The Jewish War of Survival

The Jewish War of Survival


I STOOD, AS MR. RICHARD STOKES, M. P., STOOD, FOR A NEGOTIATED PEACE, but, possibly, on vastly different grounds. Mr. Stokes was not interned, because he will not face the Jewish Menace. Since the beginning of the War, I did what little I could in favour of a negotiated peace, no matter which side was for the moment on top. I believe that the War was, from the National standpoint, a disaster — wrong and unnecessary.

For holding similar views on other wars contemporary to them, such well-known men as: Pitt, Fox, Bright, Lloyd George, Ramsay MacDonald and the present Home Secretary Herbert Morrison were not interned. There is of course a difference in my case, as I am attacking the Jews and they were not, and the Jew holds supreme power.

I have attacked the Jews before and won a great moral victory over them. The Jews had me imprisoned for six months in 1936 for what was said to be a “public mischief” in that I mentioned in my paper, “The Fascist,” the subject of Jewish Ritual Murder. Evidently judging me by their own standards, they thought to frighten me into silence. When I came out of prison I published a book on the subject, and they honoured me by maintaining a silence so intense that it could almost be heard! They were afraid to advertise it by taking another action against me. I defied them successfully and the book has since been distributed all over the world. I hope therefore to do it successfully again.

This War was Jewish and has never had any other object than the salvation of the Jews from Hitler. The first nine chapters of this book disprove the “causes” given from time to time by politicians and others for our being in a War which even the ignorant mob had sensed and labelled “phoney.”

The Tenth Chapter deals with a half-truth prevalent amongst the better-informed. The rest of the book completes my case that the War was Jewish and that Britain was forced into it for Jewish purposes. The world has only seen one more stupendous bluff than this war, and that was Jewish too.
Guildford, Surrey ARNOLD LEESE – 5th May 1945

Chinese Communism

Chinese Communism

THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE BY ARNOLD LEESE IS REPRINTED FROM GOTHIC RIPPLES, NO. 49, DATED 28TH FEBRUARY, 1949. It shows that the seeds of Bolshevism were planted in China by Jews, who also tended and trained the growth that resulted. The corruption of the regime of Chiang Kai-Shek caused many of the masses in China to turn to Communism for relief, since Chinese Communism is mixed with Nationalism and discourages the old Chinese curse of official corruption; but Communism in China has the same dehumanising effect on the people as it has elsewhere.

The Jewish Rotting of China

It was the Sassoon family which turned the normal Chinese dislike and distrust of foreigners into hatred. David Sassoon made the Opium Trade in China from 1832 until he died in 1864. His family carried on the Trade under our Flag and made huge fortunes. The British took the blame, and
now the Chinese loathe us; just as we took the blame for the Jewish atrocities at Nuremberg, Spandau and elsewhere in Germany, so that the Germans now hate us.

Backed by the Sassoons, the Shanghai Opium Monopoly existed until 1917 under the Jew Edward Ezra, its Managing Committee being composed entirely of Jews and Indians. Not only did the British Flag protect the Sassoons in this abominable trade which the Manchus did all they could to prevent, even to the extent of war, but also these Jews were welcomed in England instead of being ostracised. Royalty petted them and they intermarried with Aryan aristocrats. Some became Baronets and one a Minister of the Government.

The Jewish Method of Cattle Slaughter

The Jewish Method of Cattle Slaughter

The Present State Of British Law With Reference To Animal Slaughter For Food

THE Slaughter of Animals Act, 1933, provides that all animals slaughtered for the food of man shall die by stunning with a mechanic­ally-operated instrument; but with three important exceptions viz.: —

(I) Pigs, when no electric power is available, whereby these animals are stunned, without detriment to the carcass, by means of an electric shock.

(2) Sheep, unless the Local Author­ity protects them by provid­ing in its Bye-laws that they must be stunned.

(3) All animals killed for the food of Jews or Mahomedans.

There is no real excuse for any of these prohibitions.

The many societies that exist for the protection of animals from cruelty have had a very long and hard fight to arrive even at the unsatisfactory stage in which the 1933 Act leaves us; they have had tremendous oppo­sition from the trade, and the British people have no reason to be proud of their indifference and inaction in face of the fact that sheep, in par­ticular, have been, and often still are, subject to a shockingly dirty death at the hands of the butcher. Never­theless, the slaughter of cattle has at last been made humane where Gentile food is concerned.

Why, in a country calling itself Christian, and with a population Aryan or of Aryan strain, should Jews and Mahomedans be allowed to kill their cattle by methods less humane than those we ourselves have adopted?

It is of course necessary that all animals killed for human food should be thoroughly well bled, and this is done by cutting the throat, so that the heart itself pumps the blood from the animal before it stops beating.

The Illuminati and The French Revolution

The Illuminati and The French Revolution

ON OCTOBER 6, 1789, there was seized at the home of Mirabeau’s publisher, a number of important documents. One of them, called Croquis ou Projet de Monsieur de Mirabeau, was a statement of the aims and purposes of the Illuminate, supposedly written by Mirabeau; Illuminist, Cabalist and the darling of the Jewish society of Paris (having reported on his trip to Germany–where he received his initiation into Weishaupt’s Illuminate–to his Jewish supporters at the home of Henrietta Herz).

