Media & Culture

“You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel…” Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache

Facts of Jewish Media Control

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney Empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a “control freak”, includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies. As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers. When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic sex and violence. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies. ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, a Jew.

A Cornerstone in Terrorism

MOST FAVOURED NATION TO BECOME CUSTODIAN OF THE HYDROGEN BOMB, Condensed from a report by our Correspondent—Hilary Cotter.

U.N.O. is to have a new home. The world stock of A and H bombs is to be placed in its safekeeping. To “satisfy Russian demands” a neutral location has been chosen for the United Nations permanent headquarters.

This is the big surprise the world’s statesmen are now preparing. But it will not be announced until international tension and the hydrogen bomb terror have reduced the nations (through propaganda) to a state of mind in which they will clutch at any straw.

Why the hesitancy? Because our leaders and those of America and Russia are shy of men­tioning the name of the neutral country which will become possessed of all the terror weapons of the atomic age, and which will become at the same time the seat of the future World Government.

Only when we are brought to the brink of a Third World War, will it be timorously made known that the great powers are “thinking that perhaps” the most suitable location for U.N.O. as the custodian of the hydrogen bomb, would be the neutral state of Israeli.

Such a staple and ingenious way of ending the universal terror is expected to bring tears of relief all around— “Why didn’t someone think of it before?”

Below are the names of those who DID THINK OF IT BEFORE—before the atom bomb was thought of, before the Jews (Zionists) obtained Palestine—even before the U.N.O.

GEORGE FREDERICK HANDEL

The street lamps’ warm and mellow glow,
Flash in water down below.
Lights grow dim in veils of mist;
Wet streets gleam … But wait! What’s this?

A wretched figure, dimly seen,
Limping with ungainly stride,
Wends its way, its toilsome way,
Through streets of London’s riverside.

The complex rigging of the ships
Grows indistinct in skirts of rain;
A feeble glow, a dockside inn,
Invites relief from cold and pain.

But he stumbles on his tear‑streaked way,
Shunning the hostile streets of day.

BRUCE RILEY

THE YEAR OF OUR ALMIGHTY ONE WAS 1741. Although the elderly gentleman’s body was bent with unjust burdens, his soul soared on the wings of stately music, which, because of his palsied hand, seemed destined to remain imprisoned within the confines of his mind. Buoyed by melodies only he could hear, he continued on his night time wanderings.

His name was George Fredrick Handel, an English subject, who spoke with a German accent. He had descended from the pinnacle of glory and acclaim to this valley of night shadows haunted by malevolent spirits. He, whose music would transport his audiences to realms of angelic glory, could only glimpse his Saviour through the bars of an earthly hell.

Christian Youth and Parents, Have You Been “Sucked in” by this Satanic Delusion?

“This know, that in the last days (of this age) perilous (dangerous) times shall Come. For men (and women) will be lovers of their own selves – . Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away”. – 2 Timothy 3:1-5 – Jesus Loves to Rock and Roll Or Does He?

For many years, knowledgeable men and women have known of plans to Capture the minds of our people through “Cultural subversion” – Although we have been told that anti-Christ Communism is dead, the same anti-Christ crowd, headed by Talmudic Zionism, is pursuing the same objective today. During the Korean War (1950-53) this was popularly known as “brain washing”. The Chinese Reds had a more descriptive term, they called it “Thought Control” or “Mind Control”.

Christian Youth and Parents, Have You Been “Sucked in” by this Satanic Delusion?

“This know, that in the last days (of this age) perilous (dangerous) times shall Come. For men (and women) will be lovers of their own selves – . Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away”. – 2 Timothy 3:1-5 – Jesus Loves to Rock and Roll Or Does He?

For many years, knowledgeable men and women have known of plans to Capture the minds of our people through “Cultural subversion” – Although we have been told that anti-Christ Communism is dead, the same anti-Christ crowd, headed by Talmudic Zionism, is pursuing the same objective today. During the Korean War (1950-53) this was popularly known as “brain washing”. The Chinese Reds had a more descriptive term, they called it “Thought Control” or “Mind Control”.

