Download Category: Who's Who

MANY HAVE HEARD, AND ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH, THE TERMS “IRISH” AND “SCOTTISH”, and really don’t know the difference between the two. The Irish and Scots are really the same people except they arrived in Britain two thousand years apart. The ancestors of the Irish arrived in Britain about 1600 B.C., while the Scots arrived about 501 A.D. It is simply amazing that two groups of the same people would wander through the earth and end up locating within a few miles from each other two thousand years later in Britain. Because there are two different groups of the same peoples concerned here, we will have to treat them separately even though they came from the same family. We will first investigate the background of the Irish.

The Irish are a very ancient people, and their history covers a large span of time. If we will take the time to do a little arithmetic, we will soon see we are talking about approximately 3,500 years or better. With the United States being 223 years old (1999), you can see the Irish history is about 18 times as old as we are. When one considers all the things that have happened since 1776, it is staggering to imagine what has happened to the Irish people over a period of 3,500 years.

WHERE DID THE WELSH CYMRY COME FROM? Just as HOSEA married a wife named “GOMER” (Hos.1:3), so also it was during the reign of King HOSHEA that Israel first went into captivity as GHOMRI. Micah 6:15 condemns the northern Israelites for keeping the “statutes of OMRI.” OMRI in Hebrew begins with the consonant “Agin,” formerly called “Gayin” which was pronounced with a gutteral “H,” that is “Gh” or “Kh.” The Israelites would have pronounced OMRI as “GHOMRI” which became “KHUMRI” in Assyrian. “GIMIRI” was the Babylonian way of pronouncing CIMMERIANS or Scythians (Tomb of Darius; Behistun Rock in Persia).

OMRI was evidently a strong king. The Assyrians called Israel after his name, BIT OMRI (Khumri)” (1968 edition, p.44 Langer’s Encyc. of World History; Moabite Stone). He built Samaria the capital of the Ten Tribes (1 Ki. 16:25). Some scholars have suggested that KIMMERIM refers to “idolatrous” (KEMARIM) Israelites. On Shalmaneser’s Black Obelisk, Jehu , king of Israel, is called “son of OMRI” (880 B.C.)

IN THE PRESENT DAY, ALTHOUGH ENGLAND, SCOTLAND, WALES AND IRELAND STILL MAINTAIN devotion each to its own Patron Saint, St. George has come to represent in a general way Britain—the British Isles.

As a result of research by hagiographers and his­torians, no competent authority now doubts the fact of the historic George of Lydda. The accounts of miracle-working incidents and fabulous tales tena­ciously held by the popular mind in medieval times are, in our day, so manifestly unreal that modern sceptics, having missed established facts, scarcely escape the temptation to relegate all that pertains to St. George, both truth and fiction, to the realm of the mythical.

While rejecting the legendary accretions which have accumulated in great profusion around the simple story of his life, an effort has been made in the following pages to bring together the historical notices of St. George to be found in British annals and else­where.

It should be made clear to the reader that there was another George with whom our Patron Saint is often confused. C. J. Marcus says: “Gibbon iden­tifies St. George with the disreputable George of Cappadocia—a case of mistaken identity which has persisted ever since.” Mommsen also: “The historian Edward Gibbon did the character of the saint much harm. Gibbon confounded two wholly distinct men, George who was born in Epiphania in Cilicia, and George of Lydda”; and Hepworth Dixon on the same theme: “We have had two St. Georges in history and to our shame we have made them one, and we have been indolently content to let our greatest historical writer, Gibbon, describe him as one of the vilest scamps and darkest villains who ever stained this earth with crime.”

Date:   May 27, 2013 
An Expose’ Documenting the Cabal of Phony White Patriots and False Teachers Claiming To Be Christian Identity While Aiding and Abetting ZOG Via the Tactic of Divide and Conquer

“The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity, nor speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth.” – Zeph. 3:13.

“They hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of Yahweh: they would none of my counsel.  They despised my reproof.  Therefore they shall eat of the fruit of their own way and be filled with their own devices.”  – Prov. 1:29-31.
Woe to them that devise iniquity, and work evil upon their beds!  When the morning is light, they practice it, because it is in the power of their hand.  And they covet fields, and take them by violence; and houses, and take them away: so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage. – Micah 2:1-2.

