QUESTION: What about Love your enemies, it says this so many times, and you hear it always?
ANSWER: This is just a controversial question actually, because the Sermon on the mount, and the teaching of Christ gave as a social order was given freely unto those who constituted a Christian society. This order that Jesus discussed in his sermon on the mount, as instructions to his disciples are declarations unto the culture he was counselling which was a new order of Christian civilization.
The instructions related to how people conducted themselves inside the kingdom. They had no relationship to the dealing of the Kingdom with those on the outside. There were special instructions concerning this matter.
Jesus tells how he would deal with them himself. So where the scripture says they were to love their enemies or turn their other cheek this was not talking about the enemies of God’s Kingdom. This has not relationship, for instance between the Soviet Union and the United States. But inside the true Church, inside the Kingdom, inside the Adamic race they were to treat one another this way. In other word something to appeal to within this race. There is a sense of responsibility, of shame, or pride based on the ability to define the law.
But there is no spiritual emotion to appeal to when you get outside the household, outside the race when you deal with the enemies of God. YOU cannot appeal to their emotions and ethics and morality of an idol worshiper for instance, or to the hoards of communist who would just as soon liquidate Christian nations as not. Never turn your cheek to them or you will lose your whole head.
QUESTION: When Solomon was dedicating the Temple, he said something about the stranger, who is not of thy people Israel, but cometh out of a far country for thy names sake: (1 Kings 8: 4-10)-“He shall come and pray at this house.” Is this sound doctrine?
ANSWER: This area of Solomon’s petition is OK in that in the instance of the standards of the Temple, and the Israelite culture, there is no culture more completely segregated than this the Israel culture. No one outside of their race could participate in the Priesthood. No one outside of the society of the Levites could ever participate in the areas of education. But there was not any block against any people who approached the God of Israel, nothing to stop him, in petition from approaching HIM. They could never move into the inner court of the Temple, but they could come into the court of the strangers sometimes called the court of the Gentiles.
From this area they could make their petition to the God of Israel. In other words this has never been closed for anyone to approach unto Israel’s God. Basically it is a pattern of Monotheism, and in this Monotheism it recognized only one true Sovereign God of the Universe. And with this concept in background, then the stranger who threw away this concept of idols and pagan gods, and approached unto the God of Israel had the opportunity of making a petition from the court on the outside, which is called the court of the strangers, the court of the nations, or the court of the outside.
QUESTION: Did Moses Marry an Israelite?
ANSWER: Now this answer depends on where you start to qualify people as Israelites. The word “Israel”, Issue ruling with God, thus takes in all Adamites who provide this issue. The fact that Jacobs name was formerly changed to Israel did not start, Israel, as a people. In other words this was a name placed on Jacob’s descendants and was through used constantly and consecutive, but prior to that time both Enoch as well as Seth realized, because God had declared to them, that they were Israel, His issue ruling in earth, that this was their destiny, their commission. So Adam was an Israelite in that he was an issue of God.
The third chapter of the book of Luke establishes this as it traces the genealogy of Jesus back to Seth, the son of Adam who was the son of God. The word, son, is Issue or progeny. Thus when one recognizes this, then the Adamic or White Race is the progeny of God. This is the marked distinction between the white race and other races which existed. There may have been and there is evidence that there were other races besides the Asiatics, and the NEGROES ON THE EARTH, BUT THE Adamic race was strictly the White race.
QUESTION: In the Old Testament in some places it says: strangers should be treated because you were once a stranger in Egypt. Other places wipe them out, are these harmonious?
ANSWER: Yes, most harmonious. Anyone who comes from the outside, travelling Through an Israel nation, other races of other backgrounds are strangers, and they are not to be abused or defrauded. but when it talks about the strangers of the Canaanite houses, the Amalakites, the Amorites, these were enemies of our race.
You are silly if you let them into your land as far as that is concerned but when you entered into old Canaan land you were to destroy everything which was there. If our race had obeyed this fully we wouldn’t have this problem today with those who were allowed to survive, rather their generations. There is one handicap for women usually have an attraction for men, and most of them are attractive to a degree.
So Canaanite women were allowed to survive, just out of the kindness of their hearts, but this was an error. So to understand the laws of survival in the Old Testament, one has to be fully aware of the background behind them. Remember that the Hittites were an old Asiatic line coming out of the Torog’s. Actually they were pre-eminently similatable offspring of Angelic called Nephilim i n the Old Testament. So you had a type of thin faced hawk faced Jew.
QUESTION: Was Nimrod an Israelite?
ANSWER: He was an Adamite, a white man, but his Queen was not of the race, and this was what got Nimrod into trouble. She was a Hindu from India, and this is where the Priesthood out of India set up their Satanic Trinity. They created this image and actually sought to transfer Lucifer and Lilleth and any embodied offspring in symbolism to Nimrod, to capture the Kingdom of Nimrod. Nimrod was a Hamite, but the Seth line through Seth came on down to Terah who was Prime Minister for Nimrod. Terah was the father of Abraham but he got out of the Prime Ministers job under Nimrod before Nimrod fell completely under Paganism.
