- WNBS January 1963
- WNBS 6th January
- WNBS 13th January
- WNBS 27th January
- WNBS 3rd February
- WNBS 10th February
- WNBS 24th February
- WNBS 3rd March
- WNBS 10th March
- WNBS 24th March
- WNBS 31st March
- WNBS 7th April
- WNBS 14th April
- WNBS 28th April
- WNBS 5th May
- WNBS 12 May
- WNBS 26th May
- WNBS 2nd June
- WNBS 9th June
- WNBS 16th June
- WNBS 30th June
- WNBS 7th July
- WNBS 14th July
- WNBS 4th August
- WNBS 11 August
- WNBS 18th August
- WNBS 25th August
- WBNS 15th September
- WNBS 29th September
- WNBS 6th October
- WNBS 13th October
- WNBS 3rd November
- WNBS 10th November
- WNBS 1st December
- WNBS -8th December
- WNBS 29th December
QUESTION: Who are the Hunza people of Northern India? Are they white people? We would like a comment on these people.
ANSWER: When Alexander the Great was pushing toward the East and finally stormed the heights of the Himalayas, he was preparing for an attack upon India. Alexander the Great was basically, of course, in his recognition of white leadership. For he thought that with Macedonia and Greece united, he would have a strong opportunity to carry the areas of victory over to the Aryan Persians. The Aryan Persians came down from the North. They had fought no battles were moving for a pincher movement upon the Mongolians coming out of the Steppes. Alexander wanted to move with one force of his army across the Himalayas while with the other, he would move down on India where Hinduism was running rampant. His design was to crush Hinduism and put white leadership over the areas of India and join with the white Persians coming down out of the Steppes. And of course the strong Aryan control which has been over India had been somewhat overturned by this massive Hindu area of victories. The Emperor had fought against the Aryan Emperor. And the Aryan Emperor was over the most populated and civilized area of India, but the Hindu Emperor had gathered the great masses of Hindus back along the mountain ranges of the Himalayas. And realizing there was an Aryan Emperor who had left the areas of his basic throne, and had moved into Mantelet, this Hindu Emperor moved in. The concept of Alexander the Great was to push for the conquest of India. He also wanted to bring this other arm of his forces up to join with the Persians. And then they would come down through the passes into India.
Question: Is a Jew a Mongrel?
Answer: Well yes, but you could have a mongrel without it being a Jew. You could have a mongrel come out of any, say, a South Sea Islander and a Chinese who would not necessarily have been out of Cain or Lucifer’s line. A Jew has to come down from the Luciferian fallen Angel line sowed into the various races. You sow different Jews together and you just get Jewish mongrels, all colours of Jews. In other words if you have a Chinese Jew and a Negro Jew you only come up with another mixture of Jews. But if any of a Jewish line mixed in with any other then you just have a Jew, there is no such thing as a part Jew.
Question: Doesn’t God put any of His Holy Seed into a mongrel?
Answer: No!
Question: Well, do you think the Devil would pass up that seed?
Answer: Now wait a moment, the Issue of the Adamic seed is the only Holy seed in the earth. Therefore if this seed intermingles with another race there is no spiritual seed in the posterity because there is nothing there to have affinity with. The Chinese for instance, they would be existent as creative people and they have their own seed after they were created, for ‘seed having life in itself’ is the rule. Therefore they are not the offspring of God, but creations of God, and were good before their fall. So He does not supply seed for the increasing posterity under the subordination of Lucifer, while worshiping the Darkness. All they do then is have a cycle of return. Every Asiatic then who is born in a re‑incarnated spirit until the restoration of all things. But there is no new seed for expansion. This is why the kingdom of darkness does not get beyond the point which it was in for the hour of its fall, although existent by the millions.
QUESTION: I have heard the word mentioned here of Inner-earth.
ANSWER: Yes, a lot of people in there might want out. Ha.
QUESTION: Where does choice or self‑will come into ones experience?
ANSWER: Well, it is with self‑will that people get into trouble. In the first place our race came out of the Celestial, being begotten in the Celestial of the spirit. Then of course we will only go briefly into this because most of you now know that the Celestial plains are dimensions of light, energy and organization. And that it is no less a tangible realm just because it is spiritual than there is in a physical plain. We are going to classify these words: consciously, repetitiously, continually because one can’t understand anything concerning the plains of spirit until they realize it is just a dimension.
And that as we talk about something being spiritual it is a plain of Light, it is a dimension in which a Celestial being is formed. And of course there are many plains in Gods Universe. We have the electronic plain which is the plain of all material creation which can be tested in the chemical law. Anything which can come through the test tubes, anything which reflects the particles of light, and has a spectrographic analyst, and can be synthesized in electronic energy, protons, electrons, so this again is the physical dimension. The spiritual dimension is a dimension of Light, and Light has weight, has particles, has velocities. Light can be slowed down by the density of what it travels through, by environment, by different wave lengths of different vibratory fields outside of its own.
QUESTION: Esau was hairy and not liked very well, but I am sort of hairy also, and I wondered about this?
ANSWER: What do you wonder about? This hasn’t anything to do with any particular line, it is a factor which is generally hereditary, and of the genes. But as far as Esau was concerned then Esau and Jacob are extremely well marked, almost as well marked as the difference between Cain and Abel, although not quite as well.
The question has existed in the background of the ancient theology surrounding these two, especially as to how it relates to their nature and so forth, as to whether they were children of a common father. This is a part of the pattern, back in the ancient Zohar and other old writings. It was thought that Jacob and Esau were not full brother, the fact is Esau married into the Asiatic Hill Country Tungus people.
At the same time, the lines which he married into were tied into the Canaanites and Mongolians. They were Steppe people who had come in, and they were from the forbidden people. The symbol inside the scripture of Esau being first born would give him the birthright. But him selling his birthright for a mess of portage actually this was only a symbol. What he did was to marry outside the race line into forbidden seed, and he chose to live and dwell with these people rather than with his own race, so this was when he sold his birthright.
