It is curious that in a translation of a Dutch work have I discovered the best historical account of the Bank of England. I refer to Bisschop’s Rise of the London Money Market. But for that work I must have apologized for the slenderness of the early history in this book. Bisschop’s work makes an apology unnecessary ; it is needless to multiply labour: where he leaves off the argument of this book commences.
In chapter iii, part I, Bisschop observes :–
“About this time  the Bank [of England] adopted the unfortunate theory that the note circulation should be contracted simultaneously with an efflux of gold from the Bank, in order to bring about a reflux of the specie withdrawn, owing to the scarcity of circulating medium created by this action. The author of this idea was Mr. Bosanquet.”
It is also noted:
“The theory, as amended [i.e., that the currency should vary with the foreign exchanges], found its way into the Bank Act of 1844.”
FOR YEARS THE AMERICAN COLONIES ENJOYED GREAT PROSPERITY they created their own money interest and debt free and taxation was small. The “English” Bankers were determined to bring the colonies under their sway. The colonists became exasperated with the repeated attempts to impose taxes on them and in 1775 war broke out and on the 4th July 1776 they proclaimed their own independence.
In his book ‘A Matter Of Life Or Debt’ Eric de Mere relates how on a visit to England, Benjamin Franklin was appalled at the poverty he saw everywhere. He was asked how he accounted for the great prosperity of the American colonies and he replied: “It is because we issue our own paper money. We call it Colonial Scrip and we issue enough to move all goods freely from the producers to the consumers and, as we create our own money, we control the purchasing power of money and have no interest to pay.” When this information reached the “English” Bankers they at once caused a Bill to be passed in Parliament forbidding the use’ of this Scrip Money.
Franklin stated that this “was the cause of the Revolution” and added, “The colonies would gladly have borne the little insignificant tax on tea and other articles, had it not been for the poverty amongst them caused by the “English” Bankers’ influence in Parliament.” The famous Parliamentarian Edmund Burke also confirmed this view.
HERE IS A SAD, BUT SO TYPICAL STORY AS TOLD TO ME RECENTLY BY MY VERY GOOD FRIEND, Paul [surname withheld for reasons of privacy]—
My dad has terminal cancer. He decided to transfer £10,000 from his bank account into mine as a gift and so I enquired at the counter of my bank (the Halifax) as to what the daily cash withdrawal limit was on my current account, without additional photo ID, because my photo ID was out of date.
The guy replied, “it’s £2000 per day.”
So I said “OK, thanks.”
The next day, I went back to the bank put my card into the reader at the counter and entered my PIN (personal identification number). The cashier then asked how much I’d like to withdraw, and I told her “£2000 please.”
The cashier then said. “Oh, do you have any photo ID?”
“No…” I replied, “—-but a staff member told me yesterday that I could withdraw £2000 per day without photo ID” I pointed out the guy and the cashier said, “that’s the manager.” I replied, “OK, great.”
Then she said “the computer has blocked the withdrawal request and flagged it up as possible fraud.” Of course, I was shocked!
“What’s the money for?” the cashier asked me.
Resisting the temptation to say ‘what’s it got to do with you,’ and in order to avoid being denied access to what was after all, my Own money, I was quite polite and replied “I’m not sure yet, I’ve not decided.”
“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” -Thomas Jefferson
AMERICANS, LIVING IN WHAT IS CALLED THE RICHEST NATION ON EARTH, seem always to be short of money. Wives are working in unprecedented numbers, husbands hope for overtime hours to earn more, or take part-time jobs evenings and weekends, children look for odd jobs for spending money, the family debt climbs higher, and psychologists say one of the biggest causes of family quarrels and breakups is “arguments over money.” Much of this trouble can be traced to our present “debt-money” system. Too few Americans realize why our founding fathers wrote into Article I of the U.S. Constitution: Congress shall have the Power to Coin Money and Regulate the Value Thereof.
They did this, as we will show, in prayerful hope it would prevent “love of money” from destroying the Republic they had founded. We shall see how subversion of Article I has brought upon us the horrors of which Jefferson had warned.
IT OUGHT TO BE OBVIOUS TO EVERY INVESTOR THAT BITCOIN WAS SET UP TO BE THE BANKSTER’S PREMIER CRYPTOCURRENCY as well as the currency foundation for the GREAT RESET.
Since January of 2021, Bitcoin has been pushed by all the major payment platforms, TBTF Big Banks, NYC investment banks and brokerage houses, and an assortment of other corporate behemoths across the USA.
After years of stealthy beta testing, Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum groupies are implementing an extraordinarily reckless roll-out of Bitcoin worldwide.
The power elite know that there’s no better way to exert absolute control over the masses than to foist a One World Currency on the entire planetary civilization. The only type of currency that will work — PRACTICALLY — is a digital currency. This is why the cryptocurrency Bitcoin was craftily “invented in 2008 by an unknown person or group of people using the name Satoshi Nakamoto”.
“BIBLE BILL” WILLIAM ABERHART, THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY PREMIER OF ALBERTA FROM 1935-1943, died just two weeks after he urged his listeners to “oppose, expose and resist by every means in your power this audacious and evil conspiracy by the Money Powers to set up a World Slave State.”
He noticed that since 1939, “there has been a steady stream of propaganda, carefully organized and well-financed, to win support for setting up a World Federation of Nations under an International authority.”
Aberhart- “There is absolutely no question about it that this plot, this evil conspiracy; to set up an international totalitarian dictatorship with control over every aspect of our lives and armed with overwhelming forces to impose their will upon us, can be traced to that small group of men which comprise International Finance….”
Everyone you meet is either a wolf or a sheep. (Wolf and The Sheep)
Wolf & The Sheep
Every government, army, church, or political organization is organized like a sheepfold or a wolf-den. The shootout at Ruby Ridge and the one in progress in Waco has everything to do with wolves and sheep, corporations and estates. America is witnessing the wolf-den’s attempt to stamp out the last remnants of sheep organization.