QUESTION: A lot of those things like trinity were adopted into the early church, were they not?
ANSWER: Only into Rome first. This was done after the Jews joined the church to condemn the doctrines. They put a lot of pagan things into the doctrine of Rome thinking they would eventually take over. But they were never able to take away the testimony of the Deity of Christ through the Virgin Birth. This is where they failed.
QUESTION: Is this where Ash Wednesday and different things come from today, and is Ash Wednesday to be celebrated?
ANSWER: Well, Ash Wednesday is also in the Episcopal church since it was established.
QUESTION: What does it mean when it says some were ‘cut off’ from the congregation?
QUESTION: Would you go into detail about the world projection, about using animals in producing vaccines?
ANSWER: This would not be in our field, this area is one in which you would find much controversy, and my personal opinion might be considered rather antiquated. I am a fair student in the areas of bio‑chemistry and biology, and I don’t believe in putting the crux of any dead animal into the human body especially if in any areas of this animals background he has disease communicable to the human being.
Now: fortunately for us diseases of horses are not communicable unto us except in areas of hoof and mouth disease. There is areas of this which can be communicated to the human being. But horses which have been well tested, and have no trace of this, and no pattern in it have no known diseases communicable to the human body.
Thus it was when they came out years ago with the yellow fever and small pox vaccine and so forth, they found that horses were a relative safe area to go into. Your Salk vaccine as you know today is made from monkeys and from material taken from the kidneys of the monkey, and they cut it up in very fine pieces in finishing this culture.
Now: the monkey is first given a live virus of polio, and then from this kidney area is made the serum used in vaccine, and then this multiplied into a great culture from whence the vaccine is taken.
BEFORE WE TAKE QUESTIONS TONIGHT, there are some rather significant and startling things which transpired, and sometimes information gets out which the enemy thinks it has suppressed nothing which more clearly identifies ‘Mystery Babylon,’ or forces behind it than their actions. And when you identify them with actions and influences in areas of your government have identification.
Here of course in the scriptures you will note that Mystery Babylon is the Mother of Harlots, the abominations of the earth. And therefore in this declaration the Angel cries out against Babylon the Great saying: “She is fallen, is fallen.” This is the beginning of the prophetic chapter on the fall of Babylon. And this “Mystery Babylon” is the habitation of all devils, every foul spirit, and a cage of every hateful and unclean bird. Thus it is that the identification which the Christ gives to John as to the order of Babylon, the symbol of its economic, political, and social administration which is made up of every unclean and hateful spirit is quite clear. It is made up of every foul and evil devil, and every unclean bird symbolized as a bird such as a vulture which hangs around to prey on death.
QUESTION: The Apostles were to go unto only certain homes were they not?
ANSWER: When HE sent out the Apostles, HE sent them only to ‘The Lost Sheep’ of Israel. Thus only to those who had the capacity to receive and to understand. HE spent no time in sending them out to those who lacked spiritual capacity. And if they were not of the seed line He never sent an Apostle to them.
Thus worthiness was built not on what they had accomplished, but on who they were, on the basis of what was invested in them. In other words: ‘Spirit of His Spirit’, ‘Life of His Life’, to those He sent the Apostles and disciples. The word is not merely worthy, for this is just a matter of translation. Is this quote you read from the Amplified version? Well, the fact of the matter is that He sent them out to those who could receive, or understand.
This is the same thing you find in the Book of Matthew: ‘To you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom, to them it is not given.’ Therefore He said: I speak unto you in parables these mysteries lest they hearing might partially understand and join you. The thing HE did not want was for the enemy to join the children of the Kingdom, for this would be a catastrophe. They would only use their wisdom to destroy from within the centre. Therefore He said: I speak to you of mysteries which they lacking spiritual perception cannot receive.
QUESTION: Do you believe in, or did you ever see Washington’s Vision?
ANSWER: Oh yes, we have published Washington’s Vision. I have seen the original in the Library of Congress.
QUESTION: What do you think about the last of the vision? Remember the people knelt down and prayed, and then looked up and saw heavenly beings in the sky?
ANSWER: Reinforcements coming in.
QUESTION: Well, that encouraged the American people and they fought harder than ever. Now those heavenly beings, were they in flying saucers?
ANSWER: Well, all of this is coordinated, but what happens when a person tries to write it up and tell it, details sometimes aren’t quite as accurate, and McClellen wrote the details as Washington told it. Washington had written it in two communications as he remembered it. Now; this is why there are two versions of the letters, the original and MeClellen’s copy, and why they are slightly different, because McClellen copied the original. In this again, the Invasion is a struggle against the Asiatic and the Blacks, carrying communism and the flag, and the hoards symbolize, red, for of course communism is red.
QUESTION: Do you believe in, or did you ever see Washington’s Vision?
ANSWER: Oh yes, we have published Washington’s Vision. I have seen the original in the Library of Congress.