QUESTION: Did you see the program on T.V. about Stonehenge? And was it authentic?
ANSWER: I did not see it as I was away from home, but we know how it was built and by whom. It was built by our ancestors, and built prior to the advent of Israel into the Isles. It was built by Aryans who had proceeded them, and they had gone to Avebury because this was to be located at the very place they wanted it to be. There was also Do‑Ring’s over on the Persian Gulf like this, and up in Burma in the Himalaya Mountains. Our forbearers had gone into India from there given them the highest order of civilization they had ever seen, had sent their savants into the highlands of Burma, and there set another Stonehenge. These 3 citing places, like the Great Pyramid were set to measure, not only for the procession of the equinoxes, but with them they could measure accurately the furthermost areas of the positioning of the moon and its changes, over the cycle of years as every six to nine years there is an alternating cycle, but they set those stones so perfectly that they could get the exact movement in relation to the planets of the Solar System, and their alignments. And they were watching and using this not only for the complete dates for the equinoxes, but they were waiting for certain configurations in the heavens. The one which was most important for them was for this Embodiment and coming of the Messiah.
BEFORE WE GO INTO THE QUESTIONS, WE MIGHT JUST MENTION SOMETHING MRS. WOODARD was talking about, in the Book of Revelation. Whereas what pertained to the Book of Revelation might not pertain to any other Book unless some area of prophecy, but we think this is rather unique about it for it is fraudulent and John never wrote it. John wrote the Book of Revelation but there are lots of things translated today which he never wrote, and this is rather interesting, for you can take the lexicons and you can also go back into the earliest of the codices of the Greek and you find this is true. John never wrote in Greek, he wrote entirely in Aramaic.
It was translated from Aramaic to Greek. This work was laboriously done down in Alexandria, Egypt where Mark was pastor of the Christian church there. Now; at the end of the Book, this was never existent until about the 3rd., century, when this passage was put in this Book and it said: ‘If any man shall take away from the words of this Book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life, and out of the holy city, and from the things written in this Book.’ In the first place when you look at that verse you know it was phoney from the word go because the Book of Life was written before the foundation of the world. God said: those HE did foreknow, HE did pre‑determine that they would conform to the image of the son (embodiment).
(Current events) The Mohammed Elijah movement is the building of the Negro Revolution. This came, remember, in the fall of 1964.
The moment the statute of limitations in Germany runs out, the Jews have to extend it one more time or they are in trouble. The World Court says there is no precedent for trying anyone for war crimes. But the Jews cry, extend the time. And they win.
QUESTION: About a year ago you answered a question on prayer. You said at that time that a lot of people get on the phone, so to speak, and call God. And they say their piece then hang up before they can receive any instructions. I would like to ask what is the method or the technique, or how do you know you are receiving instructions? Say, you pray for guidance when you have a big decision coming and you want to make the right decision?
ANSWER:- Well we did say that most people just tell God when really you don’t tell God anything. You may not realize it but some people just talk to God, and this is sometimes just an exercise. Prayer is something that perhaps, sometimes by long repetitions of the use of the same phrases, and it has become kind of a religious exercise. And of course it follows that there are passages which say prayer without ceasing. We sometimes run into people who make quite an issue out of the fact that they spend quite a bit of time in prayer. When asked as to what procedure they used, I find that they just set down and tell god for about two hours what they have on their mind. Having told God all these things then they ask Him for a lot of things, and then indicate that they have just communicated some things to God.
QUESTION: About the Pyramids in Mexico, about their background and how do they compare with those in Egypt?
ANSWER: Well, the Pyramids of Mexico are real Ancient and they go back into Pre‑Mayan times or very early Mayan Kingdoms. There is a possibility that some of the later Pyramids buildings are by Mayans themselves of this Step Pyramid building for this was influenced by the Tribe of Manasseh who came over about 760 B.C., and came into Central America from the Caribbean. Of course this was the coming of the White God of the skies whose children were to come. According to old prophecies they had almost in all the records of the Ancient people in South and Central America some record of the expected coming of these white sons of the Eternal God of the Heavens. But the most developed areas of it was among the Mayas. The Toltecs were also a very old civilization like the Maya, and we know that the Manasseh people, to the Maya, were received as the Divine Off‑spring of the God of the Sky. They effected the culture of the Maya, and even the Toltec to some extent in that time, but then Aztec demon gods got involved later, and the Asiatic Aztec gods were very evil, demonic things. The Mayans were a much more peaceful society, and their culture was advanced by the coming of the white man. And they included in their records the knowledge of such things as the flood of Noah’s time. They have this woven into the Mayan traditions but in weaving these in they relate themselves to it. In other words, this is all in their history of this race of the heavens and so forth. So this being true then there was some changes made in their architecture, in their temples, in the Yucatan, but the temples around Mexico city go back 11,000 or more years. These Temples are covered with lava and radio carbon precludes their great antiquity.
(As you read this transcript of this old tape I want you to notice just how close the enemy was to their objective back in 1965, but for the Grace of God, America would not be where she is today.)
QUESTION: What are the latest developments in this continuing war against the enemy?
ANSWER: Well, we have had investigators everywhere, and as for Captain Gates who happens to be the chief intelligence officer of a nation wide secret police, who probably has this meeting bugged, he is higher than the Police Department, and answers only to the President’s group. But the program is that America is on the edge of a total dictatorship unless we on the RIGHT win. It will be just like the OGPU everywhere else, there will be no where to go as they plan to pull the rug everywhere at the same time. There isn’t any doubt that the design was to get us (this is speaking of the night that the Swift group were stopped, and with guns made to lay on the ground face down with the guns in their backs.) Afterwards they said that they were after some deadly armed Communists. And they had their orders at the least resistance to kill.
So the Gates department set up the wrong information in their briefing because no other organization would list you as a desperate armed criminal. This is just a part of the plan, but you have no police protection. So Patriots be warned, the Alabama affair (Selma March), this Negro uprising is just what was planned, they are just stepping it up as an excuse to go after all Patriots, or people who oppose integration.
