Eustace Mullins 2

THIS IS NOT A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES. For forty years I have schooled myself, not to write the Economic History of the U.S. or any other country, but to write an epic poem which begins “In the Dark Forest” crosses the Purgatory of human error, and ends in the light, “fra i maestri di color che sanno”. For this reason I have had to understand the NATURE of error. But I don’t think it necessary to refer to each particular case of error.

I do not believe that the method of historiography has progressed much since the days when Confucius selected the documents of the old kingdoms, and condensed his conclusions in the Testament. Aristotle toward the end of his life arrived at a similar method, in his collection of Greek State Constitutions. Voltaire used the “human” method which hinges on chance and the personal element. A prince eats a pudding and dies of acute indigestion at a critical moment. Caesar Borgia said : “I had anticipated everything except being bedridden the day my father died.” Michelet analyses the motives of different social groups and tells us that the manual labourer wants to own a shop because he thinks shop-keepers don’t work. Another method consists in analysing certain mechanisms invented to humbug the public. Perhaps it is the renewal of an Aristotelian tendency but, in any event, it is suitable for the present narrative, and I am following it in this essay or definition, of the struggle between the people and the usurers, or financiers, in the colonies, and then in the United States of North America.

The body of this ms. was written and left my hands in February 1933.  40 publishers have refused it.  No typescript of mine has been read by so many people or brought me a more interesting correspondence.  It is here printed verbatim, unaltered.  I had not seen the ms. from the time it left Rapallo till it returned here with the galley proof.  It is printed as record of what I saw in February 1933.  The September preface (1933) indicated a flutter of hope, that has grown steadily more fluttery and less hopeful.

ONE element of the Duce’s gamut is the continual gentle diatribe against all that is “anti-storico,” all that is against historic process.

Obviously a parliamentary system which is in Italy an exotic. a XIXth century fad, imported ad hoc, for temporal reason, a doctrinaires’ game in North Italy, a diplomatic accident in the South, is not in the blood and bone of Italians.

Vittorio Emanuele had reasons, and even necessities of state pushing him to it, at least as top dressing.

What it signified de facto in Turin, is best exemplified by the specific occasion on which a Peidmontese parliament refused to sign on the dotted line of a treaty.  Victor told the people to elect another that would.

The system went into effect in Naples to avoid technical terms in a treaty with Austria.

Given a little time and leisure (XII years) Mussolini emerges with a scheme for ascertaining the will of the people that will be at least in intention more efficient than elected politicians, divided by geographical districts.  He wants a council where every kind of man will be represented by some bloke of his own profession, by some deputy who has identical interests and a direct knowledge of the needs and temptations of a given profession.

One of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s ancestors was Isaac Roosevelt, first director of the New York Trust after the Revolutionary War, when Alexander Hamilton betrayed our young Republic by funding the national debt and placing us in the hands of Jewish financiers in France and Holland.

As a young Harvard lawyer, FDR found himself one of the poorer Roosevelts. Old ex-President Theodore Roosevelt was living in comfort in Oyster Bay, after having made thirty-five million dollars profit in gold from the United States Treasury in one operation for J.P. Morgan Co. (Rothschild) & J. & W. Seligman Co., New York, when he purchased the Panama Canal. When he sued the New York World for libel for printing some of the more interesting particulars of this case, the United States Supreme Court unanimously threw out Roosevelt’s suit.

His son, Theodore Roosevelt, Jr., was to do his bit for the family honor by acting as finger man in the hundred million dollar swindle, the Teapot Dome oil scandals of 1924. Despite the fact that he was publicized as the man who got Harding to sign the oil-land release to Sinclair, Theodore Roosevelt, Jr., then Assisstant Secretary of the Navy, formerly director of Sinclair Oil Co., was not even called to testify at the Congressional Hearings. In Some unexplained manner, this distinguished American became a General in the United States Army, and, venturing too near the front lines in France during the Second World War, heard a gun go off nearby and fell dead of a heart attack, thus vindicating the fighting tradition of his family.

WHEN I WAS A CHILD, DURING THE 1930’S DEPRESSION, my school teacher often commented to our class about the sufferings of our native state, Virginia. She spoke not only of the rigors of the Civil War, but of its even more devastating aftermath, the Reconstruction and the carpetbagger empire. She pointed out that, since the conclusion of the Civil War, or the War Between the States, as we termed it, Northern bankers had continued to exercise a dominant role over our businesses and our government.