QUESTION: What do you think about the last of the vision? Remember the people knelt down and prayed, and then looked up and saw heavenly beings in the sky?
ANSWER: Reinforcements coming in.
QUESTION: Well, that encouraged the American people and they fought harder than ever. Now, those heavenly beings were they in flying saucers?
ANSWER: Well, all of this is coordinated, but what happens when a person tries to write it up and tell it, details sometimes aren’t quite as accurate, and McClellen wrote the details as Washington told it. Washington had written it in two communications as he remembered it. Now; this is why there are two versions of the letters, the original and MeClellen’s copy, and why they are slightly different, because McClellen copied the original. In this again, the Invasion is a struggle against the Asiatic and the Blacks, carrying communism and the flag, and the hoards symbolize, red, for of course communism is red.
QUESTION: I was listening to a tape of about two weeks ago where you were discussing the spiritual forces, other than Christianity. I would like a little of an understanding on this, on an over all view.
ANSWER: Negative forces?
QUESTION: Well, both negative and positive and their relationship?
ANSWER: Well, the word spiritual of course is sometimes ambiguous. We use the word spiritual to allot anything which is not a physical or temporal domain. Other words: remember that a fallen Angel like Lucifer was a spiritual being. He can be embodied, but also he can move in Celestial planes. Although at the present time he is earth bound, and cannot ascend into the higher heavens, still there was a time when he could do that.
The Book of Job tells us that when various Angles came to report unto God then Satan came among them. God has a vast number of reporting Angels coming from all over the Universe to report, and there was Lucifer standing among them. This was after the time of his rebellion, and thus this particular council may have been held within the Solar system and not in the Pleaides. But wherever this was located, still from all over the Universe had come visiting Angelic and spiritual beings, and Lucifer was among them. And YAHWEH looked over there and decided he would taunt the devil at bit and HE said: ‘Hast thou considered my servant Job?’
QUESTION: Spiritual power and blessing. why prayer isn’t answered, The Mantle of Elijah, how can this power be obtained?
ANSWER: Lets take another question first, if we get into this first we will be here all night.
QUESTION: How can we determine God’s Word in the Bible and someone else word? You get into a discussion with someone and they say, but you only pick out of the Bible what you want to believe, how do you face that?
ANSWER: Well, the way you face this situation is to remember that most of these people are talking from a lack of knowledge, where as the thing you are discussing with them is from an area of knowledge. Now, the bible contains the Word of God, and most of it is inspired. However, there are books that are not inspired included therein.
The book of Esther is a fraudulent book, it has a fictitious background in much of its material. It was written by Jewry, it excuses and creates a foundation for liquidation and persecution of their enemies. Esther seduced a King, and in the background of this was strictly Jewish story concocted log after the events, and should not have been considered inspired. Then the Song of Solomon is another phoney book. It does not have the name of God in it even once, and deals with the love affairs supposedly of Solomon, and three or four others of different races, Negroes and everything else and is actually a phoney book.
QUESTION: I want to know something about this tower of Babel. I have a friend who is a Catholic and he went to his Priest, and he said that the races began at the tower of Babel.
ANSWER: Of course, he is quite wrong. Because there were people before the tower, because they built the tower. This would be like the egg coming before the chicken or did it?
QUESTIONER: What I would like to know is, were these people trying to reach the heavens? Would God need to confuse their tongue to show them how foolish they were?
ANSWER: God has never really worried about anything. We have a lot of traditions and history connected with the Tower of Babel. And of course the city of Babel was one of the places conquered by Nimrod, and thus was under the rule of Nimrod. His capital city later was UR of the Chaldeans. But when Nimrod first conquered, what was known as Erech and Babel, when he first marched down into the plain of Shinar, his idea was the avenging what had been wars and massacres against the white race carried out by these pagans of all kinds. At that time Nimrod was a monotheists of course worshiping One God, and the basic thing about Nimrod was that he was from the house of Noah, from Ham, and the catastrophe which had enveloped the upper Tarim basin before the flood of Noah’s time ,had been induced by some of these Satanic and pagan forces.
QUESTION: The Urim and Thummim are they for the church? Could you use them?
ANSWER: No, No, they were for the High Priests only, and operated with immediate spiritual reaction. A King could only apply for an answer, and ask the High Priest to ask the question and use the Urim and Thummim, but Saul was not using it properly at that time and that was why it would not work. I don’t want to get into the areas of occultism.
However as far as spiritual forces are concerned this was a Divine operation. But Lucifer duplicates this kind of thing, and a Weegie Board that she mentioned is a Satanic operation, and it operates on a trilogy of function. It takes two people as a rule who catalyse their energies which are opposite and polarized, and then a familiar spirit moves the operation entirely. A Weegie Board should not be allowed in the home of Christians for it is a part of the function of Witchcraft. But as far as Saul was concerned, Saul just wasn’t getting any answers. He was being liquidated as King and all these things were a part of the pattern of destiny, but this does not have anything to do with Eternal Life. Hasn’t had anything to do with his destiny, he had accomplished his purpose.