To please his Jewish friends and supporters of the French Revolution, Mirabeau wrote his great apology for the Jews under the form of a panegyric of Mendelssohn, the father of Jewish Illuminism. Suitable praise of Mirabeau’s love of Jewry and his services to the eternal internationalists, can be found in M. Samuel’s “Memoirs of Moses Mendelssohn,” 1827. In this document concerning “Mirabeau’s Project,” after a diatribe against the French Monarchy, the document goes on to say that “in order to triumph over this hydra-headed monster these are my ideas:

“We must overthrow all order, suppress all laws, annul all power, and leave the people in anarchy. The laws we establish will not perhaps be in force at once, but at any rate, having given back the power to the people, they will resist for the sake of their liberty which they will believe they are preserving.

We must caress their vanity, flatter their hopes, promise them happiness after our work has been in operation; we must elude their caprices and their systems at will, for the people as legislators are very dangerous, they only establish laws which coincide with their passions, their want of knowledge would besides only give birth to abuses.

But as the people are a lever which legislators can move at their will, we must necessarily use them as a support, and render hateful to them everything we wish to destroy and sow illusions in their path; we must also buy all the mercenary pens which propagate our methods and which will instruct the people concerning their enemies whom we attacked.

The Growing Menace of Freemasonry

The Growing Menace of Freemasonry

DISRAELI, SPEAKING AT AYLESBURY, 20TH SEPTEMBER, 1873, SAID:—”I can assure you, Gentlemen, that those who govern must count with new elements! We have to deal not with Emperors and Cabinets only. We must take into consideration secret societies, who can disconcert all measures at the last moment, who have agents everywhere, determined men, encouraging assassinations, and capable of bringing about a massacre at any moment.”

The Conspiracy of Silence.

“THE position claimed by Freemasonry throughout the Whole World is a peculiarly and radically exceptional one. It alone is never, except in rare instances, dis­cussed by the Press; indeed, it refused to allow itself to be discussed.”

“Although priests openly deliberate and pronounce upon all other points affecting the general interests of mankind; although Christianity with its system and doctrines, the State with its laws and constitution, are topics of free discussion; although the most intimate and personal concerns of individual persons are made public—Freemasonry alone, by the universal consent of Europe, is acknowledged to be a Noli me tangere! Everyone shrinks from speaking of it, as of an uncanny ghost. This phenomenon is an obvious proof of the immense power Freemasonry exercises in the world . . . . ”

This was said over 60 years ago by the Bishop of Mayence and it is still true to‑day. The time has arrived when this Con­spiracy of Silence must be dissolved. Freemasonry and the Jew Power (which is also surrounded by a vast conspiracy of silence) have for centuries been undermining Christian and Aryan civilisation.

The British Lion Vol. 1 No. 25 1928

The British Lion Vol. 1 No. 25 1928

At Buckingham Palace.

The British Lion Vol. 2 No. 1 Saturday, June 13th 1925

The British Lion Vol. 2 No. 1 Saturday, June 13th 1925

TOO many people seem to be under the impression that the signing of an enrolment form and the purchase of a badge, render the new member a Fascist in every sense of the term.

These are but the outward signs of the fact that he or she has recognised the duty of taking part, as an active worker, in the struggle against a foe who prefers intrigue to force, but who will not scruple ruthlessly to use the latter when the years of underground machination have done their work

The British Guardian 9th January,1925

The British Guardian 9th January,1925

No. 1 Vol VI. 9th SEPTEMBER, 1925
We have much pleasure in announcing that with the present number we
commence the weekly publication of the BRITISH GUARDIAN. The
price has been fixed at two-pence to meet the wishes of the class of people
whom we have found from experience to be the most sympathetic and
responsive to our views, and desirous of hearing and knowing the truth.
They are the true national stock of pure British blood—simple, honest,
straightforward people, mostly working for a wage which does not allow
of inconsiderate expenditure, even of pence. It has taken some years for
the truth of our insistent message to dawn on the consciousness of these
people. For five years we have persisted in bringing the facts before
them—in the beginning in spite of their amused contempt and derision,
if not of their actual hostility. But now we commence this, our sixth
volume, conscious that we are receiving at the hands of a great number
of these people of British blood acknowledgement, even some praise, and,
greatest of all, their active support and help.

The British Guardian September 1924

The British Guardian September 1924

No. 9 Vol V. SEPTEMBER, 1924
(Seven Pence Monthly)
The Proteus of Peoples.
The Infamous Russian Treaty.
Rudyard Kipling’s Speech of 1914.
The Conservative Party.
Mrs. Webster’s Book.
The House of Jews.
Our Effort to Beat Mond.
General Prescott-Decie’s Mistake. Loyalty League Workers.
Lord Ernle’s Jewish Mind.
Alien Immigration and National Emigration
Sir Alfred Mond’s Kosher (?) Pigs
How the Jews Can Help Us. A Retort to Dean Inge

Era of World Ruin

Era of World Ruin

THE WORDS, LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY which are sometimes summed up in the word “Liberalism” have a noble sound and appearance. Are they not above criticism? Yes, but only when each one is in its right place: Liberty where Liberty can be exercised with intelligence, Equality where Equality really exists, and so on. And yet, in the domain of politics these words are, as will be shown in the course of this Note, anathema to anyone acquainted with their origin and with the evil purpose to which they have been applied, and with the results of their use.

The main result of their use has been the splitting up of coun­tries into warring political parties. These parties are known collectively as Democracy. When Democracy holds an election, it is supposed to produce—at least we flatter ourselves that it produces—a Parliament which represents the best interests of the State. But as the majority of members are forced by their political Association to put the interests of party before that of the State, Democracy fails at the very outset to achieve its main object. So it just carries on in a disjointed manner, in a state of political warfare with itself.