“Every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit… Therefore by their fruits shall ye know them”. – Matt. 7:18, 20

In the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, written near the beginning of the Twentieth Century and proclaimed by the Jewish world, and their Christian stooges as being “counterfeit”, (note that in order to have a counterfeit, you must first have an original, and the counterfeit is made as close to the original as possible in order to fool people. If these “Protocols” are counterfeit, the Zionist Movement has been following them like a “blueprint” for over eighty years), in Protocol XIII, we read: “In order to distant people who may be troublesome from discussion of the political… in order that the masses may not guess what we are about. We will further distant them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, people’s palaces (whorehouses) . . . so we will begin through the press to propose competition In all arts, in sports of all kinds . . . these Interests will distant their minds from questions in which we would find ourselves compelled to oppose them”.

My advice to all of you who use God’s “love and mercy” to put our church people to sleep is “Repent, or ye shall all likewise perish!”

God’s Spirit is calling us to end the stage shows and dramas in His house of worship. His sword has been drawn, and soon it will be wet with the blood of the unrighteous hypocrites who have made a mockery of Him in the name of Christianity.

How can we reach men and women for Christ, when instead of “evangelization”, we see “evangossip”. They sing lies such as: THIS WORLD IS NOT MY HOME, I’M JUST APASSIN’ THROUGH, as they get men and women, boys and girls to compromise with evil. They seem to completely forget Christ said we were to pray: “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, IN EARTH as it is in heaven”. No wonder we aren’t doing much to hold back evil!

PART OF A REPLY TO A COMPLAINT IN A JEWISH NEWSPAPER IN THE UNITED STATES about “anti-Semitism” in the media of Sweden and Lithuania:–

Dear Sir,

First of all I would like to laud you for an exhaustive and well-prepared site. You have certainly gone through the Jewish question thoroughly before compiling your observations and analysis. Reading your This week’s Jewish News as usual today there was one piece of news that made my face wreathed in smiles.

The piece of news concerned how the Jewish community of Lithuania accused LNK television for anti-Semitism.

Well, the far too familiar irony is that the LNK, as stated in the article is owned by the Bonnier family, based in my country of origin, Sweden. Worth mentioning then is that the Bonniers are Jewish themselves. Bonnier is a taken name; originally the family was named Hirschel. Not only is the Bonnier family Jewish and not only do they own LNK, but they are the far most influential media group in Sweden and in Finland.

Of the seven largest daily newspapers in Sweden, the seven with a daily circulation of over 100,000, the Bonnier family owns four, Dagens Nyheter (the Daily News), Expressen (the Express), Sydsvenska Dagbladet (the Southern Swedish Daily News) and Dagens Industri (the Industry of Today).

THERE ARE AT LEAST FOUR KINDS OF DOUBLESPEAK. The first kind is the euphemism, a word or phrase that is designed to avoid a harsh or distasteful reality. When a euphemism is used out of sensitivity for the feelings of someone or out of concern for a social or cultural taboo, it is not doublespeak. For example, we express grief that someone has passed away because we do not want to say to a grieving person, “I’m sorry your father is dead.” The euphemism passed away functions here not just to protect the feelings of another person but also to communicate our concern over that person’s feelings during a period of mourning .

However, when a euphemism is used to mislead or deceive, it becomes doublespeak. For example, the US .State Department decided in 1984 that in its annual reports on the status of human rights in countries around the world it would no longer use the word killing. Instead, it uses the phrase unlawful or arbitrary deprivation of life.

Thus the State Department avoids discussing the embarrassing situation of the government-sanctioned killings in countries that are supported by the United States . This use of language constitutes doublespeak because it is designed to mislead, to cover up the unpleasant. Its real intent is at variance with its apparent intent. It is language designed to alter our perception of reality.

A second kind of doublespeak is jargon, the specialised language of a trade, profession, or similar group. It is the specialised language of doctors, lawyers, engineers, educators, or car mechanics. Jargon can serve an important and useful function. Within a group, jargon allows members of the group to communicate with each other clearly, efficiently, and quickly. Indeed, it is a mark of membership in the group to be able to use and understand the group’s jargon.