QUESTION: I have a friend back in West Virginia who listens to your tapes all the time and I promised him I would ask any question for him that he would want asked, and he said: What position does Dr. Swift hold on the people of the Adamic race who do not receive Jesus Christ as their Saviour? What about murderers, adulterers, liars, drunkards who apparently do not give any thought to Jesus Christ? Does Dr. Swift believe that all the White Adamic Race will share the same position throughout eternity?
ANSWER: This question is as long as it is involved. I will say this to get into your question, the Adamic race, or the white race, is the offspring of THE MOST HIGH, they were spiritually begotten in the heavens before they were ever begotten in the earth. They brought nothing into the world but their beings. They possess a Celestial being as well as a physical one. The soul consciousness is resident in a physical body and is activated by the patterns of the senses.
The Activation of the consciousness which is the Celestial mind impacts upon the areas of the soul’s reasoning, and does to a certain degree restrain and effect or make the consciousness of an individual uncomfortable when his selections are not correct in relationship to Divine protection on the sense pattern. In other words, the only areas of temptation to a race such as yours is in the physical area because the only areas of transgression is physical. The soul consciousness draws all of its evaluations out of either the natural perceptions of the five senses or out of the areas of Celestial consciousness.
QUESTION: One lady said the Christian Defence League was backing Goldwater in this election. Is that true?
ANSWER: I don’t know of anyone of the CDL who is doing this. You wouldn’t back a half Jew who has let you down all the way. If you think that Goldwater is a Christian because he goes to a Christian Church, remember that he said the reason he did this was because there was no synagogue in his town where he was raised. He was telling other Jews this story and they all laughed about it.
There are strategies to use sometimes in elections where you vote for the lesser evil, but I don’t want to get into this. I have not discussed with the CDL who to vote for except in the matter of Co. Gale in that district. Now; Alan Cranston is running for a senate seat, and also Pierre Salanger which leaves the Democrats with no choice.
This Alan Cranston is a One-World Federalist, and in Italy today he is under suspicion of murder of anti-communist officials who would have been in power in the post war government. This has been buried until the statute of limitations has run out, and our government would not let Italy bring these charges against this man in the proper channels, for they would have charged him with murder. A Colonel in charge of Security briefed Colonel Greer and myself about how the two top anti-communist leaders in Rome were liquidated by high officials connected with our military, and told us who they were , and Alan Cranston was one of them.
QUESTION: I would like for you to explain to me about the Old Testament and the New Testament, what changes were made. Because when you tangle with the Jehovah Witnesses they are always telling you that as the New Testament was made different facets were applied to it until it is not the same as the Old Testament.
ANSWER: Don’t ever try to compare anything on the basis of what the Jehovah Witnesses have to say. When you finally find out where they stand you have something to work with, but basically the general run of them is Biblically illiterate. They are quite well informed on the books written by Judge Rutherford who is now dead, and since that time the International Bible house has come out with a tremendous amount of paper turned into propaganda, and these people know this forward and backward, but you can lose them in a hurry in the Bible.
Then they only have a few verses they know very well, such as the 144,000, and they think that these are Jehovah Witnesses, and they are the only ones going into the gates of the New Jerusalem, the heavens and yet there are some 3 million of them in the organization. One came to my door once and I said: if I became a convert then what could you offer me? He said: well you could become one of the 144,000. I said: are you one of that 144,000? And he said: Of course.
QUESTION: Is there a time limit on Jacobs Trouble?
ANSWER: Well, there is of course in the measure of heaven, without a doubt, because they know the end from the beginning, and they know the hour when it will be all over, when we will have won a total and complete victory. But to give you a time limit at this moment will be a hard thing to do. I think the intensity of this situation is going to step up with great speed. I don’t think the temple will permit it. I think that you might figure that if things get under way with the speed of the proper intensity of the measure, as it looks here in 1964., then you would be coming out of it in say 1967‑68, but this would be in line with proper measure. But that is a long time, 3½ years for some situations, it depends on where you are, and if you are standing somewhere and they are shooting at you, then that would be a long time. There are lots of things which are yet to happen, that are in the measure.
QUESTION: Where in the Scripture does it talk about a daughter of Jerusalem being on the throne, a daughter of David in these latter days?
ANSWER: There are several references to a daughter of Israel‑David, but here is one I will show you. Micah 4; ‘In the last days it shall come to pass that the Kingdom of YAHWEH shall be established in the top of the nations, and it shall be exalted above smaller nations; and people shall flow to it. And many nations shall come and go into the Kingdom of YAHWEH‑ YAHSHUA, to the house of the God of Jacob.’
QUESTION: Can you tell us anything about the operation down in Mississippi, 3 people missing?
ANSWER: We don’t have any report on it, but this disappearing act is caused by the enemy, and it started some time before this. There is no question in my mind that the disappearance of Pastor Herroll out of the Christian Conservative Church was by the left wing, elimination of the man, his wife and five of his children. That was six months ago, and this just goes to show you how far the strategy of the enemy can go in eliminating a man.
