Download Category: Secret Societies

THE JEWS, like other childish people, enjoy pretending, and when pretending brings them the tribute due to the character assumed, they revel in it.
In this way they have obtained much credit, which should not have been given to them.
They were first tricked out in borrowed traditions and supplied with an entirely false idea of themselves about 430 B.C.
Then commenced the Great Jewish Masque, a pretence which has been maintained to the present day.
In recent times it has never lacked support. Indeed, Jewish propaganda has been so insidious and persistent that voluntary aid, in addition to other kinds, has always been available. At a mere hint, troupes of highly placed carpet-baggers don ass’s ears, or a long nose, and vie with each other, and with the kosher mummers, in endeavours to lead the rout.

Timothy Matthews – Catholic Insight March 2009

Western civilization at the present day is passing through a crisis which is essentially different from anything that has been previously experienced. Other societies in the past have changed their social institutions or their religious beliefs under the influence of external forces or the slow development of internal growth. But none, like our own, has ever consciously faced the prospect of a fundamental alteration of the beliefs and institutions on which the whole fabric of social life rests … Civilization is being uprooted from its foundations in nature and tradition and is being reconstituted in a new organisation which is as artificial and mechanical as a modern factory. Christopher Dawson. Enquiries into Religion and Culture, p. 259.

MOST OF SATAN’S WORK IN THE WORLD HE TAKES CARE TO KEEP HIDDEN. But two small shafts of light have been thrown onto his work for me just recently. The first, a short article in the Association of Catholic Women’s ACW Review; the second, a remark (which at first surprised me) from a priest in Russia who claimed that we now, in the West, live in a Communist society. These shafts of light help, especially, to explain the onslaught of officialdom which in many countries worldwide has so successfully been removing the rights of parents to be the primary educators and protectors of their children.

THE ULTRA-SECRET CONSPIRACY in the Middle East Revealed: The Donmeh, the Wahhabi and Zionism’s Sephardic Jewry

The following exposé is critical if one is to have any clear understanding of the ever-changing geopolitcal chessboard of the Middle East. All the major players are seen in a different light when the following secret history is properly considered. (Click here)

Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Israel, Iran, Iraq, Libya and their relationships with each other make much more sense in view of these crucial revelations. The foreign policies of the United States and United Kingdom toward each of these countries and the Mideast in general particularly take on new meaning, as does their ‘special’ relationship with Israel.

THIS IS A REPRINT OF A PAMPHLET I PUBLISHED TWENTY-FOUR YEARS AGO when the trail of the murder in Dallas was still warm. A conspiracy is a combination of two or more persons with the intent to commit an unlawful act. With the renewed interest in this most highly publicized murder in American history through the movie JFK, it was decided to reprint the truth as I studied it for the two years between 1966 to 1968 and set my findings forth as I did then, letting the chips fall where they may. I will be presenting an entirely different version than the dozen or more that have been published before. Since my first edition hit the streets in August, 1968, I have read many of the later theoretical solutions to this murder, including the 625 page book, Crossfire, by Jim Marrs, the basis of Oliver Stone’s movie JFK. I still stand by what was written years ago. I can assure the reader that one does not need 625 pages to solve this murder! The reader is only asked to read the evidence presented and make up his own mind about what happened in Dallas, Texas on November 22 1963. We will not debate the issue further with anyone. We are not interested in radio talk shows, television appearances or public speaking engagements on the data contained herein.

My Humble Dedication

This pamphlet is dedicated to the one far-sighted man, the late Raymond La Bombarde, American Patriot and Industrialist, of Nashua, New Hampshire. It was through his financial help and personal encouragement, extended to me years ago, that kept my publications going and made our two years of exhaustive research for this publication financially possible. Well done, good and faithful servant.

Reproduction Encouraged

This pamphlet is not copyrighted. Anyone is free to publish his own pamphlets or newsletter, containing our research, with or without credits to the author. Americans who wish to republish this pamphlet in quantity for distribution in your home area will be sent high-quality masters prepared for off-set webb printing for the price of $20.00. All we ask is that you respect the common law rights to our work and not alter its contents in any way except to include your local address as to where additional copies can be obtained. This would be a good fund-raising project for your church, club or organization.

THE TALMUD gets its name from the word Lamud – taught, and means The Teaching. By metonymy it is taken to mean the book which contains the Teaching, which is called Talmud, that is, the doctrinal book which alone fully expounds and explains all the knowledge and teaching of the Jewish people.

As to the origin of the Talmud, the Rabbis regard Moses as its first author. They hold that, besides the written law which Moses received from God on Mount Sinai on tables of stone, which is called Torah Schebiktab, he also received interpretations of it, or the oral law, which is called Torah Shebeal Peh. They say that this is the reason why Moses remained so long on the mountain, as God could have given him the written law in one day.