QUESTION: Do we bury the dead?
ANSWER: From its earliest conception an instruction that bears on the eventual pattern of Resurrection it says: Yes. Now, as far as the elements of composition are concerned they may be reduced to ashes, and the body turned into gas by the process of cremation, but they will still always be existent somewhere. Our race has always been taught to pay respect to the body, to embalm and to bury it. In fact our race taught the Egyptians the process of embalming the body, to embalm and bury it.
The Egyptians knew nothing of embalming until after Enoch and Job went down and built the great city of ON and its great temple, then later erected the pyramid. Our race was referred to by the Egyptians as the children of YAH, the Ka of Light and Resurrection. In other words they identified our race with the embodiment of God, the embodiment of the God of Light and Resurrection. So it was early taught that it was our race who taught Resurrection to the Egyptians, and that the body was to be laid away until the Resurrection Day.
In fact this is also demonstrated by the fact that the Egyptians had two Resurrections, and the early doctrines surrounding our race established the fact that one of the things which would be restored to it was Immortality. And that the spirit never dies, it took its flight into dimensions of Spirit in what was known as death. Thus the Egyptians were one of the first to catch the concept of the spirit taking its flight, outside the Adamic race. You will also note that the Egyptians had the concept of the soul crossing the River Styx into a Netherworld until it was Resurrected. Then when resurrected its soul could take flight into the sky or its soul might be resident in the earth. This was sort of a combination change made in the theology of the Early Egyptians, and they early adjusted some what to what they heard.
QUESTION: Could you give us a little more on the woman that Cain married?
ANSWER: We have quite a bit of background material, Zohar information, early discussions and material from the Patriarchs, things which came up in the Zohar conversation records, the things like the writings of Seth, and so forth. We know that Cain went eastward into the land of Nod, and he took a wife from among the Akkads. But prior to this time he had also consorted with a Negress because this was classified as, among the Beasts of the earth and was not acceptable and this was one of the things besides being Luciferian that said that nothing Cain could produce would be an acceptable sacrifice, for he had violated this principal law.
There is a passage over here in the Book of Genesis as God talks about this Violation of Divine Law to Cain. He charges Cain and his COMPANIONS in plurality. This is interesting and proves that Cain and his companions have to absorb their own transgressions, as he runs them out. Thus it is plural in statement which is made to Cain. This is later discussed among the Patriarchs, and among the religious teachers later, about the fact that one of the first things that Cain did was marry into the lower Bestial orders.
QUESTION: What were the words Jesus said on the Cross if they weren’t, ‘Why hast thou forsaken me?’
ANSWER: You mean: li, E‑li, La‑ma, Sa‑bach, Tha‑ni? It wasn’t actually, why has thou forsaken me, although this was the way it was translated into Greek and into Latin, etc. This is the human spirit which cries out as the soul is about to leave the body. The soul consciousness cries out, Oh, Great Spirit (God) wouldest that this need not happen. If the Greek translation would have stayed with the Aramaic in which it was originally written the cry would have been: that the flesh now felt the spirit leaving it, and knew that it was abandoned unto to death, and this was the flesh that now speaks. But, then it adds, An Dias, in Latin, or So be the will of Deity. So the flesh recognizes the sovereignty of the spirits right to go, and knew that the fullness of God dwelt bodily in HIM. So these words were, well, to put your hands on these words in the original text except you put your hands on the Old Alexandrian Codex, whereas they took it from the old original Aramaic text, .this is impossible for most today. But the Aramaic from the Book of John and other Gospels were to mention this in the 7 cries of the Cross, and from study you realize that the flesh now cried out in agony as the spirit was leaving it. It cried out because it was suffering, but it also was willing to receive this because of the Will of the Spirit. See? But the cry is a great anguish cry as far as theology is concerned. But anytime you get any display, upon the body of God of unwillingness, this is error. Because he fully was willing to do anything which was to be done. The only thing He did in anguish was to create a background for the intensity of what was involved. So again when He said; ‘It is finished’, it was with full cognition that the Spirit was leaving the body, and it would die, within a few moments. See? But He knew, and He released the Spirit. If He had wanted to He could have kept the spirit in the body and stayed there on the Cross for days. In fact He could have come down from the Cross if He had wanted to. But this would gainsay His own purpose, because this was the body of God which was carrying the physical suffering.
QUESTION: This story about Three bulls coming out of the ark, in the Book of Enoch, a Red one, a White one.
ANSWER: Enoch never wrote about anything like three bulls coming out of the Ark. This is only inserted into the Oxford Edition, I never found out how it got in there, and it was an old copy, so this was, BULL, coming out of the Ark. It was quite obvious that they were trying to say that Chinese, White, and Negroes were all coming out of the Ark, but this is totally a fallacy because only Noah was spared because he was perfect in his generations. His sons and their wives were thus on the Ark with him, and he was still perfect in his generations, thus all these were white men and women of this you can be sure.
QUESTION: A destruction of the unrighteous in the Book of Enoch, how do you justify this with the scripture saying, “All Israel shall be saved, and all flesh is to be saved.”
ANSWER: That is alright, but in the midst of the judgments in the battle of the ending of the age, all the forces of evil fighting against the Kingdom are going to die, they are going to be defeated, broken, smashed. This is the destruction not the destruction which relates to their entity, or their being, as it relates to the endless future. It doesn’t make any difference who or what is destroyed, the scripture also talks about a general Resurrection, and this general Resurrection takes care of all the opposition, the evil, all the wicked who have died. But this Resurrection is before a judgment of chastisement, but ultimately there is nothing lost beyond the ability of God in the fullness of time, to redeem.
QUESTION: How do you explain; and the earth also shall be burned up. Peter 3‑13?