This man was actually Chaplain of several patriotic organizations and he was worth about $600,000.00 in liquid assets, as far as property is concerned which he had given to the church. And when he disappeared it was when he was to go to an interrogation, and then on to a patriotic meeting in New Mexico. They found the car and some blood stains and this is all they ever found. Then the F.B.I., said that since he was coming to be interrogated that they thought he just skipped out, and after 3 months they put out a wanted poster, and I have a copy of that, but they never found the man, his wife or his children.
QUESTION: In Revelation, why is the tribe of Dan left out?
ANSWER: Actually, Dan prepared the way in migrations across Europe. The trail of Dan is to be found everywhere. Denmark marks the tribe of Dan. And he is not left out of the Assembly of Marching Israel. Dan was infiltrated, absorbed into lots of the tribes as they came westward. He was over in Anglo-Saxon land as well as in Denmark. But in Revelation both houses of Joseph are named. So if you have two houses of Joseph, then Dan would have made 13.
So they want the number at twelve. So I think it is just a matter of translation. (Levi was to be absorbed into all tribes) Dan is not left out. And anytime anyone tries to cite that Dan was rejected or ejected from the numbering of the tribes of Israel, it is very foolish because no part of the white race has been ejected. None removed. Probably no tribe has more marking of their migrations that Dan does. Of course the marching positions of the great nations which are a part of the descendants of the House of Jacob are still to be found positioned almost exactly as they were found in their encampments and eventually in their provinces set up around Jerusalem. To the East, to the West, North and South, they are almost in the same groupings today as nations.
QUESTION: When will you discuss the displacement factor in the Pyramid?
ANSWER: Not tonight, we will, but we should use charts. There might be some factor, or area of it which we might hit upon such as the number 153 fish in the net however.
QUESTION: The Tower of Babel. There are many things said about this?
QUESTION: How could Eve being perfect still fall, She had a perfect body?
ANSWER: Well: you could have a perfect body and still be seduced.
QUESTION: Well we keep talking about this perfect body, but they fell in the flesh didn’t they?
ANSWER: That’s right, there wasn’t anything wrong with their bodies, they were enveloped in Light, and there was a foul consciousness resident in those bodies just like you. But they had been instructed not to intermingle with any of these other races. This was the basic instruction they were given, this other tree they were not to mingle with was, ‘The Tree of Good and Evil’ and was a racial tree. Of all the trees which had fruit for food they could partake of, but there was no race with whom they were permitted to intermingle with. There was no race existent in the earth that hadn’t had knowledge of Good and of Evil through the Luciferian influence, for Lucifer was now king over this earth, and Prince of the powers of the air.
Lucifer knew that this was going to be a new Household, and he wanted to contaminate and destroy it before it got started. So Lucifer or Azazel seduced Eve, he talks her into this. Adam and Eve had already beheld races and people and some were like almost Nomads while others were moving with all kinds of wealth and majesty and Glory, and Lucifer’s household was all decked with Jewels, for he went overboard for Jewels and Jewelry and magnificent clothes. We are told in the earliest writings of Enoch and Job and also in the early Zohar as to what a tremendous impression Lucifer made. So he just talked Eve into an attitude of mind in which he said: if YAHWEH said this, it is because He doesn’t want you to be radiant like we are, and to possess all these things.
QUESTION: How do people react to God?
ANSWER: Well, they react to Light. Essentially everything reacts to Light. Everything in the creation has to react to the creation. But the Creator is not a reaction. He is a causation. Even for HIM to think or to design, or to process, is to put it into operation. No, God does not react to people. He is the Causation. However, God directs responses which you might call reaction. But it is only the cycle of human perception and request. After a man finds a need in which he reaches out to God, the discovery of such a need originates with God who stimulated the consciousness of the individual.
Therefore, prayer doesn’t start with man. It comes forth as an impulse from God. Comes to an area of cognition of need within an individual. And returns as a cycle of completed awareness, and God answers this. Where as an individual who just on his own, asks as he wants something he decided, without a particular purpose or impulse starting it out, then this is what we call ‘cycling prayer’, this is a Gimmi (give me)prayer. There are lots of these prayers. They didn’t ask because it was constructively necessary but just because they wanted it. So some of these things just depend upon the initiative of energy other than a whole long focal chain of events. But remember is directly Causation not Reaction.
QUESTION: What is the Biblical position on divorce. And how did it effect this putting away of these outsiders that Israel married and brought in?
ANSWER: We answered, or discussed Divorce about a week or two ago. And it is on tape.
QUESTION: I don’t understand about this in Genesis, in the time of Joseph, when he had this dream about the 7 fat years and the 7 lean years, and then he took all the peoples cattle, and bought all their land for Pharaoh, then after that he gave them seed to plant and said that they were to give one‑fifth to Pharaoh, but he had taken their land?
