Download Tag: Scripture

THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL PEOPLE TO QUESTION ME about my use of the word “stake” and not the “Cross” that Christ was crucified on. When all the churches, even the Catholic church uses the cross as the thing that Christ was crucified upon. Well I am not the only one that believes that He was crucified on a stake and not a cross as the following from the Companion Bible relates:–

The Cross and Crucifixion

In the Greek New Testament two words are used for “the cross,” on which the Lord was put to death.

1). The word “stauros”; which denotes an upright pale or stake, to which the criminals were mailed for execution.

2). The word “xulon,” which generally denotes a piece of a dead log of wood, or timber, for fuel or for any other purpose. It is not like “dendron,” which is used of a living, or green tree, as in Matthew 21:8; Revelation 7:1, 3; 8:7; 9:4.

As this latter word “xulon” is used for the former “stauros,” it shows us that the meaning of each is exactly the same.

The verb “stauroö” means to drive stakes. (There are two compounds of it used: sustauroö to put any one thus to death with another (Matthew 27:44; Mark 15:32; John 19:32; Romans 6:6; Galatians 2:20); and anastauroö to raise up and fix upon the stake again (Hebrews 6:6). Another word used is equally significant; prosp gnumi to fix or fasten anything (Acts 2:23)

Benjamin Disraeli, P.M. 1874-1880

BENJAMIN DISRAELI (1804-1880) (nicknamed “Dizzy”) was an English statesman from 1837 to 1880. He was Prime Minister of England in 1868, and again from 1874 to 1880. He was England’s first Jewish Prime Minister. When he was young, his father had a severe argument with his synagogue, and, as a result, baptized his children as Christians. If he hadn’t been baptized, his career would have been very different (Jews were not allowed in Parliament until 1858).

His early life was a series of failures. In 1824 he lost all of his money in South African mining shares, and didn’t get out of debt until middle age. He became a novelist like his father (he wrote many books throughout his life) and then decided in 1831 to enter politics. He lost as an independent radical in both 1832 and 1835, and decided he needed to affiliate himself with a political party.
He finally won a seat in the House of Commons in 1837 as a Conservative. His first speech was so pompous and poorly delivered that he was shouted at and forced to sit down. He uttered this famous quote: “I will sit down now, but the time will come when you will hear me.” He was right; in 1846, when the Liberals repealed the Corn Laws (protective tariffs on foreign grain), he became the leader of the opposition in the House of Commons. Then he became the Chancellor of the Exchequer. He was Prime Minister for a very short time during 1868, then resigned when the Liberals won the elections.

IT IS YET ANOTHER PARADOX IN A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN year that has abounded with them: Texas Governor George W. Bush won less than 20 per cent of the Jewish American vote, and far more Arab‑American votes than his opponent, Vice‑President Al Gore. Yet in the end, Bush may be surrounded by even more pro‑Israel advisers than Gore would have been.

His top two foreign‑policy officials are expected to be African‑Americans General Colin Powell, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as Secretary of State; and Condoleeza Rice, former head of the Soviet desk at the National Security Council, as National Security Adviser. Both have strong Jewish connections.

Powell, the son of Jamaican immigrants, speaks Yiddish, which he learned as a boy. He has won the hearts of American Jewish audiences, including those at the annual policy conferences of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, with a fluency few of them could have matched.

General Powell was an advocate of sending Patriot antiballistic missile batteries to defend Israel from Iraqi Scud attacks during the 1991 Gulf War. He has always shown strong sympathy with the Jewish state.

Ms Rice numbers among her own close advisers Richard Haas, director of foreign policy and security studies at Washington’s prestigious Brookings Institution, and Dov Zakheim, former deputy undersecretary of defence under President Reagan. Both are Jewish. Zakheim, in fact, has semichah [rabbinic ordination].

THE MOTTO OF ISRAEL’S SPY AGENCY, MOSSAD, is, according to recently defected Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky: “By way of deception thou shalt do war.” That motto describes more than the modus operandi of the world’s most ruthless and feared organization of professional assassins and espionage agents; it really describes the modus vivendi of an entire race. It is necessary to understand that fact before one can hope to understand fully the role of the Jews in national and world affairs.

The concept of a race eternally at war with the rest of the world is alien to us. It is difficult to believe or even to grasp. When we examine such a concept and begin sifting the evidence it is easy to become confused.