THE LETTER J WAS THE NEWEST ADDITION TO THE ENGLISH ALPHABET. The letter “J” is the tenth letter of the alphabet used for the modern English Language. It is also used in a number of other languages, including French, German, and Spanish. The letter “J” evolved from the letter “I,” so the early development of the two letters is the same.

Our J was developed from tenth letter of the Phoenician alphabet, “YOD.” The Phoenicians used the letter to represent the beginning “Y” sound of YOD, which was their word for hand. When the Greeks adapted the Phoenician alphabet around 800 B.C., they used the letter, which they named “iota,” for the sound of the vowel that is much like the consonant “Y.” The Etruscans adopted the Greek alphabet about 700 B.C. and the Romans adopted the Etruscans alphabet in 650 B.C. Both peoples continued to use “I” in this way.

In Europe, in the Middle Ages (A.D. 400’s through the 1400’s) scribes began writing a lengthened form of “I” at the end of a word. They used this form especially for a Roman Numeral, such as VIII (the numeral for eight). After the invention of printing in the late 1400’s, the long- tailed “I,” which began to look like “J” was used at the beginning of a word, while an ordinary “I” was used in the middle. “J” began to be used for the consonant sound in France around about 1620, and the English printers soon followed this practice. The first English language book to make a clear distinction between “I” and “j” was published in 1633. “I” and “J” were not considered to be separate letters until 1801, with the publication of William Perry’s Royal Standard English Dictionary. Perry’s dictionary was the first to alphabetise words separately under “I” and “J.”

THE Scandinavian nations constitute together a branch that in early times became detached from the great folk-tree which we usually call the Gothic-Germanic (or Teutonic) race. This branch embraces the inhabitants of Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Iceland. The latter be­longs, though merely in a political sense, to Denmark. In the following review of the intellectual life of these nations, as it has, in the course of time, found expression in litera­ture, we propose to consider the inhabitants of the four countries named collectively, although they at the present

time, not only in politics, but also in many other respects, possess strongly marked national individualities, and differ one from the other in many things. We feel justified in so doing for the reason that they, in spite of differences, and in spite of all the feuds and conflicts that have divided them in the past, still in reality constitute a unity, which, quite unlike the other European peoples, even those which are most nearly related to one another, has acquired to the close observer a common physiognomy.

They are sister-nations, which, with the changes that time has wrought, have in some respects been developed each in her own peculiar manner. They have frequently met as foes, but in spite of this, they have preserved the mark of kin­ship, that became their common inheritance when they separated from the great race whence they sprang, to shift for themselves. In all essential respects they have given the world an intellectual product differing from all others, both in character and form, though of course continually influenced by the other streams of European culture. The fact that the northern peoples, from an intellectual stand­point, formed a national unity, that they were imbued and influenced by one and the same national spirit, was never for a moment lost sight of by the ancient inhabitants of the North; later it was somewhat obscured, though it was never utterly forgotten; and in our time the Scandinavian peoples have again become thoroughly conscious of their intimate kinship. ” The age of sundering is past,” said one of Sweden’s greatest poets half a century ago, and in spite of the political separation, the sentiment that ” we are one people, Scandinavians we are called,” as a Danish poet has sung, has during the past fifty years been growing continually stronger.

We have come a long way since it was realised that whoever controls the media in any country controls most minds in that country. Today, TV the most powerful mass drug in history exerts more power and influence over the mass mind than any king or despot in history. Its long arm reaches into almost every home in the land and people spend hours every day of every year glued to the little screen.

By a process of gradualism people have been led to accept sodomy, lesbianism, miscegenation, sadism, gratuitous violence, profanity and perversion by the bucket full. Screaming, yelling and gyrating goons with about as much musical talent as monkeys in a cage, entertain and captivate most of the younger generation. While their parents watch the latest saga of Eastenders or Emmerdale with everyone jumping in and out of bed with everyone else. While Sky promotes scantily clad tarts, trolls and strumpets who wriggle around to the requests of viewers.