ANSWER: You have a different type of operation at that time. You will discover that Pharaoh is the Sovereign over all Egypt. And if you go into this type of government you find not only was it maintained as a sovereignty with nobody but Pharaoh or the Royal household owning the property, but all Egyptians were considered their family. This was the kind of Aristocracy that they had, and Pharaoh alone could grant a piece of territory to anyone else, thus he granted the land of Goshen unto the brethren of Joseph when they came in. So the entire aristocracy was controlled by Pharaoh and his family, and he had around him a bunch of Priests, and soothsayers who helped shape his decisions, but Joseph had no control over the existing structure of this government, he only worked under it.
I have Dr. Petries copy of the “Book of the Dead”, and I can show you the entire structure of control of Egypt at that time, and the Pharaoh so to speak had “the last word”. Pharaoh set up everything, Pharaoh was the owner of all Egypt. Pharaoh was our gracious master, he gives us our homes, Pharaoh gives us everything, see.
Dr. Swift talking as tape commences, a question about the Books of Enoch I think (Ella). In the Book of Enoch it says that Enoch was shown the Valley of Fire and beings in it in torment, and when asked as to what it was, was told these are they who have committed sin. This is strictly a Roman concoction. The Book which you can get a copy of today is the one which Oxford re-did. It is a copy of the same kind of manuscripts they used when they did the King James Version, from the Roman Editions. All these hells and purgatories in the Book of Enoch as well as in the Apocrypha was Roman inserted, and didn’t exist before this.
There were a great number of Roman Theologians some of whom I know who will admit this. But there has never been a manuscript which goes back to the time of the Disciples which had any hell fire sown in it, not one single one of them. Not one single one of them ever suggested that a man was punished with fire after he died, or that he went into any situation such as this.
It was the Apocalypse of the Apostle Paul that they tried so hard to change. I have the version now of the one after they tampered with it. I had one of the original ‘Apocalypse of Paul’ but it was taken at the auditorium in down town Los Angeles. We have another one but this one was changed from the original. So when ever you get anything which talks about fire and brimstone and torment, for a person after he dies, then you have a Babylonianized document that had this added after the Second Century, in Rome.
QUESTION: Did God predestine that Abel was to be killed?
ANSWER: It was foreknown.
QUESTION: Well then, what about thou shalt not kill?
ANSWER: Whoa there! Now you are talking about a standard of conduct which has nothing to do with foreknowledge. This is an area of conduct and instruction. The words: “Thou shalt not kill”, are not correct. It should be “Thou shalt do no murder.” There is a difference in killing in defence and all those patterns and in planned murder when some individual does this. What you are talking about is a pattern of direction and the law. And the statement of the law is not the fulfilment of the law.
There is a depth to this discussion if you go into that. But Predestination is unbreakable, absolute sovereign, immutable, unchangeable. It is what the MOST HIGH knows about His sons and His daughters. And what He has purposed to accomplish and that He will bring to pass. He has areas where He gives them a permissive leash. In other words, they have areas where they can be in a perfect centre of WILL according to fulfilment, or given a limited way or area of fluctuation. But not beyond the given point as to Destiny. Because the destiny isn’t something in their hands to decide. When you recognize this, then “Children not yet born, doing neither good or evil” in the purpose of God according to His election. His purposes, then these things are final patterns.
QUESTION: The Books of the Bible.
ANSWER: There were 163 books which should be classified as inspired books. Some of them were scrolls and might not be but two or three chapters as we would term them today. But remember that none of these scrolls that make up the books of the Bible were originally divided in chapters and verses. This was done back in the early period of printing. Many books and many volumes and anything pertaining to religion or theology were done in chapters and verses, so as to locate it again, it brings out any point they wished to discuss.
So it became sort of a religious legal form, as they started putting everything in chapters and verses. We do have the book of Jude, a short book which is just one chapter. But there were 163 books or volumes and scrolls which could have made many chapters and books. All were inspired and all of them could have been used, by the early Patriarchs down to the writing of the New Testament. The sum total were more than that but 163 were known to be inspired. The council of Nicaea sometimes called Nicolea today by the contemporary commentators talking about the crisis in Cyprus, and so forth, but they were not Nicolaitanes, and they are not pronouncing this according to the old associations.
But they had well over 300 volumes to choose from and they whittled them down to only 66 books and only 64 of them belonged in the original of 163. Out of that 300 or more volumes of scrolls there were actually 163 good ones, and you will ask how do I find them? This is a little hard to do but you can find them.
QUESTION: Please explain, ‘Try the spirits’. (I John 4:1‑3)
ANSWER: “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits for many false prophets have gone out into the world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God; every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God. Every spirit that confesseth NOT that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God, but is of Anti‑Christ that was to come.” This is in itself explanatory, the only thing to remember here is that it has some holes in it. As to Identity it is quite clear. This is more than that He came in the flesh, but that He was the embodiment of YAHWEH, Himself.