ANSWER: This is referring to the World Order, and is found also in the Book of Isaiah. The Scripture says this earth shall be the habitation of man forever and forever. And then God declares the earth is His Footstool. Then of the Increase of His Kingdom there shall be no end, and upon the Throne of David to establish and order it. Then there is another place where it refers to the sun, moon, and stars as enduring forever. The Psalmist declares the earth will be the habitation of man forever and forever. So, the fashion of the world passes away.
The Cosmos, earth order changes, but the earth itself never is totally destroyed because it has a Destiny which never ends. It reaches out to the endless tomorrows, the outer earth has been injured dozens of times and yet it is still here. Continents have sunk, mountains arose, plateaus came, and valleys disappeared. Each time this happened the earth has been injured, but as far as this word: What manner of people ought we to be when the earth is dissolved in fervent heat? It is a matter of translation and interpretation for God has declared the earth is to remain forever. There is no way for the earth to be destroyed by fire, it could be molten and still be here, this is not the intent.
QUESTION: Would you want to explain your statement that there is more than one judgment, and the different Resurrections?
ANSWER I don’t want to get into that tonight, but I will say that judgments are constant. This idea that the judgments are set up for one specific time is erroneous. Judgements are constant, there are continual judgements based on the law of existence. So what so ever has been put together in the exactness of His law are constant, continual judgements, and come by the continual violations of the law. Whether the economic, political or social law still the law exists backing its judgments. Violate the law of proper rotations of the soil, and you soon destroy the soil, its life and vitality. You don’t have to wait for judgment day you have it immediately. Violate the economic law and the mechanics which you create already starts the shortage with in the structure of the circulation of money. You can’t take a high percentage out of the production merely for the use of money without eventually shorting a whole area of exchange. This is why usury is a violation of Divine law, and usury always destroys itself with depressions, and crashes, and it can only build up so far and then it wipes itself out, it carries its own judgment.
The areas of moral law does this also, it leads to broken homes, whole areas of upset social patterns. We have tried to create around the image of God an idea of a God just working for revenge, and lots of times we may have created the idea that man sows in one field and reaps in another, and this is fallacy. You reap in the same field in which you sow, you do not sow in one field and reap in another. You don’t sow in a physical world, and reap in the Celestial, this you do not do. The processes of the violation of law creates the conditions both as to how it reacts on the nervous system, and in their areas of thinking and hypertension. Violation of Divine Law, brings about disintegration of the body, brings about conditions which bring on death. “For the wages of sin is death”.
QUESTION: The four horses of Revelation?
ANSWER: That is an all night subject. But I’ll give you a fast answer. The four horses of the Apocalypse are symbols of great earth movements for the climactic end of the age. The PALE horse is the false Peace movements: Behold, I beheld a white horse and he who sat upon it had a bow and a crown was given to him and he went forth to conquer’ and in the Scriptures the Beast System is catalogued as all the forces that do not belong to the Kingdom. God divides the world into two categories, the Hu‑man or spirit man of His Household, and the Enosh or those not of His Household. Therefore these others fall under the category of the Beast System.
And here you are not talking about animals, but people without Divine Spirit. Many of the races which existed through out the Universe were created races and had soul capacities, and some had spirit within themselves, take the early Tungus man, the first inhabitants of the earth. We find fossils and a million six hundred thousands years of their existence in our present earth. And their pre‑Cambrian and other periods show this. Now; these people had the spirit with which they were created, but the Negro then was a different creation.
QUESTION: “I feared thee because thou art an austere man; thou takest up that which thou layest not down, and reapest that thou did not sow? Would you explain?
ANSWER: This is a translation problem. The man is saying that he was afraid that if he lost it that he would have to stand the responsibility for it. What is imputed in some translations is that this man had much, he knew the symbol of the parable which related to the sovereignty of the whole kingdom, the owner of all the property was the King of the whole Kingdom, the owner of all the property was the King of the Kingdom and the whole Universe. So he said: he knew that God had everything and He did not need anymore so this man was afraid if he lost what he had he would have to stand judgment. This was his excuse for doing nothing. He said: since you don’t need it then it was better that I hid it and saved it so you didn’t lose it, and then I wouldn’t have to stand in judgment for something that you don’t have need of because you have so much. This was just an excuse for getting out of doing anything. But people would find all kinds of excuses for not helping to build the Kingdom.
QUESTION: Would you explain to me about the Samaritan’s, they were thought to be a mixed multitude of people and were spurned by Israelite’s.
QUESTION: Have you ever gone into this question about the wheels in the first book of Ezekiel?
ANSWER: .We have discussed that in various bible studies. And the Book of Ezekiel is rather hard to understand when they translated it into English because they didn’t understand what it was talking about. The Wheels are flying saucers as we would call them today, space crafts. As they translated it into English they did not understand that what Ezekiel was talking about was moving, pulsing crafts with people in them. They sort of thought there were creatures in them because they moved. Actually it was a description of the same kind of space craft as described by Enoch, and that is found in the Apocalypse of Paul, the kind we see today when we try to focus on them. But you will note that he said a whirlwind came out of the north, and a great cloud, and a fire was enfolding itself, and brightness was about, and out of the mist thereof as the colour of Amber, out of the midst of the fire.
QUESTION: Isn’t it true that some words of the Apostles were changed from their original Gospels?
ANSWER: Yes, that is true, and it is a matter of interest that many Christians don’t know this. They don’t realize that the Jews tampered with even the New Testament texts. Now the early church Gospels and Epistles were written in Aramaic and some in Greek. John wrote in Aramaic but Luke, who was a doctor, wrote in Classical Greek. Luke could have written in Aramaic and he did write some in Latin, thus showing that he had a full knowledge of Latin as well, then Matthew and Mark wrote their Gospels in Aramaic.
Now, all of these Gospels went to the early churches, and Mark was Pastor of the Church in Alexandria, Egypt. This was one of the oldest Christian Churches of Great Strength, and one of the greatest cities of the Roman Empire. This city of Alexandria, Egypt had been a great city ever since the conquering of Egypt by the Greeks, and had remained a great city in the Roman Empire.