Moses is said to have transmitted this oral law to Joshua; Joshua in turn to the seventy Elders; the Elders to the Prophets, and the Prophets to the Great Synagogue. It is held that it was later transmitted successively to certain Rabbis until it was no longer possible to retain it orally.

Whatever may be said about this story of the Rabbis, it is sufficiently known to us that before the birth of Christ, schools existed in Palestine in which sacred literature was taught. The commentaries of the Doctors of the law were noted down on charts and lists as an aid to memory, and these, when collected together, formed the beginnings of the Jewish Talmud.

In the second century after Christ, Rabbi Jehuda who, because of the sanctity of his life, was called The Saint, and The Prince, realizing that the learning of the Jews was diminishing, that their oral law was being lost, and that the Jewish people were being dispersed, was the first to consider ways and means of restoring and preserving their oral law. He collected all the lists and charts and from them he made a book which was called the Sepher Mischnaioth, or Mischnah – a Deuterosis, or secondary law. He divided it into six parts, each of which was divided into many chapters. We shall consider these later.

The Mischnah is the foundation and the principal part of the whole Talmud. This book was accepted by the Jews everywhere and was recognized as their authentic code of law. It was expounded in their Academies in Babylon – at Sura, Iumbaditha and Nehardea – and in their Academies in Palestine – at Tiberias, Iamnia and Lydda.

As their interpretations increased with the passing of time, the disputations and decisions of the doctors of the law concerning the Mischnah were written down, and these writings constituted another part of the Talmud called the Gemarah.

These two parts are so disposed throughout the whole Talmud that the Mischnah serves first as a kind of text of the law, and is followed by the Gemarah as an analysis of its various opinions leading to definite decisions.

All the precepts of the Mischnah, however, were not discussed in the Jewish schools. Those whose use was nullified by the destruction of the Temple, and those whose observation was possible only in the Holy Land were not commented upon. Their explanation was left until the coming of Elias and the Messiah. For this reason some parts of the Mischnah are lacking in the Gemarah.

In interpreting the Mischnah of Rabbi Jehuda, the schools of Palestine and Babylon followed each their own method, and by thus following their own way gave rise to a twofold Gemarah – the Jerusalem and the Babylonian versions. The author of the Jerusalem version was Rabbi Jochanan, who was head of the synagogue in Jerusalem for eighty years. He wrote thirty-nine chapters of commentaries on the Mischnah which he compiled in the year 230 A.D.

SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL THE “PEOPLE OF THE TALMUD” have looked for a temporal Messiah who would ascend to the “Throne of David” and literally put the material world under his feet and cause all “goy” to worship at the feet of the self-chosen people. Rejecting the thought that Jesus came to “fulfil the law and the prophets,” the People of the Talmud expect their rewards in this world, not in the next. This religion was uncompromisingly described by the philosopher and historian, Horace Meyer Kallen, of the New School for Social Research, in his Zionism and World Politics. We quote from page 9 of that work: “For them (the Jews), reward and punishment were here and now, where sin and virtue were, and the hope of good fortune for the righteous was a hope for this world and not another. Particularly this was the case for a whole people, a nation, whose span of life overreaches the brief mortality of the individual. The people of Israel, banished from its land for its unrighteousness, should be restored for its righteousness. This was Yahweh’s promise, and in this promise his people might take comfort. The restoration would be bodily, political, and physical. It would install an era of international peace and international comity, the rule of law replacing the rule of force and the life of cooperation, the life of conflict….

“This restoration, from the first exile in the seventh century before the beginning of the Christian era through the first millennium after it, is conceived in political terms..”

In these words Professor Kallen, Zionist and Talmudist, explains the whole of what we have come to know as the “Messianic Complex” of those who call themselves” Jews. They rejected the true Messiah because He refused to reign over them as a temporal king; told them that His Kingdom was not of this world; and also told them to render unto Caesar the things that were Caesar’s and unto God the things that were God’s. But the Pharisees expected physical, material, temporal fulfilment of prophecy; and could not divide the spiritual from the political.

This makes it impossible to oppose Zionism, Communism, and Socialism without also opposing Talmudism. For all are political, materialistic, oligarchic, and anti-Christian!

Appendix 1:
Jewish Freemasonry on the Subversion of the Catholic Church and State

THIS shocking document was first published in the London Catholic Gazette of February 1936 under the heading of “The Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church.” Its contents were smuggled out of a series of speeches delivered at secret Jewish meetings in Paris. A few weeks later its authenticity was unexpectedly verified when the Parisian weekly, Le Revell du Peuple, published a similar account, adding that the statements had been made at a recent convention of the Jewish B’nai-B’rith, the secret directors of international freemasonry. The article of the Catholic Gazette read as follows:

“As long as there remains among the Gentiles any moral conception of the social order, and until all faith, patriotism, and dignity are uprooted, our reign over the world shall not come–-And the Gentiles, in their stupidity, have proved easier dupes than we expected them to be. One would expect more intelligence and more practical common sense, but they are no better than a herd of sheep. Let them graze in our fields till they become fat enough to be worthy of being immolated to our future King of the World…

We have founded many secret associations, which all work for our purpose, under our orders and our direction. We have made it an honour,
a great honour, for the Gentiles to join us in our organizations, which are, thanks to our gold, flourishing now more than ever. Yet it remains our secret that those Gentiles who betray their own and most precious interests, by joining us in our plot, should never know that those associations are of our creation, and that they serve our purpose.