Sky History is even more entertaining with regular ‘Hitler bashing programmes’ demonstrating to us all that Hitler was a sadistic sexual deviant, a megalomaniac, a power crazed monster bent on conquering the world. Sky’s version of history, especially the history of WW2 is a fallacious fabrication — more fiction than fact. All of this and more is transparently clear to any thinking person with a modicum of sense.

Saladin 1138-1193

ONCE UPON A TIME THERE WAS A GREAT SON OF ISLAM WHOSE NAME WAS SALADIN. It was he who united the Arabs into a solid wall of resistance to the Crusader invasion of the Holy Land. It was he who thwarted the Crusaders at every turn. His acts of bravery, chivalry and generosity to both friend and foe are spoken of throughout Islam in tones of awe, for Saladin was unlike any son of Esau who went before or has come after.

His exploits are legion and are related from father to son in lonely desert oasis as well as being written in the world’s history books. His military exploits are common knowledge. How he consolidated his power is not common knowledge.

Saladin’s Problem

The Arab world was in turmoil. Just as stability had been achieved in the Arab world, it was struck from the east by fierce invaders from the Mongolian deserts. Turning to meet this threat it was struck from behind by Christian Crusaders from Western Europe who had seemingly materialized from nowhere. The Islamic world fragmented. Little Islamic kingdoms sprang up governed by warlords who fought the Christians and each other, but who owed no real allegiance to anyone but Allah.

At this time there was a great Arab king who was Sultan of Egypt and Syria. His armies had blunted and then defeated the invasion of the fierce invaders from the east. He then turned to deal with the powerful Christian Crusaders from the West. But, before he could really begin his task, he died.

The Alphabet trail from “Discovery of the Ark of the Covenant” by Wilson and Blackett
.
This page is well hidden at the back of this large book (page 348) and I thought it worth sharing.

1 Julius Caesar described the ancient British Alphabet circa 55 BC.

2 Ammianus Marcellinus also described the British Alphabet and actually stated that the Greeks got their Alphabet from the British

3 An Alphabet is identically described, and matching British records, in the Nag Hamadi documents of the Gnostic church that were buried before AD 400 and discovered in 1945.

4 A large number of Khumric mediaeval poets mentioned and described the ancient British Alphabet starting with Daffydd ap Gwilym died AD 1367 and going onto around AD 1475.

5 Rhys Goch of Oswestry wrote a poem lampooning this Coelbren Alphabet in AD 1582

6 Therefore allegations that this ancient. British Alphabet is a fake that was forged around AD 1800 are ludicrous

OFTEN IN THESE STUDIES here on this web site we mention something called the controlled media.  We state that many things which are going on today regarding the formation of the New World Order (which is just a modern name for the Biblical “first beast” global control system of Revelation chapter 13, that precedes the “second beast” [antichrist/Satan] by 42 months) are hidden from the average persons eye by this “controlled media.”

From a 1936 series of International Judaic speeches at the B’nai B’rith[B’nai B’rith in the Judaic Parent organization of the world-wide Jewish  Anti Defamation League]

“…As long as there remains among the Gentiles any moral conception of the social order, and until all faith, patriotism, and dignity are uprooted, our [International Judaics] reign over the world shall not come …And the Gentiles, in their stupidity, have proved easier dupes than we expected them to be. One would expect more intelligence and more practical common sense, but they are no better than a herd of sheep. Let them graze in our fields till they become fat enough to be worthy of being immolated to our future King of the World [Satan/antichrist]…
…Martin Luther [the leader of the Great Reformation] yielded to the influence of his Jewish friends unknowingly, and again, by Jewish authority, and with Jewish finance, his plot against the Catholic Church met with success. But unfortunately he discovered the deception, and became a threat to us, so we disposed of him as we have so many others who dare to oppose us [Martin Luther may have been slowly poisoned to death] ..