Now, of course the Greeks were Scythians and great areas of Greek culture remained in Alexandria even after it became part of the Roman Empire. Also one of the greatest libraries of all times, in history, was established at Alexandria, Egypt, by Alexander the Great. And there were curators from all over the world who came to sell their scrolls and rolls, because this library continued to buy rare rolls and scrolls and catalogue them, even up in the days of Caesar. And even at the time of the Christ this was still a great library and depository for great volumes and here curators, both Greek and Roman paid great prices to add to this library.
QUESTION: What is the deeds of the Nicolaitans which Jesus said that He hated, who are these people of Revelation 2?
ANSWER: (Revelation 2:18‑26) These things saith the Son of God who hath his eyes like flame. This is of course is the church of Thyatira which has some of the same conditions remaining in it which is Baalism, and Nicolaitanism. There is also another passage where it refers to this similar condition, and that is in the church of Pergamos. (Rev. 2:14‑15) This doctrine of the Nicolaitan was a sort of hold over of ancient Babylonian order, which was established by ancient Jewry in ancient times.
Now, remember that Mystery Babylon the Great is the carrying forward of all the Political, the Social, the Economic, and the Religious programs of the Anti‑Christ. But to do all that he must set up some sort of symbol, some pattern, some sham in order to move in on the Kingdom. And ancient Babylon at the time of Nebuchadnezzar when they had captured Judah and Benjamin, was under the control of the Baal Priests who had a great organization. Baalism, and Baal Priests had a powerful order, in fact there were thousands of Priests, and they maintained great and tremendous Monasteries for these Priests of Baal. They kept within it like keep today in the upper Tibet and in India, under Brahma, Vishnu, Siva, and Kali in their pagan worship these thousands of Vestal Virgins. But these Vestal Virgins are virgins in name only.
QUESTION: Where did the word Jew come from?
ANSWER: It is an English word, not to old. Yehudi is the Hebrew meaning of accursed. Today the word Jew means what everyone imputes to it. In other words when we say Jew we mean those people with their hooked noses and high ears. These enemies of the Christ with their Synagogues, this is what we are talking about when we say Jew. But actually the word Jew in the King James Version is found only twice in the Old Testament. Then the word was mistranslated from the word Judah. There is no place in the New Testament for this word Jew as we know it except in these places where Christ called them Devils and sons of Lucifer, the inassimilable offspring.
QUESTION: Where can this be found?
ANSWER: In Greek and Aramaic the word was not Jew, but a word meaning those same people. The Bible was translated from Aramaic into Greek, into Latin and then into English and many words were used for these same people. But the people today called Jew are by no stretch of the imagination part of Judah, not related to Judah in any way. So the use of the word Jew started with the English translations. But these people were called, a word for Jew, before the King James Version, and in the translation of this King James Version, then there were a lots of Jews helping with the translation and they wanted everyone of Judah to be called Jews, since they were trying to usurp the name of Israel. And Jews today claim to be Israelites but they are not.
QUESTION: This teleportation, some claim they can do this?
ANSWER: You mean disappear here and arrive there? Well! I don’t buy much of it, the only area where this seems to function is in Occultism. And generally it is familiar spirits and whether they ever came from there or were here all the time is questionable. There is a high system of communication in all Celestial realms, and in other realms as well, and of course the Luciferian system is pretty well organized in their many orders, so communication is rather bad in many areas. In many Celestial realms teleportation is used if you want to use that term. We have been told that Christ can be here instantly when summoned or be there, can cross intervene miles by just instantly appearing here and disappearing over there. But there is no Biblical evidence of this. I know nothing about such happenings. So teleportation if it works would seem a more practical way to transit crossing the distance of space. But strangely enough when we have Biblical record of Christ coming to earth as He did when He brought the law to Mount Sinai, He came with 10,000 of His Saints, Administering Spirits, and His Hosts out of the Heavens. And they came in vast fleets, came over Paran and Sinai and came down, Deuteronomy 33, came throwing great search lights down over Paran. Then circled around and came down over Sinai. We know that when Christ ascended He went up on a Mount and a big cloud, hiding something without a doubt, and as Jesus was received into the cloud they didn’t see Him anymore but two men stepped out. This wasn’t something dangling out of space, this was just a cloud sitting on a hill. You couldn’t see what was in the cloud but Jesus stepped into it and two men stepped out saying: why are you looking into the cloud? He will return as you saw him go. Then these men stepped back in the cloud and it went away. You will note in the Old Testament the abiding presence of God is with them whether it be embodied or in Celestial realms. You will note that a great cloud travelled with Israel and it says YAHWEH was in the cloud. This was as though a fire by night, and a radiant Shekinah cloud by day. All this was covering, shielding something they couldn’t see.
QUESTION: Matthew 10:16‑17, serpents, men?
ANSWER: Behold I send ye forth as sheep in the midst of wolves; be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves. But beware of men; for they will deliver ye up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues. These are serpent men, beware of the Jews they have the synagogues. Jesus is making this clear to His disciples. When He said: I send you forth as sheep among wolves, He is already telling you what kind of men to look out for. Sheep is the symbol of Israel, and the sheep of His pasture, His Household and race.
So He says: I send you forth as sheep among wolves, these workers for Lucifer, Lucifer’s helpers. And then He goes on: Be ye just as wise as the serpents and as harmless as doves. In other words be diplomatic, be careful, but beware of these men who move up to you and say, come into our council. Don’t let them persuade us, don’t be taken in by them, because if you do they will deliver you up to their synagogues and scourge you. But you will be brought before governors, and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the nations they control, see? So when they deliver you up, don’t worry about what you are to say, for in the same hour this shall be given you as to what you are to say. For it is not ye that speak, but the spirit of your Father which speaks in you.