The fact is that this was YAHWEH who said through the prophet Isaiah: “I am YAHWEH THY YAHSHUA” or “I am YAHWEH THY SAVIOR”, beside me there is none else.’ (Isaiah 43) I alone am God, and then when the Angel spoke to Mary he said: “Ye shall call his name YAHSHUA, for HE shall save His people”, thus identifying HIM AS YAHWEH. “Blessed is He who comes in the name of YAHWEH’, this is the identification, this is the embodiment of YAHWEH‑YAHSHUA or the LORD JESUS as we say today. Jesus is the derivation from the Greek word, and when the Angel spoke in Hebrew to Mary he said: “Thou shalt call his name YAHSHUA”.
QUESTION: Could you please explain what would be the best way to go about reading and understanding the Parables?
ANSWER: Well, the Parables are mostly about the Kingdom. In this instance most of the Parables relate to the structure of the Kingdom itself. And many of the Parables are not relative to the outside powers except when it talks about the sower of the seed. The good seed being the children of the Kingdom, and the bad seed being the children of the evil one.
The word here used is for progeny, and is definitely talking about offspring. Now; the Parables are almost all in this light, ‘Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven, unto them it is not given.’ Christ not only spake in Parables so that the enemy would not understand but then gave a private interpretation to the keys of some of the most secret of the Parables to His disciples when He drew them aside. This is why today so many of these Parables have only been superficially approached. And in this instance made to be applicable sometimes to conditions unrelated.
QUESTION: Something about Byrd’s exploration and the Inner earth?
ANSWER: Well, Admiral Byrd was looking for an entrance into the INNER EARTH at the South Pole. He was very curious as to this, and in one of the trips he made to the South Pole he could see under clear ice, buildings frozen over with ice, clearly frozen in the ice. They had come on this spot twice in their transversing of Antarctica. What would happen to them is that they would get caught in a huge snow storm and they couldn’t find the spot again unless the snow would melt or blow away in drifts. But they knew that there was at one time a civilization at the South Pole which is now covered with ice.
This is one of the things our expedition was involved with, and Byrd himself had written a tremendous notebook, which is about to be published, and we know some of his material because he discussed it at the Explorers Club about seeing these stone buildings under the ice. And about how they intended to go back to this spot, and try to find this place where the shifting storms had covered them, but they thought they knew within a few miles of where it was, but there was no vegetation or anything to mark the spot. It was not close enough to any high mountains to use the peaks for markers to pin point the place. Of course he was looking for the entrance in the south polar region, to the Inner earth.
Now; there was main areas down there covered with perpetual vapour and mist, and vapours arise all the time. This means that there is warm air coming out of the earth at all times. Birds fly out of openings down there, and fresh twigs and some leaves of plants are scattered around on the ice. Byrd knew more about this than that but this even has its value because in the book of Job there is reference to the entrance to inner‑earth, and how God closed over the entrances in the north, and about the frozen gates with their covering of ice, which was supposed to be a bottling in. (Job 38)
THE ELECTION, WAS CUT AND DRIED AND THE PRESS WAS DOING THE CONVINCING OF THE PEOPLE. Before 1960, 2 states Illinois and Texas were the 2 states rigged to save the election for the Democrats. This was considered to dangerous, to close. This started the method of declaring by T.V. of estimates of electoral votes on a small percentage of votes. But the attack came in Viet Nam showing the close work with the Reds, Communists just before the election, and if they hadn’t had this all planned out they wouldn’t have let you have an election.
You are in a period when there is a certain amount of apathy by the people. They want security, no worries, no wars, although they are in a deadly one, but they are turning away from that to total amusement, and not thinking, depending on TV. for mass information and miss‑information, and the idea that the government owes them total medical care, security, with nothing built around thrift or on the Bible or Constitution. The greatest mistake we ever made in this country is when we started abandoning the constitutional foundations of our forefathers, back in the days of Madison and others, of the right to vote, which should have remained at all times in the hands of those who had an equity in the country, property owners, because they pay the bills. This is the way the elections were conducted in the first 3 administrations. Then you don’t have this pressure from groups who want supplied with something for nothing.
QUESTION: John 1:12; “To those who receive Him, to them he gave the power to become sons of God, even to those that believe on His name.”
ANSWER: Yes, we hear many of all races received HIM. To begin with this is a fictitious translation and error at the time of the translation. Secondly it is a thoroughly impossible situation, and thirdly all races did not receive Him so what is being said here in this first chapter of John? The opening of the Book of John talks about Him being the Light which came into the world. Then “He came unto his own and his own received him not. Then as many as received Him He gave the power to become sons of God.” This is what the Episcopalians translated this to be, and what the King James and Douay versions had established under phoney church theology because they were trying to twist church theology to suit themselves, and the Jewish Priests at Rome had tried to make it a doctrine to embrace all people, all races, and everybody else in the structure of Christianity.
Let’s then go back to St. John 1:12 and take this passage found here: “Therefore (talking about Christ) this was the light that lighted every man (Adamite).” Now; this world was made by Him, but it knew Him not, thus; “He came into the world and the world (order) knew Him not.” The world was made by Him but the world (order) knew Him not. Thus He came unto His own and His own received Him not. The translation should have been: “He came to the land of His inheritance and the rulers (or occupiers) received Him not.”