A small fragment of this highly confidential interview was published in August, 1976. At that time, we simply stated that the Jew, Mr. X, was an “administrative assistant to one of this nation’s top ranking senators.” There must have been a leak as to the identity of Mr. X, or the interview may have been bugged, for since that time Harold Wallace Rosenthal, 29, the administrative assistant to Senator Jacob K. Javits (left) of New York, was killed in an alleged skyjacking attempt on an Israeli airliner in Istanbul, Turkey on Aug. 12, 1976. It is amazing that of all the people involved in this incident Mr. X should have been fatally wounded. He was not killed by a random bullet, and this simply confirms the truth of this sensational interview.

Part 1 published in “The Battle Ax”, Issue 103, August, 1976 under the title “Jews Amazed By Christian Stupidity”

In a highly confidential interview with a Jewish administrative assistant to one of this nation’s ranking senators, he said, “It is a marvel that the American people do not rise up and drive every Jew out of this country.”

The Jew, Mr. X, made this statement after admitting Jewish dominance in all significant national programs. He said, “We Jews continue to be amazed with the ease by which Christian Americans have fallen into our hands. While the naive Americans wait for Khrushchev to bury them, we have taught them to submit to our every demand.”

THE AUTHORS OR EDITORS ARE ANONYMOUS. A prosecution against Jane Birdwood was (as far as I’ve been able to determine) dropped, with the probably bogus claim that she was senile or otherwise mentally impaired, leaving the document’s copyright status uncertain—it seems to be in a legal limbo. It’s reproduced below without any omissions or interpolations (including note references, so there are no links back to the top of the page). The paragraphing and bold and italic typefaces are exactly as in the original—or, if they aren’t, that’s my mistake.
I’m told the material on Darwin in the appendix was included at the request of a friend of Birdwood’s.
According to recent newspaper obituaries, Joan Pollock Graham, after RADA and adopting the name ‘Jane’ to avoid confusion with a radio actress, and working as a secretary or organiser, met Lieutenant Colonel the Hon Christopher Birdwood in 1947, in Germany, where he worked with the British Red Cross. He was married, but Joan/Jane seems to have ousted his wife by going to live with him in London two or three years later. He died in 1962; she died on June 28th 2000, aged 87, which reminded me that I had a copy of this pamphlet. The Times obituary says: ‘.. In 1991 she was tried at the Old Bailey on ten charges under the 1986 Public Order Act.. found guilty on all ten counts, given a three-month suspended prison sentence, and ordered to pay £500 towards prosecution costs. [sic] .. She continued distributing crazed pamphlets with titles such as “The Longest Hatred” and “The Snides of March”, was prosecuted again, and given a second suspended jail sentence. ..’ The Times failed to mention her third prosecution, beginning 5th Jan 1998, which seems to have been dropped when she refused to undertake to discontinue her publishing.

Cloak of Nimrod

NIMROD HAD A CLOAK. When he wore the cloak all who heard him believed him and became his servants. He used these servants to build Babylon and the great Tower of Babel.

Esau hid in ambush and killed Nimrod and stole his cloak[1]. Fleeing from Nimrod’s bodyguards he rushed exhausted to Jacob and sold him his birth right in exchange for food. He believed that his birth right was worthless because he would soon be killed.

Esau lost his birth right, but his descendants obtained the Cloak and became powerful. They fought Jacob’s descendants and also fought among themselves. Their internecine warfare caused them more distress than had the war with Jacob, so they agreed never to be ruled by one of their own kind again. They agreed to always be ruled by a foreigner[2].

Turkey saw its greatest days when ruled by foreigners called Janissaries (Turkish – “white slaves”. Egypt became great ruled by foreigners who were slaves. These appointed slave-rulers abused their adopted countries and so the Turks and Egyptians slew them – and both countries immediately declined in power and wealth.

Today, Esau’s rulers are again appointed by strangers who operate under the shadowy name of The International Trade Cartel” (ITC).

Professor Carroll Quigley in his book Tragedy and Hope[3] had this to say about this system:

TWEEDLEDUM & TWEEDLEDEE.