“If the Jew is present, your dreams will never come true.” – Eustace Mullins

Introduction: Crisis in Identity
“Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever commiteth sin is the servant of sin.”- John 8:34.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through–-all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.   For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” – Marcus Tullius Cicero
This essay has been composed as a public service to Christian Israel, because Scripture tells us to expose criminals who operate in our midst.  (2 Tim. 3:1-5.)  A crisis has emerged within our ranks, which has been brought about primarily by Mr. William Finck, who, as a supposed member of our Faith, has used every form of deceit and guile to defame those with whom he disagrees.  Rather than confine himself to rational debate, Mr. Finck has, for quite some time, descended to the level of ad hominem attack, rumour-mongering and back-stabbing.

.

THE QUESTION IS, WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF FRANCE IN Bible prophecy? In the main France is descended from the Israelite tribe of Reuben. In France there are also minorities from the tribes of Simeon and Gad. This is well documented in the book “The Tribes” by Yair Davidy”.

To have an understanding of France prophetically it is necessary to understand Reuben. Reuben was the firstborn son of Jacob through Leah. Jacob had two wives Leah and Rachel. But Jacob loved Rachel more than Leah. “And when the LORD saw that Leah was hated, he opened her womb: but Rachel was barren. And Leah conceived, and bare a son, and she called his name Reuben: for she said, Surely the LORD hath looked upon my affliction; now therefore my husband will love me” (Genesis 29:31, 32). Reuben means ‘see a son’. It was in the environment when Leah felt unloved by her husband and as a consequence was afflicted that Reuben was born.

Reuben was born in the environment of Leah’s emotional turmoil. As a consequence Reuben became an unstable person. According to Genesis 49:4 Reuben is „unstable as water’. After Rachel Jacob’s second wife was buried “Israel (Jacob) journeyed, and spread his tent beyond the tower of Edar. And it came to pass, when Israel dwelt in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father’s concubine: and Israel heard it” (Gen 35:21, 22). This was an abomination before the LORD. This failure by Reuben as the eldest son to properly look after and protect all the remaining members of Jacob’s family while he was away but instead fornicated with his father’s concubine was to later disqualify him from the birthright.

THERE IS NO DIRECT HISTORY connecting the tribe of Reuben to the French people. We are talking about one of the lost tribes. Even the French Caucasian population comes from various backgrounds. One can compare this with Israelites. These people have known many proselytes, yet, there has been a core of the tribe of Judah (and some of Levi & Benjamin) over the past 2500 years. The core passes on characteristics and genes to the periphery. Looking at the ‘prophetic clues’, one has to conclude that a core of the tribe of Reuben once found its way to the two northern thirds of (Celtic) France. This core passed on its characteristics and genes to the influx of others. Just to make it easy we will talk about the French, although the southern third of France (le Midi) most likely does not belong to the lost tribes. The more fulfilled prophetic clues we find, the stronger our case. What follows is not historic proof, but proof by revelation.

And when the LORD SAW (va-yar – וירא), that Leah was hated, he opened her womb: but Rachel was barren. And Leah conceived, and bare A SON (ben – בן and she called his name REUBEN ) r’eu-ven – see, (a) son – ראובן (for she said, Surely the LORD hath LOOKED ) ra’a – ראה ( upon my affliction; now therefore MY HUSBAND (my man, ishi – אישי (will love me (Gen 29:31-32, KJV throughout, unless mentioned otherwise).

THE ORIGINS OF THE HISTORIES OF THE FRENCH-SPEAKING COUNTRIES, as those of all the nations of the world, represent an insoluble mystery for historians and ethnologists. They recognize frankly that the annals of ancient history are very obscure. “History doesn’t know the origin of any people” remarked Lenormant (“An­cient History of the Orient”, p. 234) adding that the further one attempts to delve into the past, the more obscure it becomes.

What then is the REASON? Better than anyone, Paul, “the apostle to the Gentiles”, can give us the answer in his epistle to the Romans, written under divine inspiration:

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all un-righteousness and ungodliness of men, who hold the truth CAPTIVE, because that which may be-known of God is manifest to them; for God has showed it to them… they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.” (Rom. 1:18-21)

Unlike the theorems of geometry and mathematics, history, to such an extent as mankind has exposed it, has given us no reliable summary which will not be corrupted. Its knowledge is not only scanty, but also hypothetical. In the “Preface” of his work en­titled “Encyclopaedia of World History”, Mr. Langer recognizes this gap and confirms the fact that a number of historical facts are themselves contested, and so little corroborated, that they could never establish the basis of any definite testimony.