Corporations Organized Like Wolf-Packs
The Shepherd ordained the self-sufficient Biblical homestead for his sheep. It is there they were told to live. It is sheeps’ kingdom! The king of kings who rules the fold is the Shepherd.
Sheep, free of wolf-domination, live within a sheep-fold and rule their own farm-kingdoms, although they may have business partnerships in nearby trading centres. Wolves live tightly packed together in den-cities. The leader of the sheepfold is the Shepherd.
The leader of the wolf-den is the pack leader – the Alpha-wolf prince. The sheepfold lives by the unchanging “Law” of the Shepherd. The wolf-den lives under the constantly-changing “policy” of the Alpha-wolf.
Sheepfolds are ruled by Law from the “bottom-up” with every man a king. Wolf-dens are ruled by the alpha-wolf’s policy from the top down in a stair-step hierarchy. The sheepfold is composed of “sole ownerships” and “partner-ships.” The wolf-den is “corporate” in structure and operates under “general policy” outlined in the 10 planks of the 1848 Manifesto! .
FARMERS AND BUSINESSMEN TALK FREQUENTLY ABOUT “MAKING MONEY”. But this common statement is most misleading. When a farmer grows a bag of potatoes he does not at the same time create a money equivalent. Farmers and businessmen obtain money from someone else in exchange for what they have grown or produced. It is true that some people attempt to make money in the form of notes, but if caught they finish in prison tor counterfeiting! Who, then, does make a community’s money? How is it made and controlled? A modern economy is controlled almost completely by financial policy. There is practically no barter. All exchanges of goods and services take place through money. No understanding of the problems of an economy, including inflation, is possible without an understanding of the creation and control of money.
The essential feature of any form of money is its acceptability. The psychological factor is all-important. Counterfeited $20 bills act as money just so long as they are accepted by those handling them. Throughout history many different forms of money have been used by different people— shells, different types of stones, metals made into different types of coins, paper money of numerous sizes and types. But so long as people believe that they can at any time obtain goods and services for any type of money, then they accept it and it acts as money Money has no value in itself at all. A million dollars is useless on a desert island. The first essential in examining the money question is to stop regarding it as an end in itself, to realize that money is a man-made system and that the system can be changed by man. To worship a man-made money system is a form of superstition. It is not money which is the root of all evil, as some maintain, but the love of money.
PEOPLE are increasingly aware that there is a great deal wrong with the world, and that every aspect of life seems to have deteriorated since World War II. Although it is now obvious that this deterioration could not have happened by chance, the catch-phrase: “I don’t believe in the Conspiracy Theory” is frequently heard if the role of the international bankers is questioned, while people who touch on sensitive matters are denounced as “anti-Semitic”.
We could begin by asking: just what is meant by the term “anti-Semitism”? Strictly speaking it should mean some form of attack on people who are Semitic by those who are not Semitic. Currently it is being used in a quite different way: as an offensive weapon, based on a falsehood. To understand this use of the term we must consider the historic background.
AS THE FINANCIAL CRISIS WORSENS IN AMERICA and across the globe, people want to know: “When did it all start”? In fact, the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank in the United States is a spin off of the Bank of England, established in the 1694. And, as the earl of Anglesey presciently observed in 1658: “It is dangerous to the peace of the kingdom when it shall be in the power of half a dozen or half a score of rich, discontented or factious persons to make [an accumulation] of our own coin and bullion beyond the seas and leave us in want of money when it shall not be in the king’s power to prevent it.”
From A.D. 757 to his death in 791, the great King Offa (above) ruled the kingdom of Mercia, one of the seven autonomous kingdoms of the Anglo-Saxon heptarchy.
Offa was a wise and able administrator and a kindhearted leader, though he could be hard on his enemies. He established the first monetary system in England (as distinguished from Romano-Keltic Britain). On account of the scarcity of gold, he used silver for coinage and as a store of wealth. The standard unit of exchange was a pound of silver, divided into 240 pennies. The pennies were stamped with a star (Old English stearra), from which the word “sterling” is derived. In 787 Offa introduced a statute prohibiting usury: charging of interest on money lent.
DID EVER A MAN OF WEALTH have more in panegyrics than that conquering money hero of these present times, J. Pierpont Morgan? Long since, his fame was trumpeted to the four quarters of the earth. His copious praises have been chanted with an extravagance that in the case of anyone else would have been rejected as turgid. Most mighty patriot and unexcelled public-spirited citizen, great financier and noble philanthropist, marvellous “captain of industry” and conservator of the social structure, friend of kings, and king among men — these are but a selected few of the apotheoses too often seriously accepted by the people at large. One writer in particular, raptly reaching up for a large expression of homage, has touched almost the climax of adoration in emblazoning him, “Morgan the Magnificent.”1
MORGAN’S EXQUISITE REPUTATION.
Many a hired or acquiescent scribe, plying well his trade, has reeled out his effusions ; and the total of these has produced a certain settled, aggregate public opinion which looks up to Morgan with unabated awe and adoration. In the firmament of wealth no man shines out more dazzlingly than he.
THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WERE THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR, a secretive society created and sponsored by an even more secret society known as the “Priory De Scion” during the time of the Christian Crusades to recapture the Holy Lands from Muslim control.
The “Priory De Scion” has had considerable historical influence in Europe from the time of the Crusades to the present. The reason that most persons have not heard of the “Priory De Scion” is that they work secretly behind the scenes.
Christopher Columbus was a secret member of the “Priory De Scion” and on his voyage of discovery to the “New World,” his Flag Ship had the Templar Cross emblem on the Main Sail. This was unusual because the Templars had been outlawed by that time in history.