A Report of the Address given by Mrs. Arthur Webster on 30th November, 1920, at the ROYAL ARTILLERY INSTITUTION, WOOLWICH; and on the 10th March, 1921, to the BRIGADE OF GUARDS,. at the United Services Institute, Whitehall.

The following is a report of the address of Mrs. Arthur Webster, as delivered at a meeting in the Royal Artillery Institution, Woolwich, on 30th November, 1920. The address was, by a special request, repeated before the officers and non-commissioned officers of the Brigade of Guards at the United ‘Services Institute, Whitehall, on 10th. March, 1921.

No better piece of education exists with which to fight the general public ignorance in 1932 than this address of 1920, on those secret forces: behind revolution which have accomplished such incalculable injuries meantime to Christianity, to our Empire, and to our national social and industrial well-being.

BE it Remembered, that on the 14th day of September, in the thirty-fifth year of the independence of the United States of America, Margaret B. Bonneville, of the said District, has depo­sited in this Office, the title of a Book, the right whereof she claims as proprietor, in the words following, to wit :

IN conformity to the Act of the Congress of the United States, entitled, ” An Act for the Encouragement of Learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned,” and also to an act, entitled 46 An Act supplementary to an act for the Encouragement of Learning, by se­curing the copies of Maps, Charts, and Books to the authors and propri­etors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned, and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of Designing, Engraving, and Etching Historical and other Prints.”

C H S. CLINTON; clerk of the District of New-York.

FEW words have acquired such a wide signification as the word symbol. Originally applied, amongst the Greeks, to the two halves of the tablet they divided between themselves as a pledge of hospitality — in the manner of our contract forms, detached along a line of perforations from the counterfoil record — it was gradually extended to the engraved shells by which those initiated in the mysteries made themselves known to each other; and even to the more or less esoteric formulas and sacramental rites that may be said to have constituted the visible bond of their fellowship. At the same time its meaning was so amplified as to include on the one hand oracles, omens, and every extraordinary phenomenon that could be passed off as a warning from the gods, and on the other, military pass-words, badges of corporate bodies, tokens of attendance, and pledges of every kind, from the wedding ring, to the ring deposited before partaking of a banquet as an earnest for the due payment of one’s share of it. In short the term came to gradually mean everything, that whether by general agreement or by analogy, conventionally represented something or somebody.

A symbol might be defined as a representation which does not aim at being a reproduction. A reproduction implies if not identify with, at least similitude to, the original; but a symbol only requires that it shall have certain features in common with the object represented, so that, by its presence alone, it may evoke the conception of the latter, as is the case with a missile weapon and lightning, a sickle and harvest-time, a ring and marriage, a pair of scales and the idea of justice, kneeling and the sentiment of submission, and so forth.

By symbolism the simplest, the commonest objects are transformed, idealized, and acquire a new and, so to say, an illimitable value. In the Eleusinian mysteries, the author of Philosophoumena relates that, at the initiation to the higher degree, “there was exhibited as the great, the admirable, the most perfect object of mystic contemplation, an ear of corn that had been reaped in silence. The scrap of cloth which, in ordinary circumstances, we discard as a rag, at the top of a staff sums up all the aspirations included in the idea of ones country; and two crossed lines suffice to recall to millions of Christians the redemption of the world by the voluntary sacrifice of a god.

We live in the midst of symbolical representations, from the ceremonies celebrating a birth to the funereal emblems adorning the tomb; from the shaking of hands all round of a morning to the applause with which we gratify the actor, or lecturer, of the evening; from the impressions figuring on the seal of our letters to the bank notes in our pocket-book. The pictorial and plastic arts are naught else but symbolism, even when they claim to adhere to the servile imitation of reality. We write, as we speak, in symbols; and it is in symbols again that we think, if those schools of philosophy are to be believed which affirm our powerlessness to perceive things in themselves. The philosophy of evolution goes the length of proclaiming, through the organ of its founder, that the conception of force, to which it refers all phenomena, is simply the symbol of an unknown and unknowable Reality. Herbert Spencer even adds, in the most explicit terms, that it will always be permissible for us to picture to ourselves that Reality by concrete symbols, so long as we do not regard them as resemblances of that for which they stand.