This was the disciples He was talking to who were farmers, fishermen, doctors, tax collectors, they filled all these walks of life, and although they had challenge in the ministry they had not been endued with the force which would charge them and bring all things to their remembrance. So they were naturally a little bit disturbed as to how it would be if they got into a tight spot, so Jesus told them who to be careful of and if they got in a spot they would be given the things to say. And that Spirit of the Father was in them so they would say the right things. This was so they wouldn’t be apprehensive as to what would happen, in such a spot.
QUESTION: There is promises and statements that were made concerning Jerusalem which are true. There are some being made that all this is given to the Jews and that this going back to Jerusalem, of the Jews, is the fulfilment of prophecy, is this true? It is reported that it is a garden place now as the Jews are rebuilding, the question is, could it be that they are Judah, as many think? If they are not then why would God give all these things to the Jews? I have read a number of places that they are Judah???
ANSWER: No place in Scripture does it say that the Jews are Judah. They are Canaanites, Amalakites, Hittites and so forth. Jesus has already told you that are the offspring of Satan, children of the devil. They are the Abomination of the Desolator that was to stand in the last days in this place. To be sure the Jews are trying to develop Palestine and they are spending other peoples money. A large part of the money going to Israeli comes from the United States of America. A large part of it comes from Christians who have been conned out of it. As far as anyone who has been under my ministry and still thinks that the Jews are Judah, they just haven’t listened to well. Because I can tell you that no Jew on the face of the earth can measure up to Judah. There is no place for a Jew to be any part nor lot in this.
The thing I would point out concerning this is that the rains have not yet returned. This is all pieces of figments of imagination spread out over the world to fool Christians, to try to prove to the world that ‘Israel’ has returned, so that they can con the world out of their money to support them, this is what they are up to.
QUESTION: What are the seven spirits (Revelation 3:1)
ANSWER: This is not seven spirits, this is the seven fold spirit of God, this is a facet of 7, and seven is a divine number. So anything of Divine origin is set up in cycles, sometimes as, the seven churches and so forth. So this is a seven fold spirit, a Divine number not seven separate spirits, not at all. Now, there are guardian Angels over the church ages, but this is now what is referred to here.
QUESTION: Last week you mentioned the language of the Pyramid, I wondered if you would explain this?
ANSWER: The language of the Pyramid or the Language of the Pyramid builders, I can’t hear you, But the language of the Pyramid builders was Coptic‑Aramaic, this was a basic language which started out with the Adamic race, but the Pyramid language is measures and alignments. It is definitely an instrument for measuring time, and for carrying forward patterns and symbols. Therefore it has its own language, but in mathematics and measures and timing. If we referred to the language of the Pyramid this is what we referred to. It is a numerical, prophetic, symbolic language. It is only given for some to understand.
QUESTION: People say that Isaiah prophesied after the fall of Babylon and therefore he must have prophesied for our day and not for the fall of Babylon.
ANSWER: But Babylon did not fall until 586 B.C. and Isaiah was dead then. Isaiah was prophesying 200 years before Babylon fell.
QUESTION: Why did the Mayans welcome the Manasseh people?
ANSWER: They were received by the Central American Indians because they thought this was the return of the Children of the Sun, who had come to their chronology in the great time clock of the Mayas, 800 B.C. which was the time when some of the house of Manasseh were supposed to have crossed the sea in the ships. But this was only a part of Manasseh, as this Bible tells us that Manasseh would cross the sea in ships. But the bulk of the Manasseh people moved out with the bulk of Ephraim and Manasseh as they migrated in their period of time, thus this does all tie in. But most of the tradition of South America leans toward the west instead of the east, to the west out of Lemuria. And the artefacts, and the images, and the religious symbolism of South America which are Pre‑Adamic, and which come out of the oldest stratums comes out of the oldest Temples, and it is the same as that coming out of Easter Island, the Steppes of China, and also from Samoa. So this land was one time tied together in one orbit. Some of the finest work on these studies are by Kabar and Dubbs. In fact he is one of the experts on the Pacific Islands, and their civilization and antiquity. This proves that the Bible talks about things which man didn’t find out about until just lately.
And it speaks about these things with accuracy, and the explanation of these things is proven. The Bible says; let every man be found to be a liar (or Mistaken) and God be true. This is what happens, they think they have an exact and absolute science, and then they find out that the record was here in the Bible all the time. If they could have only understood it. However your race carries this capacity to be led to this discovery when all things are understood, when you reach the peak of ‘All Truth’.
QUESTION: Up to the time of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob there must have been a lot of Sethites and Noahites, but all we hear about are the 12 tribes of Israel, but there must have been a lot of people out there somewhere?
QUESTION: The Aquarian Bible what is it?
ANSWER: A man wrote a book, a fanciful Gospel taking material from several sources, from occult teachings, and philosophies as well as some abstractions from Apocrypha books, and some areas are out of the New Testament books.
However there was at one time an Aquarian Bible, but this book had several books in it, and it was called ‘The Aquarius’, but the Aquarian Gospel had a blue cover when it came out. There was one run on it, and one reprint and it never existed before the imagination of this man. This writer of this book was in this special period following in the late 1920’s in Los Angeles when anyone could publish a book, and come out with a new religion, a new gospel. There were all kinds of cults and groups ready to devour it. The Jews found it quite profitable to publish books like this.
I have a copy of that book among these supposed Gospels and sacred writings but I have classified it over with Madam Blavatsky where it properly belongs. Oh, we went to the bottom of this, we talked to one of the publishers who only received it as one of the materials that might be sold at that time to a hot Bible and Gospel reading public. There was a great wave of occult literature that was being passed off as being Biblical and this book you speak of came in that way. There are some interesting things in it, but I wouldn’t give any weight to it. Here is one thing that was in it, men are just a moat floating around in the air for just one short lifetime, and then lost. But they are a part of an eternal whole and therefore since they came out of something eternal, and they reach out to something Eternal then when wrongs have all been straightened out and become right, then man shall arise and be one with God.
QUESTION: II Kings 4:38,39; I wondered about this, but I did not bring my Bible and I don’t know just how it reads?