A list of the “Grand Masters of the Priory De Scion” would include such notables as Leonardo Da Vinci and Sir Isaac Newton. This secret organization still wields extraordinary secret power in modern Europe and has exercised a large influence in creating the present European Union.2
The Knights Templar were required to take oaths of poverty and chastity to become members. Their stated mission was to guard the roads to the Holy Land. Their popularity became so great that they became a political force with which even kings had to reckon.
A strong offence is often the best defence. This truism, applicable to football! Contests and military engagements, is likewise pertinent in the defence of Christianity from mounting attacks launched against Christian principles and practices.
Banning prayer and Bible reading while permitting immoral sex education and humanistic values clarification courses in public schools, promotion of abortion on demand and homosexuality; showing of such sacrilegious films as Hair, Godspell and Nasty Habits; and the widespread dissemination of pornographic movies and reading materials are only a few of the many tactics employed to erode and eventually destroy Christian foundations of Western Civilisation.
THE LEGALIZED CRIME OF BANKING is a simple story of The Federal Reserve System, dealing principally with the unconstitutional creation of money and the control of credit by private corporations. The author suggests a concrete, simple solution, which Congress could employ, which would make the transition from private banking to the Treasury without injuring anyone enjoying a constitutional right, or without upsetting our normal course of trade, industry, and agriculture. (From the back cover of the original book)
The Pauper and The Rich Man
The pauper (the Federal Reserve Bank) with assets of $52 billion with no productive know how, and less than 100,000 stockholders, loaned the rich man (The United States Government) with well over $350 billion in physical assets plus $250 billion in productive capacity and know how, with 170 million stockholders, $300 billion to fight World War II. Can you imagine the greatest corporation on earth, with 170 million stockholders and assets running over $600 billion, turning to a corporation with less than 100,000 stockholders and assets of only $52 billion to borrow money?
Can you imagine Rockefeller saying to his chauffeur: “Tom, I am transferring my personal chequeing account, which is around $1 billion, to your account; you may spend it as you please, provided that when I need some cash, you will hand it to me. Of course, I will give you my note for cash I receive and pay interest on the note.” Well, that is exactly what Congress did in 1913 when it passed the Reserve Act. To fight World War II, we gave the bankers of the United States $300 billion in U.S. Bonds that we might use the Nation’s credit. In addition, we permitted them to take a credit of $300 billion in their reserve accounts.
This gave them $2 trillion 100 billion bank credit. These credits are to bankers what your deposit credits on their books are to you. They can lend it, or buy investment obligations-it is cash to them! So adding the $300 billion in Bonds to their bank credit, we find that the bankers (the then paupers) came out of World War II $2 trillion 400 billion richer than when we went into the War. The United States Government (the then rich man), thanks to the stupidity and venality of her sons (congressmen), and newspapers and journals, came out of the War $300 billion in debt! And, dear reader, that fable happens to be true.
Who has dared to publish challenging books on money, exemplifying those qualities of rugged and courageous man hood so essential in the ongoing of a free republic, in which no man should be afraid to speak when he feels it his duty to speak. He has spoken through the many books which he has published, proving that a free press, in his opinion, is the guardian genius of a just, honest, and humane democracy. He has felt with Lincoln that “To sin by silence when they know they should protest, makes cowards of men.” In appreciation of him as a publisher, I dedicate this book.
For the attention of Mr Nicholas Catton
London SW1P 3AG March 17th 1993
Dear Mr Catton, Ref: ‘From Miner To Major’ 13/1/1993.
Thank you for your letter of March 2, needless to say, it seems to be in reply to an entirely different letter to the one I sent to Mr Major. However, we have managed to obtain confirmation from your Treasury colleague, Anthony Nelson; that the options set out in my letter of January 13th 1993, entitled “Miner to Major” are indeed workable. His evidence, endorses our contention that the cost-free, sustainable alternatives to pit & plant closures, mentioned to the Prime Minister do in fact exist:
The only issue still remaining unanswered, is whether these genuine problem-solving alternatives, known of, and now confirmed by H.M. Treasury, are being denied to us by design or natural ignorance. Perhaps you could be more forthcoming in this regard? Mr Nelson’s letter of February 22nd, Ref: 47a/2 est.vd/cdoc/h….., inadvertently lets this particular cat out of the bag, i.e., that Parliament could, if it so desired, finance or subsidise – Free of cost and inflation – all government spending; including Public-works; Public Health, Social-Services, Public transport, the Armed Forces and the hard pressed police, fire, and ambulance services, through sound, socially responsible funding, which exposes Mr Heseltine’s lie, where he says: “There Are No Cost Free Options”. [TANKCO]
LINES OF CREDIT: ROPES OF BONDAGE is about the financiers, their fellow conspirators and the plot to destroy Western Christian civilization. It was written for the concerned American – not for the skeptic.
In likelihood, the skeptic will, without ever having read it, dismiss this – with a roll of the eyes and wave of the hand while at the same time declaring it to he outrageous fiction – just another attempt to promote the “conspiracy theory of history.”
Quite honestly, I did not write LINES OF CREDIT: ROPES OF BONDAGE with a hope or intention of convincing those “doubting Thomases” who, unlike the Apostle Thomas who finally believed, will continue to deny the existence of the conspiracy in spite of overwhelming and conclusive evidence to the contrary. Actually these skeptics are important to the conspirators; they are the “useful idiots” so cherished by Lenin.
Primarily, this work was written for anyone who suspects that there is much more to modern European and American history than can be learned from the standard and approved history textbooks. This work is written for the God-fearing citizen who finds it difficult to believe that our country fought two world wars and spilled the blood of our sons supposedly to make the world free for all mankind, when in actuality we made it possible for two bloodiest empires in history to enslave over a fourth of the world’s people in godless communism.