Similarly bloodthirsty, explicit injunctions are repeated so often in the Jews’ holy books that we can only assume that they are meant to be taken seriously. The historical evidence suggests that in ancient times the Jews did indeed take their religion seriously: they were notorious everywhere and at all times as implacable haters of humanity who in turn were thoroughly despised by every other people among whom they lived.

“A GRIMM AFFAIR” FOCUSES ON THE TALES OF THE BROTHERS GRIMM, stories which have nearly been forgotten due to the plague of television which has stolen our minds, as well as those of our children. Most of us have at least heard of Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm, but very few could specifically name any one of their 200+ tales. Many would be surprised to know that these two not only composed such timeless tales as Rapunzel, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Little Red Riding Hood, Rumplestiltskin, and Snow White, but also “anti-semetic” and folkish like tales. Written in Germany during the early 19th century, these tales far surpass anything put out by Disney; these are the REAL stories, before Michael Eisner slaughtered them and turned them into a multi-ethnic extravaganza.

I KNOW THAT I HAVE SENT THIS OUT TO YOU BEFORE, but I have so many new people on my list that have never seen it I thought I should send it out to them as well.

Did you ever wonder about the trees in the Garden of Eden. They were people not wooden trees. Oh I am sure there were some real trees but most were people, which were created BEFORE Adam.

What Were The Trees In The Garden of Eden?

Our people have been taught for over 100 years that Adam and Eve ate an apple or some sort of fruit from the tree of good and evil which was in the midst of the Garden of Eden. That Adam and Eve were the father and mother of all the various races, yet the Bible proves they are lying through their teeth.

It is very possible that many of them believe that story themselves, because that was what they were taught; however there are a very large number of Judeo-Christian Preachers today who know that is false, but will not teach the truth because they are wolves in sheep’s clothing, teaching that Christ is Christ but are working secretly to destroy the Word of God; to destroy the knowledge of Christ, Christianity from the people and to destroy Christians at some future date, under laws which have been secretly passed which will allow The Execution of Christians in America! Laws such as Public Law 102-14.

“And he looked up, and said, I see men as trees, walking.” (Mark 8:24)

But the truth of the matter is that the trees spoken of in the Garden of Eden were people! not trees such as the Pear, Apple, Orange, Pecan and etc. They were people.

IN THE BIBLE MANY TRUTHS ARE CONCEALED which will not always be hidden from those who will devote time and study to searching the Scriptures. Proverbs 25:2 “It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.” Many consider that they have fulfilled their duty as Christians if they periodically read portions of the Bible, but, contrary to the popular conception, nowhere in the Scriptures themselves are we admonished to read the Bible. Rather the emphasis is on study and research, to be followed by careful analysis and application of its teachings. In his instruction to Timothy Paul said: “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” (2 Timothy 2:15)

Study Essential: Jesus Himself admonished His followers to “search the Scriptures” (John 5:39) and, if we follow His instrucitons, we must do more than just read Biblical passages from time to time. One is often greeted with the inane remark, “I jsut cannot understand the Bible.” This is invariably expressed by one who has never really tried to understand the Scriptures, having only given of his time spasmodically to reading familiar passages taken out of their context, such as “Selected Bible Readings” and the like. Spiritual understanding is the by-product of diligent study under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Unless individuals approach the Bible with a prayerful desire that the Lord will open up to their understanding the knowledge and wisdom hidden within its pages, they will fare only a few degrees better than the atheist and agnostic who only read the Scriptures to criticise and censure.

.

THE RECORD OF BLACKS IN SOUTH AFRICA, who have been ruling that country since their President DeKlerk betrayed his people, has been so appalling that even Mrs. DeKlerk, the wife of the treacherous deputy president, that she has been quoted as saying, “The Blacks are not capable of ruling a country.” Which is demonstrably true, but the reason is not, as the liberals would claim, a lack of education or an unfavourable environment. It is purely and simply a matter of mental inadequacy.

As W.G. Simpson has pointed out in his book, “Which Way, Western Man?” the Negro has never developed a significant culture anywhere, at any time. Tom Anderson sums up Black history: “Despite what you have been told, Negro history has not been obliterated. There wasn’t any. During the past 5,000 years, the history of Black Africa is blank. Not just here. Everywhere. Until other races arrived, there was no literate civilization south of the Sahara. The black African had not invented a plough; a wheel; domesticated an animal; or a crop. He had no written language; no literature whatever; no numerals or calendar; or system of measurements.