ANSWER: “And Elijah came again to Gilgal; and there was a drought in the land, and the sons of the prophets were sitting before him; and he said unto his servant, set on the great pot, and see to the potage for the sons of the prophets. One went out into the filed to gather herbs and found a wild vine, and gathered there of wild gourds, his lap full and came and shred them into the pot of potage, for they knew them not. So they poured out for the men to eat, and it came to pass, as they were eating that they cried out and said, o thou man of God there is death in the pot, and they could not eat there of. But he said: bring meal and he cast it into the pot; and he said; pour out for the people every man eat, and there was no harm then in the pot.”
Now, in one of the earlier texts it was that there were deadly toadstools instead of mushrooms in the pot. And it said as they put a spoon in the pot it tarnished so they knew they had death in the pot. Some of the men had eaten of it so he cast meal in the pot and they were healed. It is just as simple as that. It did take a miracle, but the prophet prayed and they put whatever it took to counteract, and some places it says meal, some places ground powder, but whatever it was it just neutralized the poison. It doesn’t have any secret meaning, that is just what happened.
QUESTION: But God told him what to do?
ANSWER: Yes, God gave him the knowledge of what to do. Elijah was the type of prophet who could understand these things, could talk in those terms, that is rather interesting as there are many things talked about in the old records.
QUESTION: This was in the Catholic Bulletin.
ANSWER: Yes, who is my neighbour, Jesus replied. A certain man was on his way from Jacksonville to Atlanta. He fell among white supremacists and they stripped him and beat him and went off and left him half dead. Now, a priest going that way saw the man. And he went to the other side of the road. A Catholic layman also happened to be going that way and seeing him, he went on by. But a Communist seeing him, went up to him and dressed his wounds with sulpha and bound them up. He put him in his own Falcon and brought him to his own hotel and took care of him. The next day he took ten dollars and gave it to the hotel keeper and said: ‘take care of him and whatever you spend, I will pay you when I come back.’ Which of these three do you think proved to be a neighbour to this man when he fell into enemy hands?
This is from a Catholic church bulletin. What a piece of Communist propaganda.
QUESTION: Was this sort of like a Sunday School lesson?
ANSWER: No, this was their Sunday bulletin, their church Bulletin like many churches put out, this bulletin every week.
QUESTION: I wonder if you would elaborate on the Biblical History of this which we were discussing before you came in, relative to the rain fall patterns, the severe droughts in some places where as we are getting this unusual rainfall pattern in this valley?
ANSWER: We spoke some months ago maybe a year ago, upon the weather pattern. Of course there has been promised lots of things such as droughts which are judgments. We can prove this, “The LORD can balance the rainfall of the heavens.” The scriptures declares that this is one of His prerogatives. He balances the rainfall, He has many times warned Israel that under certain areas of disobedience He will turn the rainfall of the heavens from above, and when the earth dries up it will become parched. There is no doubt of this, the areas in which this is most important is when they get careless in their recognition that HE alone is God. When they become careless in associating themselves with strangers. When they move into unbridled immorality. Through the course of their actions they violate His laws in the areas of usury, and He says: He would turn the sun and their sky to brass. Also you will note that in the book of Revelation, one end time measure was that on parts of the earth the sun would be so hot they would curse God, but they could not find death. In other words the actual interpretation is, that one of the chastisement is that it would not kill men, but so inconvenience men that they would be suffering as the heat of the sun would so scorch the earth and there would be a lack of water and so forth.
QUESTION: Who decided that fish isn’t meat, is it because the Catholic’s can’t eat meat on Friday’s?
ANSWER: Well, whether fish is meant is a difference of opinion, but there are lots of differences between cold blooded fish and warm blooded animals called meat, so the Catholic’s have an are of authority for this. But this was a Papal ruling established under Papal authority, and they did this because they decided that Christ died on Friday, so they would abstain from eating meat. I know of no area of scripture to substantiate this, but it doesn’t matter whether a man eats meat or not, or even whether a man keeps Saturday or Sunday, or Monday or Tuesday, just so he keeps it under Yahweh-Yahshua.
It is not important which day he keeps, just so Christian’s come together on the first day of the week, but some even think they meet on Saturday. And the Seventh Day Adventist think that they have to meet on Saturday, but that is just a fetish with them. They have lots of good teaching, but the scripture says: ‘Let a man observe the day according to his own faith, and according to how he feels, just so he has the right God.’ (Romans 14:5-6) This is referring to meat which had been offered to idols. We will thus share days and meat, but as far as the eating of certain meat that the Bible has instructed people not to eat, it was because it was not healthy, or because it wasn’t digestible, but this isn’t a criteria on whether a man has spiritual capacities or whether he is an heir to Eternal Life, for after all, the Adamic Household.
All Israel, the whole race has been destined by the very purposes of God to ultimate perfection, transformed into His own image in His own time, so therefore no eating of meat is going to effect the physical condition in which he dwells in earth at this time. In other words, there are some things that are not good for food. However, let no man judge you by what day you keep, or what meat you eat, as far as putting a real issue on it. That is why we are not Catholic, for a lot of the things that the Catholic teach, we don’t believe.
QUESTION: (From South Africa) We always read and understand that the flood was world wide. They always quote Genesis 7:21-23 and Chapter 10:32 where it talks about the earth being divided after the flood according to their nations. These are the families after their generations, sons of Noah, in their nations. And by these were the nations of the earth divided.