THE FINAL DEDUCTIONS in this treatise, and in particular the relating of the Final Act of Bretton Woods to the financial policy which led to the foundation and perversion of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, are the author’s own, for which he must not fasten any responsibility upon his authorities. Those readers, however, who wish to check the facts from which the deductions are made may be recommended to the following works: “All These Things” and “The Truths About The Slump,” by A. N. Field; “The Bankers’ Conspiracy” and “A Fraudulent Standard,” by Arthur Kitson; “Analysis of Usury” and “The Modern Idolatry,” by Jeffrey Mark; “The Mystical Body of Christ and the Reorganisation of Society,” by Father Denis Fahey; “The Money Illusion,” by Professor Irving Fisher; “The Two Nations” and “The Breakdown of Money,” by Christopher Hollis; “Post-War Monetary Stabilisation,” by Professor Gustav Cassel; “America Conquers Britain,” by Ludwell Denny; “The Brief for the Prosecution,” by Major C. H. Douglas; and the volume is of Hansard covering the debate on the Loan Agreement. Another book, “The Economics of Human Happiness,” by W. Collin Brooks, although it draws none of the conclusions here set down, and indeed draws some which are at variance with them, is nevertheless well worth reading because of the wonderful lucidity with which its author deals with perversions of the monetary system.
IT IS NECESSARY TO REDUCE, IF NOT DESTROY, the tendency of Jewish people to practice a very great number of activities that are harmful to civilization and to public order in society in all the countries of the world.— Napoleon Bonaparte, 1808. (Quoted by Stephen Mitford Goodson in A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind, 2014, p. 54)
If usury remains intact, then the world must brace itself for a depression, similar to the Dark Ages, which will last for many centuries.
— Stephen Goodson, 2013
We live in the dark, convinced by our public media and our insincere leaders that we are heroes and freedom fighters. In reality the opposite is true: we are the plunderers, the ravagers, deceiving ourselves to do the dirty work of the manipulators who have twisted our minds with trinkets and false accounts of the people we kill and the countries we ruin in order to steal their treasures.
And the saddest part — the punch line that proves how stupid we are — is that we never profit from the invasions we are cynically ordered to conduct.
The bounty always goes to the swindlers pulling the strings, and we, as the agents of banditry, time and again, are always left to suffer the same fate of the people we have robbed when we are robbed ourselves, of not only our treasures, but of our dignity, shortly before we are robbed of our lives.
Clifford Hugh Douglas was born in 1879. He was educated at Cambridge University, and was an engineer. Douglas developed a view of the role of money, and a monetary system, which he called Social Credit. He presented his ideas to the Canadian government in 1923 before the Committee of the House of Commons on Banking and Industry in 1923.
His books, including “Social Credit”, influenced the Farmers Co-operative (the UFA) in Canada, to which Douglas became a financial adviser in 1927. From those beginnings, the Alberta Social Credit Party was formed in 1935, with popular educator and radio preacher William Aberhart as its leader. That party came to power and, in 1935, Major Douglas became the chief reconstruction adviser to Premier Aberhart. Differences between Douglas’ views and the party’s policies resulted in Douglas’ resignation as adviser. Douglas published many books on his views concerning money, banking, and the globally influential and powerful. His other books include Economic Democracy (1920), The Monopoly of Credit (1931), The Use of Money (1935), and The Alberta Experiment: An Interim Survey (1937). Douglas died in 1952.
FOR two years past the author has awaited the auspicious moment for presenting to the public his views upon the oppressions and abuses practiced by corporations and combinations of men who are apparently getting a controlling influence over the commerce, finances, and government of the country. Recent action on the part of the people has convinced him that his opportunity has come, and he embraces it. He has aimed to present a true history of the operations of the different monopolies.
Since he began the preparation of his work, some events have taken place not noticed by him. Oakes Ames and James Brooks, two prominent characters among railroad men, and whom he has had occasion to name, have died. Some changes in the laws of congress have been made affecting the interests of corporations. The law requiring the secretary of the treasury to retain but one-half of the earnings from the government of the Pacific roads to apply on the interest due to government on subsidy bonds, has been repealed, and he may now retain and apply the whole amount. Suit has also been brought against the Union Pacific company because of its dishonest practices.
On the whole, however, combinations of corporations, and other rings and organizations, at war with the best interests of the people, have acquired new strength and more power within the last few months.
The reader will notice the fact, that while the author has quoted liberally from the statutes and resolves of congress to show the great privileges and powers conferred upon railroad companies, and familiarized the reader with their financial and other transactions for a clear understanding of their manner of doing business, he has not pretended to give a full history; satisfying himself with such chapters as would place before the public the true character of these monopolies.
The author has sought to present truthful statements of matters in connection with the various interests now so hostile to the rights of the people, and he believes he has embodied the facts as they exist. D.C.C. MUSCATINE, IOWA, July 28, 1873.
IN responding to Reed concerning the Jewish connection to common law evolution, I almost missed another direct connection between the invasion of William the Conqueror of the Anglo-Saxons in 1066, and a very direct connection to the then existing banking power in Europe. As the history below shows, the connection between William and the banking cartel then existing was quite direct.
Back during mid-twentieth century, historian Max DiMont wrote two very large and acclaimed treatises on Jewish history. His study shows quite a few direct ties between common law and Torah as well as Talmud. For example:
“It was William the Conqueror, bastard son of Duke Robert of Normandy, and the daughter of a tanner, who brought England into the mainstream of European history… he viewed his new Anglo-Saxon subjects as swilling swine, crawling with lice, incapable of developing an economy… William brought over a contingent of French Jews to establish commerce and banking for the country…”
THIRTEEN FAMILIES EFFECTIVELY CONTROL THE CENTRAL BANKS of all the hard-currency countries. These “control banks” all practice FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING, which is perfectly legal in the US. Fractional reserve banking means that the bank is only required to hold on hand the small fraction of money (5%) that is needed to cover the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed. Moneys deposited in accounts go into a reserve upon which credit can be issued. In the US credit can be issued to seven times the reserve, in international banks (off shore establishments) twenty times the reserve can be issued as credit. It is important to understand this concept in order to understand the larger picture.