For a month past there has been a war of words between Socialists and Communists. Were the Socialists sincere in their announced detestation of the greater evil they would be worthy of support from all men of good will, but their actions merely show that they are ex­periencing a certain amount of discomfort from their association with the extremists. While the means which our Socialists have it in mind to employ may not be so utterly lacking in humanity as those used in Russia, the aim is the same, and it is only when Socialists not only say that they detest Communism, but take steps quite different from associating themselves with it in other countries that we can begin to believe that they mean what they say. Until then their rebuking of sin has no conviction in it: they are too much contaminated.

The late Lord Sydenham writing in THE PATRIOT of 29 March, 1923, had a most in­structive article on the activities of the late Mr Snowden who then was the big noise in Socia­lism. It was Mr. Snowden in particular follow­ing in the steps of Marx, who, concentrating his attacks on the capitalist system, was simply serving up a rehash of Marxian doctrines. In those days we were told by Mr. Snowden that the “Capitalist system” had failed “to deliver the goods,” that it did not “give the people a good world in which to live,” that it did not adequately “utilise natural resources and pro­ductive power” or provide continuous work at good wages for the whole population, and that it could not solve the housing problem. This is exactly what our Socialists are still telling us day in, day out: they have made no progress in their technique and the country under 2½ years of misrule has seen what a sorry substitute is the Socialist system for that of the “Capita­list” or as we should prefer to call it free enterprise.

But the point is that Marx, the founder of Communism, was the inspiration of Mr. Snowden and his followers in those days just as he is of the Socialists to-day. And here is what Lord Sydenham had to say on this point:

“The revolutionaries of the Eighteenth Century, from whom Marx borrowed all his theories, did not and could not attack a “capitalist system” in days when great organised industries had not come into exist­ence. They did, however, promise the millennium, and they quickly found, after calculations, that it was unattainable except by a wholesale massacre of the French people, which they attempted to carry out. The Bolshevists have similarly compassed the death, by murder, starvation, and disease of nearly 20,000,000 Russians, mostly, of course, peasants and workers. Babeuf, whom Marx followed, and whom the Labour Party have copied under his instructions, held that property “had fallen into a few hands,” and that “to take the mass of citizens out of their dependence there was no way but to place all property in the hands of the Gov­ernment.”

Though Mr. Snowden was eager to explain that “there was no analogy between Socialism and Bolshevism,” it was the programme of the Bolsheviks carried out in Russia with such appalling results, that he and his followers were advocating. The hypocrisy of the Socialists is still such that it will not admit the identity of purpose. And when Communism in our midst and Soviet policy are denounced by our Socialist Ministers it seems to be forgotten that during the Election in 1945 the Socialists were promis­ing good relations between this country and Moscow with the confident assertions that their Party alone could procure those good relations, It was of course only one of the usual false promises taking no regard of the fact that Com­munism is a world power and that in every country their followers are under the direction of the Kremlin, whose orders and instructions have to be obeyed.

COMMUNISM CAN BE DEFEATED

IN the summer of 1937 the Swiss people took a vote on the subject of passing a law to proclaim as illegal ” the associations and organisations affiliated directly or indirectly with the Communist International.” It may be added that the Swiss Constitution bars citizens of a Foreign Power from exercising political rights in the country and, under the new proposal, those affiliated with the Communist Interna­tional were to be deprived of political rights. It was pointed out then in these columns, nearly 11 years ago, that it was time this country adopted some such steps as those taken in Switzerland against the agents of the Soviet Government.

Switzerland, of course, had had ample reason for taking steps, Canton by Canton, against the Communists, for Lenin, Trotsky, and many other refugees, had abused Swiss hospitality. The Soviet representative at Berne in November, 1918, was found to have been behind the general strike engineered at that time, and the long spell of disorders was traced to Communist activities. As a result, the Swiss authorities broke off relations with Soviet Russia, and in 1937 the Cantons of Neufchatel and Geneva prohibited Communism.