ANSWER: The concept that the flood covered the whole earth is an ecclesiastic concept. But basically the ‘flood’ of Noah’s time did not comer the whole earth. The word in Hebrew for earth is Eretz which means that place or all that country. So this was the area of the country where Noah and his family were ordered to build the Ark. Of course they were the last and purest strain of the Adamic Race left in that area, at that time, in the Upper Tarim Basin which was north of Turkestan at that time. (In the high Himalaya Mountains). This area of that country shows the effects of that flood to this day. It is a great upper valley several hundred miles long, but there was also an underground sea under that area. The great pillar of rock which held up the surface was broken by a great earthquake and the land fell into the water. But you can see some of these pillars of rock still standing today, and see how they collapsed. At the same time water fell from above, and all in all, this basin filled up and the foundations of the deep were thus uncovered at the same time and the Ark floated. But this is the place where the flood of Noah’s time occurred, and the water rose up to the high mountains of that area. Ararat means high mountain. Thus the mountain of this basin had water up to the rim of the basin. And then another great earthquake came at both ends of the basin and cracked it open and the water ran out. One end of the water ran down into China, because this was the dividing line of the drainage of the earth. Water went down through the Wang Ho river of China. And at the other end it went to the west. Then finally down through the area where lay the City of Ur of the Chaldea. And then emptied into the sea. When the earthquake came, one can see where the water poured out through this rift, and out of this great fault and then descended into these two areas.
QUESTION: What about the blackouts that just hit the East Coast and parts of Canada?
ANSWER: Well, this was one of the most unique power failures of all history. We do not believe that this was an ordinary power failure. The reason for this is that within five minutes of this, the Negroes in Rochester, New York had blocked the streets with automobiles and were already looting. And in the dark the officers were having a hard time trying to break it up. Well, it took several hours. And took a while to get through the barricade of cars that had been set in place. Within ten minutes of the blackout, organised bands of Negroes were creating fires and causing fires in Harlem. Then in Boston, almost simultaneous with the blackout, the looting started. So in other words, if this had just been an ordinary blackout, the looting could not have started so quickly. Of course, it was a test rehearsal by the Communist Left Wing forces to see what these overloads of power would do.
Back in 1953 the Communist party was holding a meeting in LA at which time they talked about the massive plan to cut off all power to the major cities at a zero hour. Then dress rehearsals were planned to show how they could paralyse the whole community, the whole city. At that time they had designated certain people in certain communities to help carry this out. One of the areas called for the blowing up of the main trunk line at Boulder Dam and also certain areas of transformers and areas of dispersion. At the present time it is not so easy to do this in California, as it is in other parts of the nation because of Edison and Company who in so many steam generators, to take over just in case. Whereas they might black out a portion of the city, they can’t black out the whole west coast because of these many areas of diversified electricity.
QUESTION: (tape audience) asking for an explanation of the 82nd Psalm. For there seems to be some confusion in it.
ANSWER: Not really. The 82nd Psalm is probably the most important passage in the scripture as it relates to the identity of the Divine Household in the earth. It deals with a conversation which God gives through David to the Elect.
“God standeth in the congregation of the mighty, he judgeth among the Gods”, then “Hear O Israel the LORD thy God is ONE LORD” and “Is there any gods beside me, no I know not any.” All of these things God through out the writings of Isaiah and other places is talking about pagan gods, all mythological gods who are no gods. But when God standeth in the congregation of the mighty among the Gods, then the word is Elohim. This then makes sense, because this is a conversation YAHWEH the eternal God had with the Elohim. Here is the Eternal father speaking to his offspring, then they are thus Elohim, or Gods. Therefore they have a divine quality, so YAHWEH speaks in the congregation of the Mighty and judgeth among the Elohim, and He said: -“How long will you judge unjustly and accept the person of the wicked?” The Elohim are those of the Adamic race who came to earth, and then fell in the Luciferian fall, as this race bowed to temptation and cunning. But they did not lose their Sonship by this process, they are still the issue of the MOST HIGH GOD. They are still the children whom He has begotten. Come over to the book of Isaiah where God talks about how he created the Universe, and all therein, and then makes this statement concerning His sons; “Thus saith YAHWEH the holy one of Israel, the master of Israel, “Ask me concerning my sons”. In this declaration he makes this statement about His sons, and then in the 82nd., Psalm he says: “How long will you accept the persons of the wicked? And he tells them that since they are sons, then act like sons and defend the poor, and the needy, the fatherless; do justice to the afflicted, and rid them of the hands of the wicked.
QUESTION: In the past few weeks there has been some changes in the teaching of the Catholic theology. After 940 years, it is now alright for Catholics to eat meat on Friday, except for Good Friday. The question is from Catholic ministers who find themselves at a loss. They find that after many years of instructions that this was a sin, more than this many have done penitence for breaking this law under the areas of business engagements and other patterns. So is it or is it not a biblical conjuncture that they could or could not eat meat on Friday? Or did the church bring this law entirely on church authority? And if so, why did they relinquish it after 940 years of the historic practice of this?
ANSWER: Well, the only answer is that it had no biblical foundation what so ever. It had no Biblical instruction, was never commanded of God, had no spiritual value what so ever. It had been built to its significance by the Church, and its Priesthood to keep areas of symbolism attached to their religion. It was designed as St. Thomas Aquinis was so careful in explaining, that since Christ was crucified on Friday, this involved the shedding of blood, so no meat would be eaten on Friday. This being a decision of the church because the eating of meat required the shedding of blood. Since Christ was crucified then no animal whose blood was shed would be devoured on Friday. That this had a certain spiritual value and the church through great revelation had come to this area of instruction. This isn’t something which is 1900 years old, it is less than 1000 years since the edict has been made, and Penitence and church judgments were placed on the violations of this declaration.
QUESTION: What about the suggestion that Cain and Abel were twins? About Cain’s history being established? Let us know what History has to say about this. We are interested also in knowing about life in the kingdom among Christians.??
ANSWERS: Concerning the parentage of Cain, Cain was the son of Lucifer and Eve, (I John 3:11-12) “This is the message that ye have heard from the beginning, that ye should love one another. Not as Cain who is the progeny of the Wicked One, and slew his brother.”
Now, here you are told that Cain was the son of the Evil One, thus this statement that Cain and Abel were twins is a fallacy. We never made the statement that Cain and Abel are twins. Even the biblical record in Genesis 4 is not properly translated for it says: ‘And Adam knew his wife Eve, and she conceived and bare Cain and then said: I have gotten a man from the Lord. And she again bare his brother Abel and Abel was a keeper of the sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.’