In the mid 1970’s, the final phase of System 2000, a “global creditors’ unilateral totalitarian plan” was put into effect. A Pentagon official and three other US officials went to the Prime Minister of Nigeria and offered him fifty million dollars in cash to double the price of light crude oil. Nigeria is one of only two countries in the world that produce light crude, which is an extremely pure form of oil whose price sets the standard for all other forms of crude oil.
Armed with the knowledge that, because of their deal with Nigeria, the price of Mid-east oil was about the skyrocket, the international bankers went to the Arabs and said, “We will send the price of crude oil as high as you want if you will promise to invest some of the money you make in the United States.”
Q: Can you tell us something about your involvement in the Swiss banking business?
A: I have worked for Swiss banks for many years, I was designated as one of the top directors of one of the biggest Swiss banks. During my work, I was involved in the payment … in the direct payment in cash to a person who killed the president of a foreign country. I was in the meeting where it was decided to give this cash money to the killer. This gave me dramatic headaches and troubled my conscience. It was not the only case that was really bad, but it was the worst.
It was a payment instruction on order of a foreign secret service, written by hand, giving the order to pay a certain amount to a person who killed the top leader of a foreign country. And it was not the only case. We received several such hand-written letters coming from foreign secret services giving the order to pay out cash from secret accounts to fund revolutions or for the killing of people. I can confirm what John Perkins has written in his book, “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man”. There really exists just (such a) system, and Swiss banks are involved in such cases.
Q: Perkins’ book is also translated and available in Russian. Can you tell us which bank it is and who was responsible?
A: It was one of the top three Swiss banks at that time and it was the president of a country in the Third World. But I don’t want to give out too many details because they will find me very easily if I say the name of the president and the name of the bank. I will risk my life.
MAYER AMSCHEL ROTHSCHILD, the founder of the Rothschild fortune, at the time of his death in 1812, created a trust of his estate, by will, for the elevation of the Jewish race and the establishment of a Jewish World Empire. The cardinal principles of the trust were secrecy, that the estate should be kept intact as a unit, that the heirs and their heirs should have only a communal interest in it, and that the estate as a whole should be governed by the eldest son of the eldest son unless a majority of the heirs determined otherwise.
The estate has been preserved and managed since his death as a unit in pursuance of the provisions of his will. There are now several hundred heirs, for the family is a prolific one, but the estate is communal and still under the management of one head. So far as known, the provisions of the wills of the members of the family still contain in substance the directions of the founder of the fortune.
History affords but meager information regarding the rulers of this fortune and the extent of it, because of their secretive methods. No inventory has ever been filed and no division has ever been sought by any heir.
Most of the histories of the Rothschild family are either Jewish or strongly pro-Jewish. While they are extravagant in praise of the virtues of the different members of the Rothschild family, they are rather meager in facts. The facts herein related have been gleaned from many sources and are based on information believed to be reliable.
We do not know the extent of the founder’s fortune at the time of his death in 1812, nor do we know the present magnitude of it, but apparently it represents about one-half of the wealth of the world.
This huge fortune has been devoted with great shrewdness and energy to the purpose of exploiting the Gentiles in all the countries of the globe. The methods employed are the manipulation of currencies, speculations on the exchanges, and wars.
The Rothschilds by these operations profit enormously because they have the power by virtue of their immense wealth and political power, to put prices up or down at pleasure. It is for these reasons that we have had most of our wars and depressions. The protocols and the communist’s code, which are identical in purpose and intent, represent their plan for the conquest of the world. Both of these codes were published subsequent to Mayer Amschel’s death, but some of the protocols appear to have been in existence prior thereto. They, however, represent his principles as shown by all that we know of him.
This book is not written in a spirit of anti-Semitism, for I have Jewish friends that I do not wish to injure. It is written in the hope that it may be helpful in solving our Jewish problem peaceably and by appropriate legislation. To the extent that the remedies herein suggested may contribute to that end they will be helpful to the Jews as well as to the balance of us, for it is certain that the people of this country will never meekly submit to slavery.
In writing and publishing this book I am inspired by no other motive than to render a service to my country. I realize that I am taking some risk in doing so—at least that of persecution. Adequate provision has been made for the publication and distribution of this book regardless of the author.
Information about the arms of the City of London from the earliest times to the present day is given below.
The earliest specific mention of the armorial bearings of the City of London appears on 17 April 1381, when it was ordered that the old mayoralty seal should be broken as it was “ill-befitting the honour of the City”. St Thomas Becket and St Paul featured in the design of the old seal and they were also incorporated in the new one. A contemporary description records that it was commissioned by the Mayor, William Walworth, and depicted “beneath the feet of the said figures a shield of the arms of the said City … with two lions guarding the same”. The shield contains a cross charged with a dagger or sword in its first quarter and is similar to the modern design.
This evidence means that the popular belief that the dagger or sword represents the weapon with which Walworth killed the rebel, Wat Tyler, during the Peasants’ Revolt cannot be true. The seal was designed and executed several months before Tyler’s death in June 1381 and the sword almost certainly represents the sword of St Paul.
Abstract: The Bank of Amsterdam, founded in 1609, was the first public bank to offer accounts not directly convertible to coin. As such, it can be described as the first true central bank. The debut of central bank money did not result from any conscious policy decision, however, but instead arose almost by accident, in response to the chaotic monetary conditions during the early years of the Dutch Republic. This paper examines the history of this momentous development from the perspective of modern monetary theory.
IN 1913, THE U.S. CONGRESS PASSED A BILL CALLED THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT. This bill allowed an independent, non-government group to privatise, and take control of America’s monetary system. The Federal Reserve Bank’s name was chosen by this group so as to deceive the American people into believing that the Federal Reserve was a branch of the U.S. Government.