QUESTION: An explanation of John 8:37?
ANSWER: This is of course a sad translation in the King James Version. This just said: “Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” I was at this time when the Jews stood up and said: ‘How saith thee that the truth shall make us free; we have never been in bondage at anytime?’ This of course proved that they were not Israelites. Because if they had been Israelites, they would have been in bondage as the ten tribes were to Sannacherib or to Nebuchadnezzar. If they were those last in the Judah Kingdom, they would of course, have been in bondage earlier in Egypt.
But in getting around to this 37th verse, they were saying: ‘How can you make us free for we have not been in bondage at any time, but we are Abraham’s seed?’ Now, in the King James Version, it has Jesus saying: ‘I know that ye are Abraham’s seed. But ye seek to kill me.’ This is not the proper translation. It should be: ‘I know ye claim to be Abraham’s seed.’ And then Jesus went on to prove this: ‘If ye were Abraham’s seed, you would do the work of Abraham. Yet I speak the truth which is of God (Spirit) and ye seek to kill me.
This Abraham would not do. Instead ye do the work of your father.’ And they cried out to HIM: ‘We be not born of fornication. We have one father even God.’ But Jesus said: ‘If God were your father, ye would love me. For I proceed forth and came out of God (Spirit). Neither came I of the flesh alone, but of the Spirit.’
QUESTION: There is an anti-Christ in the last days, Daniel 8-3:25. Who will take over and rule with evil powers? Will you explain this?
ANSWER: Well, there is one thing about the book of Daniel, and the multiple and overlapping of the seventh and eighth chapters. It is talking about the Little Horn of Daniel. Significantly for symbolic symbols, this is of Asiatic Kings and powers. One of the old emblems for Asiatic Steppe conquerors like Genghis Khan and others was that their emblem on their head dress had a horn. And this horn would come right out of this forehead.
This headdress was used way back 2000 years ago and even earlier. And of course Daniel always refers to the symbol of these horns. Sometimes they are rams horns. Sometimes they are twisted horns of other animals which gave rise to the Unicorn and so forth. So these are given for symbols of leadership; military powers out of the Asiatic hoards who wage war against your race and against the kingdom. So some of these are dealing with prophecies of Anti-Christ, and others already fulfilled by Empires which arose under the symbols of Greece and Medo-Persia. But under this instance this particular passage refers to the situation in the latter part of their kingdoms when the transgressor comes to its full.
QUESTION: What happened to the Ham and Japhet descendants, and what colour were they?
ANSWER: This is sort of a normal question if people are thinking of all the people on the earth as descending from the Adamic Race, or then out of the House of Noah. Generally speaking one of the great errors of Orthodoxy is to teach that all the people on the face of the earth came from Adam, then every one drowned in the flood but Noah and his sons and their wives. They teach this because they do not realize that the Bible never said that all people drowned in the flood. The word in Hebrew is, eret, so all the people in that place except Noah and his Household in the Ark were drowned.
The flood never effected Egypt or over in Central America it never effected even parts of the Steppe’s of Asia. It never effected Japan or the Islands of the sea because the flood was only in the upper Tarim Plateau, which was high, but which also was rimmed with high mountain ranges of the Tien Shan mountains. It had an inland sea under the floor of this great valley, and this valley was some hundreds of miles long and wide. It was one of those spots called ‘the seat of civilization’. The Adamic race of course started in these Steppes of Asia and came into this particularly large basin as they expanded. From the time of Seth to Noah this Adamic race had been coming out of that area, and they migrated on down to the Persian Gulf area, and some went on down to North Africa, and some branches of the race went Eastward into India as well.
QUESTION: The good and evil figs of Jeremiah, would you please explain?
ANSWER: This is a long and involved question, but the fig leaf and the fig tree representation of Scripture has really nothing to do with Israel except when they are thrust into contact with her. In the Book of Micah you will note that God talks about the end of the age, when the Kingdom comes in, and He said: ‘every man will sit under his own vine and under his own fig tree.’ Thus God more or less divides up the world as under the vine or under the fig tree. If you go back into the oldest symbols you will note that all the pagan symbols in the world seem to have the fig tree and fig leaf woven into their backgrounds. You will see the Fig leaves on all Hindu Temples, and woven into symbols and emblems and spread out in hoods and so forth.
In the very beginning with the seduction of Eve and the fall of the race then Adam was covered then Adam was covered with fig leaves, he had a coat of fig leaves to cover his nakedness, but this was again the symbol of the fig tree, fig leaf connection with Lucifer. So all of Lucifer’s Household has used the symbol of the fig leaf for a long time. The fig leaves represents Jewry, so in this instance sometimes the political machines in control are now always made up of Jews, but are those blinded doing their work. Thus when Jesus was walking with His disciples they came to this fig tree. Now; there is nothing wrong with figs as far as food is concerned, but the fig tree represented the power at the Jerusalem Temple in the time of The Christ.