History, therefore, has no POINT OF DEPARTURE. It ignores that there is a source, or rather it rejects it firmly, as we are going to see. Consequently, having no one dtfinite source from which it can draw its pieces of information with the desired assurance, the historian tends to speak of the “possible” and of the “probable”. But this possible and this probable, by the ad­mission of Jubainville “holds a LARGER AND LARGER PLACE which is increased proportionally as the number of centuries which sep­arate us: from the events.(“The First Inhabitants of Europe”, p. VIII)

We live in an age in which man has no fear of considering “obsolete” every work or treatise, or any knowledge that is not the product of the present generation–including the BIBLE! Thus, history is doubly vulnerable, for not only does it miss necessary clues, but as well, since it refuses to consider the biblical date of the creation of man, its chronology becomes almost en­tirely a myth!

History, as historians tell it, depends exclusively on scientific knowledge acquired by men through the ages. To cite an example, bibliography, palaeography, archaeology, chronology, palaeontology, etc. are some sciences related to History; because their principles change with the course of civilization, History, in turn, remains SUBJECT TO REVISION, if not always unexpected, at least sometimes radical.

.

WHEN JACOB (ISRAEL) GAVE HIS DYING BLESSING TO HIS TWELVE SONS, he associated each of them with some animal, object or personal characteristic which afterwards became the emblem of the tribe descended from him. Among these the LION, the emblem of Jacob’s fourth son Judah, is of special importance. This lion, in a couchant (lying down) position, became the emblem of the tribe of Judah; then, in a passant position, it became the emblem of the Camp or Brigade of Judah. Later, with the addition of a crown, it became the emblem of the Royal House and the throne of Judah. Still later, in a rampant (standing on the hind legs with both forelegs elevated) posture and with a crown, it became the symbol of the two-tribed House and Kingdom of Judah.

Yet this lion, usually portrayed as tawny or golden in colour, is not the only emblem of the descendants of Judah — or even the only lion!

In the last four verses of Genesis 38, we find recorded the birth of twin sons to Jacob’s fourth son Judah. Notice what these verses say:

Now it came to pass, at the time for giving birth, that behold, twins were in her womb. And so it was, when she was giving birth, that the one put out his hand; and the midwife took a scarlet thread and bound it on his hand, saying, “This one came out first.” Then it happened, as he drew back his hand that his brother came out unexpectedly; and she said, “How did you break through? This breach be upon you!” Therefore his name was called Perez. Afterwards his brother came out who had the scarlet thread on his hand. And his name was called Zerah [Zarah].

THE BALTIC REPUBLICS OF FINLAND AND ESTONIA are among the most northerly inhabited countries in the world. They share much with their Nordic neighbours: Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Like other Nordics, Finns and Estonians are egalitarian and democratic. They are also winners in the new global economy. Finland in the early 2000’s was rated the most competitive economy on earth. Estonia, having endured a half-century of Communism has now become the free-market showplace of the Soviet Union.

Finland and Estonia are curiosities. Ethnically, many Finns and Estonians resemble Swedes and Danes, but most of them do not speak a Germanic or Indo-European language. Finnish and Estonian belong to the Finno-Ugric or Ural-Altaic language family, related distantly to Turkish and Hungarian. In spite of their Nordic democratic traditions and high levels of wealth and literacy both countries have endured long centuries of servitude imposed upon them by the realities of geography and history.

There is a clue to the paradox of Finnish/Estonian history. During World War II General Mannerheim led the Finnish army in two separate conflicts against the Soviet Union. Astonishingly, he addressed them as ‘Men of Issachar’!

Could there be a connection between the people of Finland and their Estonian cousins and a tiny, supposedly extinct, tribe of ancient Israel.

Israel’s Battleground

Issachar was the youngest son of Jacob’s wife Leah, born not long after his brother Zebulun. Leah named him Yissakar, which meant ‘he will bring  a reward’, which derived from sachar, which meant ‘payment’. Leah named her last son this because she had to hire Jacob to sleep with her!