This privately held monopoly continues even today to give enormous power to a handful of international bankers, non-Americans, to issue America’s money, to set interest rates, to finance endless wars, and to enslave the American citizens, and the other nations of the world in a state of perpetual debt. This debt based monetary system is what has destroyed the American economy, and has brought with it depressions, and recessions for several generations. This will continue, until the Federal Reserve, and the fractional reserve lending practices of the centralized banks ceases to exist.
Facts About the Federal Reserve
● The Federal Reserve is a privately owned for profit corporation.
● The Federal Reserve has no reserves.
The name was created prior to the Federal Reserve Act, which was passed in 1913. This was done to make Americans believe the U.S. banking system operated in the public interest. The Federal Reserve is a private bank owned by private shareholders, and runs purely for private profits. The result has been the creation of a debt based monopoly that must be paid for by the American tax payer. As of this writing, the U.S. national debt is nearly twenty trillion dollars. See: The U.S. Debt Clock for an update as to how much this debt has ballooned.
THE MISPLACED REVERENCE TO THE ILL FORMULATED US CONSTITUTION and hidden subjugation back to the City of London is one aspect of history that is not taught in government schools or discussed in institutes of higher education.
This subject is probably new to most observers of the legacy from the Founding Father’s biggest mistake. Regular readers of BREAKING ALL THE RULES are familiar with the arguments made in the essays, In the beginning: Let there be the Articles of Confederation and Articles of Confederation was Preferable. Now the case for the betrayal of the purpose of the American Revolution needs to be explored.
Cited on the US Constitution Gave Legal Ownership and Control of the United States to London site is an assessment by Michael Edward.
In this volume the author endeavours to give an accurate history of the present National Bank System of currency, including an account of the first United States Bank, both of which were borrowed from Great Britain by those statesmen who, like the father of Sir Robert Peel, believed that a national debt was the source of prosperity.
It is believed that the facts adduced in the following pages will be productive of some good, in pointing out the immense evils lurking in that system of banking, a system which has produced panics at will, and which is the active abettor of the stock gamblers, railroad wreckers, and those industrial tyrants of modern times, the enormously overcapitalized and oppressive trusts.
It is sought to point out the great dangers of delegating purely government powers to these greedy monopolists, by which they are enabled to organize a money trust, far more tyrannical than all the other combinations now in existence; and by which they absolutely defy the authority that endowed them with corporate life.
The issue between these banks and the people will be joined in the near future, and the greatest struggle the world ever witnessed will take place between the usurping banks on the one hand and the people on the other.
In the nature of things, unjustly acquired power of man over man generally rises to such heights of arrogance as to eventually create a public opinion that will grind tyranny of every form to atoms, hence The Coming Battle that will surely take place in the near future and the victory that will be won by justice will be the noblest events in American history.
NOTHING, they say, is more certain but death, and nothing more uncertain than the time of dying; yet we can always fix a period beyond which man cannot live, and within some moment of which he will die.
We are enabled to do this, not by any spirit of prophecy, or foresight into the event, but by observations of what has happened in all cases of human or animal existence. If then
any other subject, such, for instance, as a system of finance, exhibits in its progress a series of symptoms indicating decay, its final dissolution is certain, and the period of it can be calculated from the symptoms it exhibits.
Those who have hitherto written on the English system of finance (the funding system) have been uniformly impressed with the idea of its downfall happening some time or other. They took, however, no data for that opinion, but expressed it predictively, or merely as opinion, from a conviction that the perpetual duration of such a system was a natural impossibility. It is in this manner that Dr. Price has spoken of it; and Smith, in his Wealth of Nations, has spoken in the same manner; that is, merely as opinion without data.
The progress, says Smith, is of the enormous debts, which at present oppress, and will in the long-run most probably ruin, all the great nations of Europe, (he should have said governments) has been pretty uniform. But this general manner of speaking, though it might make some impression, carried with it no conviction.
It is not my intention to predict any thing; but I will shew from data already known, from symptoms and facts which the English funding system has already exhibited publicly, that it will not continue to the end of Mr. Pitt’s life, supposing him to live the usual age of a man. How much sooner it may fall, I leave to others to predict.
Let financiers diversify systems of credit as they will, it is nevertheless true, that every system of credit is a system of paper money. Two experiments have at ready been had upon paper money; the one in America, the other in France. In both those cafes the whole capital was emitted, and the whole capital, which in America was called continental money, and in France assignats, appeared in circulation; the consequence of which was, that the quantity became so enormous, and so disproportioned to the quantity of population, and to the quantity of objects upon which it could be employed, that the market, if I may so express it, was glutted with it, and the value of it fell.
Fabian was excited as he once more rehearsed his speech for the crowd certain to turn up tomorrow. He had always wanted prestige and power and now his dreams were going to come true. He was a craftsman working with silver and gold, making jewellery and ornaments, but he became dissatisfied with working for a living. He needed excitement, a challenge, and now his plan was ready to begin. For generations the people used the barter system. A man supported his own family by providing all their needs or else he specialised in a particular trade. Whatever surpluses he might have from his own production, he exchanged or swapped for the surplus of others.
Fabian was excited…
Market day was always noisy and dusty, yet people looked forward to the shouting and waving, and especially the companionship. It used to be a happy place, but now there were too many people, too much arguing. There was no time for chatting – a better system was needed.
Generally, the people had been happy, and enjoyed the fruits of their work.
Market day was always noisy and dusty…
In each community a simple Government had been formed to make sure that each person’s freedoms and rights were protected and that no man was forced to do anything against his will by any other man, or any group of men.
This was the Government’s one and only purpose and each Governor was voluntarily supported by the local community who elected him.
However, market day was the one problem they could not solve. Was a knife worth one or two baskets of corn? Was a cow worth more than a wagon … and so on. No one could think of a better system.
Fabian had advertised, “I have the solution to our bartering problems, and I invite everyone to a public meeting tomorrow.”
