IN April 1945, Dr. Raphael Lemkin (an adviser on international law to the former League of Nations) provided an important review of the primary techniques of genocide, as employed by the Nazis. Those techniques included: the partitioning of previously unified countries into administrative regions to destroy political cohesion; attacking existing cultural structures to weaken national resolve and obliterate former cultural patterns; the use of schools to poison the minds of vulnerable children; the undermining of the spiritual and communal foundations of the established Christian church; the promotion of pornography, alcohol and gambling to create moral debasement within the national group; the destruction of the industrial infrastructure and economic independence of the country; and (most especially) the use of various means to reduce the existing population, and the birthrate, of the targeted native people.[1]
Such techniques closely parallel those of the Marxist Frankfurt School. And both originate from the same malfeasant philosophy of forcing extreme and un-consented social change, by undermining the existing homogeneity of a sovereign country. It is a political process that accrues power by inciting hatred towards others – and thereby providing to itself, and to its supporters, a self-serving and perverse justification for the perpetual discovery of ‘others’ requiring elimination.
In the decades following the Dr. Lemkin report, a covert form of genocide has been developed as a single, ‘progressive’ political doctrine – but one which still retains the core techniques, as outlined above. Although ‘progressivism’ is an ideology that promotes itself as ultra-liberal and tolerant, an arguably more apt description (given the globally redefined, racist hatemongering) is ‘progressive-Nazism’.