In the campaign for the interdiction of Communism a Genevan advocate, M. Eugene Gaulis, played a prominent part and issued a sheet on “The Communist Programme,” which contained the following as given in THE PATRIOT of December 16, 1937:

“Experience has proved that in all countries where the Communist Party has tried to seize power by provoking bloody disorders, it was com­posed only of a small number of members, and notwithstanding that constituted a formidable power of revolution and destruction. In Spain, at the 1936 elections, the Communist Party only elected 16 Deputies out of 470 in Parliament. In France the ‘Front Populaire’ Government (the lucky-find of Dimitroff, general secretary of the Communist International) is prisoner of the Communists, who have only 72 Deputies out of more than 600 in the Chamber. Revolutions, history proves, have always been made by disciplined minorities.

Last week we drew attention to the report, casually mentioned by a Dantzig Chronicler of the year 1469, that the German merchant (den deutschen Kaufmann) had a hand in our “Wars of the loses. Strange! And yet perhaps no more strange than to suggest that the German merchant of to-day has a hand in the Rebellion in Ireland and Bolshevism in Russia (and in England). When Rathenau, the greatest commercial magnate in Germany, signs a Treaty with Lenin, we are told that the nation and the Prime Minister are of the material of shipping — timber, resin, pitch. Mercatores de regno Alemanie, “find it commonly translated,” The Society of German Merchants of the Holy Roman Empire.” They were a great confederation of some seventy German cities, chiefly Lubeck, Dantzic, Bremen, Hamburg and Cologne. These merchants traded on the principle of “touch one, touch all,” and had a navigation law of their own shortly ex- pi-eased in the phrase, “Hanse goods in Hanse ships.” In the Baltic they had almost a monopoly

When Ivrassin (an old employee of Rathenau) came to England as representative of Lenin, it did not occur to the Prime Minister or the British nation to put two and two together. Nor did it occur to them to read Mr. Edgar Sisson’s Report, which states (and proves) that the Russian Communists (falsely called Russian and falsely called Communist) were in the pay of German capitalism. To people who neither read nor can interpret evidence, everything comes as a surprise.

Here is one of the advantages of the study of history. If we know that the German merchant had a share in the Mediaeval Bolshevism of the Wars of the Roses, we learn to expect him in the Bolshevism of to-day. And so it may help us a little in our modern affairs to go back even so far as Warwick, the King-Maker. But who, let us first .discover, were those German merchants? And why did they take a hand in the Wars of the Roses? Let us see.

The German merchants of the Middle Ages were organised in what is vaguely and inaccurately called the Hanseatic League. A Hanse was, in fact, a league or company of merchants, and there was an English Hanse as well as a German Hanse. The German Hanse called itself in State documents “Mercatores de Hansa Alemannia,”

SIXTY-FOUR years ago this month, six million Americans became unwitting subjects in an experiment in psychological warfare.
It was the night before Halloween, 1938. At 8 p.m. CST, the Mercury Radio on the Air began broadcasting Orson Welles’ radio adaptation of H. G. Wells’ War of the Worlds. As is now well known, the story was presented as if it were breaking news, with bulletins so realistic that an estimated one million people believed the world was actually under attack by Martians. Of that number, thousands succumbed to outright panic, not waiting to hear Welles’ explanation at the end of the program that it had all been a Halloween prank, but fleeing into the night to escape the alien invaders.

Later, psychologist Hadley Cantril conducted a study of the effects of the broadcast and published his findings in a book, The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic. This study explored the power of broadcast media, particularly as it relates to the suggestibility of human beings under the influence of fear. Cantril was affiliated with Princeton University’s Radio Research Project, which was funded in 1937 by the Rockefeller Foundation. Also affiliated with the Project was Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member and Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) executive Frank Stanton, whose network had broadcast the program. Stanton would later go on to head the news division of CBS, and in time would become president of the network, as well as chairman of the board of the RAND Corporation, the influential think tank which has done ground-breaking research on, among other things, mass brainwashing.

Here follows a lengthy analysis and study of the Jewish media-occupation in Great Britain. Written in 1997 and partially updated 2002, this text describes the present state of affairs when it comes to Jewish media power in Great Britain. It is crucial, in the battle against the Jewish racist totalitarianism, to have a basic knowledge about the Jewish media-dictatorship-monopoly and about the political power the Zionists possess and who are – as Jewish political actors – the leaders of this Jewish Power.