This was the Government’s one and only purpose
MOST ORTHODOX HISTORY that is crammed into the heads of our children is one long list of contradictions. There is no real background to our social development because the main underlying factors have been completely ignored.
The part played by the money system in the growth of society has been tremendous; yet how many of our historians mention it?
We teach our children about the development of the British Commonwealth of Nations, although the real basis of this growth has been either neglected of distorted, while the development of that powerful, private and anti-social institution, the Bank of England, is very rarely mentioned.
If we are really desirous of preserving and developing British culture, it is essential that we attempt to gain at. least an elementary knowledge of the attack which was launched against the British people at the time of Cromwell.
It is significant that the introduction of what has been termed a “spurious Whig culture,” marked the origin of the present banking racket in Britain. This cultural and financial attack has been going ever since, although there is sound reason to believe that the enemy is at last being turned on both flanks However, as yet, there is no sign of a rout in the enemy’s ranks. Even the London “Times,” one of the chief mouthpieces of the financial oligarchy, offered the following criticism of “Whigism” in its issue of August 4, 1840:
“There is certainly in ‘Whigism’ an inherent propensity to tyranny; and of all the methods which tyranny ever invented for sucking out the essential vitality of free institutions, without appearing materially to touch their forms, this centralising system is the most plausible and the most pernicious. . . If it shall be fully carried out, British liberty … will rest no longer on the possession of constitutional power by the people, but upon the sufferance of a majority of those who, for the time being, may call themselves the people’s representatives.”
Have you been cheated?
In order for any contract to be valid, there must be ‘full disclosure’, ‘good faith’, ‘valuable consideration’, and ‘clean hands’. Here is what the banks advertise: “Come to our bank. We have money to loan you”. Is this really what happens?
Did you really get a loan when you contracted to borrow money from the bank to pay for your home? Or was it just an exchange (your note for cash), but the bank called it a loan? Or did two loans occur?
When you entered into a loan contract with a bank, you signed a note or contract promising to pay the bank back, and you agreed to provide collateral that the bank could seize if you did not repay the loan. This contract supposedly qualified you to receive the bank’s money. But did the bank provide ‘full disclosure’ of all of the terms of this agreement? Read the following and decide for yourself if the bank was acting in ‘good faith’, that you received ‘valuable consideration’, and that your ‘signature’ on that agreement is valid.
Bankers want you to believe that depositors deposit money at banks, banks lend the money to borrowers and the borrowers repay the money and the money is returned to the depositors who funded the loan. If you think this is how American or Canadian banking works, you have been lied to and deceived.
The fact is the economics of today’s banking system is similar to stealing, counterfeiting and swindling and that is why the bankers cannot explain the loan details or answer specific questions. Bankers are terrified that the details might be exposed in public court.
This work is divided into three parts:—
Part I gives a History of the Rise of the London Money Power.
Part II proves that this Imperialism of Capital — the London Money Power — is foretold in prophecy, under the symbol of the Great Red Dragon.
Part III gives the Remedy for the industrial evils that afflict our country. (And, I did not scan this part)
There are many persons, perhaps, who will be deeply interested in Part I, and Part III, Who will feel but little interest in the prophetic portion of the work . The work is so arranged that all such persons can skip Part II, and pass from Part I to Part II, without any break in the connection of thought: though they will miss the most striking delineations of the character and the activities of the Money Power.
On the other hand, those who are interested in the prophetic aspect of the work, will find its structure in proper logical arrangement as a prophetic exposition; since it is necessary to present the history of the Money Power, before the symbols of prophecy can be applied to it.
This work is the outgrowth of a life of thought, largely directed to the study of Prophecy, History, and Political Economy. Indeed, the work is the product of original thought. Its historical portion is the history of an Imperialism whose existence has been hitherto unrecognised—Its remedy is based upon principles of Political economy that have never before been presented to the world.—Its Prophetic Exposition is part of a System of Prophetic Interpretation that is entirely new . The Author may therefore claim the indulgence due to a pioneer, whose movement is over a pathway un-smoothed by the progress of earlier thought.
THE SEVEN HEADS AND TEN HORNS APPEAR THREE TIMES IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION: 1) In the 12th chapter, upon the body of the Great Red Dragon; 2) In the 13th chapter, upon the body of the Beast like a leopard, that rises up out of the Sea; and 3) In the 17th chapter, on the body of the Scarlet-coloured Beast, that has a Woman upon its back, called the Beast from the Pit.
In all cases, the seven heads have the same signification.
The following is the text of the passage where the Seven Heads and Ten Horns appear upon the body of the Dragon:—
“And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.” Rev. xii: 3.
The following is the text of the passage where these Seven Heads and Ten Horns appear upon the body of the Beast from the Sea:—
“And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.” Rev. xiii I.:
In the 17th chapter of Revelation, where the Seven Heads and Ten Horns appear upon the body of the Beast from the Pit, they are elaborately described by the angel to John. The following is the text of the passage:—
“So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon scarlet-coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
“And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abomination and filthiness of her fornication: and upon her forehead was a name written, mystery, Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth.
In 1861, when the resources of the country seemed exhausted, when the last dollar had been expended, when it was found that the whole volume of the national currency was inadequate to meet current expenses, when our imperial cousins across the deep, instead of coming to our aid, had already recognized the belligerency of our foes, and stood, cat-like, ready to pounce upon the fragments of a shattered Republic, E.G. Spaulding and Erastus Corning, of New York, and Samuel Hooper, of Massachusetts, were appointed a sub-committee under the House Committee of Ways and Means to devise some plan of prosecuting the war, perpetuating the Union and paying current expenses. The country was rich in patriotism, men and munitions of war. All that was needed was money, or a medium of exchange, to move the armies and purchase supplies. Under the urgent pressure of necessity the best and ablest thought and talent of the nation were brought into requisition. A happy thought conceived the idea of applying the “nation’s wealth to the nation’s needs.”
“The triumphant nation of tomorrow will be that which defeats the others on the economic field, by reorganising the conditions of human toil, and by bringing more justice and happiness to mankind.” —“Zola” in “Truth” Page 171.
In days of old the feudal baronage sallied forth with sword and spear to levy toll upon terrorised producers. They were masters of highways and waterways, and in the name of their overlordship exacted tribute from the toiling people. They were the self-evident personification of tyranny. To rise against them, destroy them, escape their vassalage, was to leave an open road along which the products of free men could pass untolled. Organised resentment and bloody victory were the sole essentials for the spontaneous development of industry in its primitive forms.
But the days of primitive industry and primitive Radicalism are passing. Under the freest political institutions exist financial oligarchies more rapacious than the old-time baronies. They bleed, not with sword nor spear, but by subtle processes that leave a people impoverished, they know not how or why. The mechanism of robbery is complex and impersonal. The operators are out of sight. The public only know them as benignant gentry distributing tracts or charity by the wayside.
In theory the Labor Movement is a protest against Capitalism. In practice it is its endorser and subsidiser. Legislation is enacted to make the baronage of Capitalism bearable and acceptable to democracy, but the baronage remains. Its exactions, if less outwardly brutal, are none the less extensive and complete. Not in the least do we touch its sacred edifice, impinge upon its prerogatives, or limit the unseen power which predatory wealth exercises upon the political machinery of the State, the lives of the people, and the economic future of the Nation.
We see States and Nation governed by the machinery of past centuries. We have seen a Labor Government in N.S.W. upholding the absurdity of an Upper Chamber to nullify its own proceedings. We have seen Governments of working men upholding as rigidly as the most rabid Tories all the procedures, formalities, mummeries and ceremonies of obsolete forms of government. In the midst of a flood tide of economic and scientific progression the legislative and administrative methods of Governments stand petrified in the chamber of dead ages.
THE OBJECT OF THIS BOOK is to awaken the public to the truth that the Bank of England, commonly believed to be the most disinterested and patriotic of the nation’s institutions, has been since its foundation during the reign of William of Orange a private and long-sustained effort in lucrative mumbo jumbo, and that it is in these days under! international control, serving foreign nations better on occasion than it serves England.
As a preliminary to the writing of such a book, one generally undertakes a certain amount of research work on well-defined and easily followed lines. If, for example, one wished to find out all there is to be known about Barclays Bank, one would first of all search the records at Somerset House or at the registered offices of the company.
There would be no difficulty in unearthing such important information as the names of the shareholders, the amount each has invested, the real capital of the company subscribed in cash as against the proportion, if any, that has been “watered” by the capitalisation of profits, the total amount of profits earned and the present financial position of the concern.
Resolutions affecting the policy of the bank, its scope and powers and their amendment from time to time, would be set forth in the files as required by the limited companies acts, which also lay down that these shall be open for inspection by the public.
Research affecting the Bank of England is not quite so simple. The investigator is blocked at every turn. There are no files of the Bank of England at Somerset House. Since it is not a limited company, but operates under Parliamentary charters, it has no registered offices and therefore no place where by law its accounts may be scrutinised.
Enquiry at the Bank itself has negative results, unless the enquirer has more than usual persistence. Then he will doubtless have the positive satisfaction of being ejected by minions in uniforms as impressive and official seeming as those garbing the posse from the Brigade of Guards which watches over the sterling virtues of the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street throughout the hours of night.
Here is a reply, dated January 18th, 1933, to a written enquiry:
“In reply to your recent letter I have to inform you as follows:
(1) The list of stockholders published by the Bank is for internal use and is available to Proprietors of Bank Stock only.
(2) The Bank have no statutes or. Articles of Association, their constitution being based upon a Charter of 1694 and various Acts of Parliament, of which the chief is that of 1844.
I may mention that a Statistical Summary, compiled by the Bank of England, has recently been made available at an inclusive charge of 12s. per annum, payable in advance.
RONALD DALE, Secretary.”
And that is as far as the Bank is prepared to assist those who may have the temerity to be interested in its affairs. The Statistical Summary, of course, confines itself mainly to the note issue and the Bank reserves, and this information is in any case published weekly in the London Gazette. The Summary gives away no secrets.
In the forward to Tom’s second book, The American Voters Vs. The Bank Tom says, “I know God called me to get the banking message out to the nation. I do not claim to do this from my power but rather from the authority, power and provision of God’s anointing in my life.” Since March of 1998, I began reading Tom’s books and listening to his audio tapes, and frequently heard Torn on shortwave radio as I tried to get alternative news about what is really going on in this country. After confirming Tom’s information by my own research, and participating in Tom’s weekly conference calls, it became apparent that it was time for me to take an active part in assisting Tom in his calling.
In a recent phone call with Tom, he wondered why he had been missing some important financial exchanges in his most recent venture. He realized that God wanted this Manual completed first! It appears to me that God is ready NOW to begin the fulfillment of the Vision described in Habakkuk 2:
“Then the Lord answered me and said “Record the vision, and inscribe it on tablets, that the one who reads it may run. For it is yet for the appointed time; it hastens toward the goal, and it will not fail. Though it tarries, wait for it: for it will certainly come, it wilt not delay…
THE PATRIOTIC British author Emily Bronte who 100 years ago wrote the masterpiece of literature “Wuthering Heights” she said; “The tyrant grinds down his slaves and they don’t turn against him, they just crush those beneath him.”
Exactly 100 years ago in Emily Bronte’s time the British Empire covered a third of the world, but two ridiculous world wars for reasons historians cannot adequately explain, and waffle about an Archduke in Austria and agreements with Poland, explanations which just don’t stack up, have depleted Britain and other nations’ wealth but made the bankers rich beyond belief, this money stolen from us is actually loaned back to us at high interest by the IMF ( International Monetary fund) which is really Rothschild who stole the money in the first place.