Some fifty years later, Gary Arnold asked me to look into a firm which had been opposing his conservative philosophy in California. The firm, Media General, was a familiar one to me. It was the result of an expansion by Virginia’s leading newspaper monopoly, Richmond Newspapers, which had become an empire composed of newspapers, radio and TV, cable-vision, newsprint manufacturers, and financial services. From its power base at the seat of the state government in Richmond in the carpetbagger era, it had become the state’s primary news monopoly.

Richmond Newspapers (now Media General) is a $500 million a year operation which was founded by Joseph Bryan in the heyday of the carpetbagger empire. His son, John Stewart Bryan, ran the newspapers from 1900 until his death in 1944. John Stewart Bryan was a lieutenant commander in Naval Intelligence, chairman of the 5th Federal Reserve District, and to prove his stellar liberal credentials, he was appointed to the board of overseers of Harvard University.

Every American today is a victim of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s policies. Inflation, the vast and inextinguishable debt, the vicious group of international revolutionaries still ensconced in the highest echelons of government; these and many other ills can be traced directly to the reign of King Franklin the First. Malevolence and megalomania were the
hallmarks of Roosevelt’s relationships with others. One of his many victims was the poet, George Sylvester Viereck.

Viereck’s father was the results of a liaison between Kaiser Wilhelm I and Edwina Viereck, an actress who was called the most beautiful woman in Europe. In his room at the Hotel Belleclaire, Viereck kept a marble bust of his grandmother which did justice to her fame. Because of this kinship, Viereck was customarily addressed as “cousin” by Kaiser Wilhelm II and other members of European royalty. With this entree, he was received everywhere, and he conducted many widely published interviews with such luminaries as Henry Ford, Lloyd George, Hitler and many others.

Viereck’s volumes of poetry were given front page reviews in the New York Times Book section, and his poem, “Nineveh,” describing New York City, was President Theodore Roosevelt’s favourite verse. “Teddy” carried a copy in his wallet and loved to haul it out and read it to visitors. During the 1920’s and 1930’s, Viereck was one of the most popular and highly paid journalists in America, featured weekly in the Saturday Evening Post, Liberty, and other mass circulation magazines.

Modern Jewelry, a trade publication circulated to the nation’s jewelry stores, is not a magazine generally read by American anti-Communists. The June, 1988 issue carried a full page advertisement featuring the former Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger. Paid for by the Diamond, Jewelry and Watch Division of the United Jewish Appeal and Federation of Jewish Philanthropies, the advertisement headlined an earnest Henry Kissinger’s appeal to “Demonstrate your solidarity with our brothers and sisters in Israel.” Solidarity, of course, is a key word in the
lexicon of Jewish international socialism and finance. That is why international agitators in Poland named their movement “solidarity”. Solidarity has always been the watchword of the American labour movement, in which American workers were compelled by law to pay a tax, called union dues, to international Jewish socialist organizations allied with the lowest and most vicious underworld terrorists.

UJA chairman of the dinner, to be held at Marriott Marquis on Broadway in New York City, was Andrew H. Tisch, of the family which now owns CBS and until recently dominated the U.S. Postal Service. Kissinger was to receive $35.000 for his charitable workout, but not to worry; UJA expected each diner, a wealthy jeweler, to make at least a ten thousand dollar donation to the UJA, tax free, the tax burden to be thrust later on American workers, Think of that ten thousand dollar donation the next time you stop in at your friendly local jewelry store.

During the American Revolution, despite the fact that the population was almost equally divided between patriots and Tories, there was no dearth of Americans willing to risk all they owned for the Cause of Liberty. For many of them, this was a great deal, as they were successful landowners and businessmen.

Over two hundred years later, on, it is useful to examine the leadership of the patriotic movement as I have observed it during the past fifty five years. I have seen countless workers, many of them unsung, who gave as unstintingly as did the Washingtons and Jeffersons of another day. Today, the majority of those who sacrifice for their country are wage earners barely able to keep up with rampant inflation, and the elderly eking out an existence on tiny pensions. Many of them give to the so called Christian leaders of the right wing, who rake in millions while they declaim that they are one hundred per cent supporters of the State of Israel.

Many few years ago, when I was working for Mr. H. L. Hunt, he coined the term, the Mistaken, for those who sabotage America in the service of alien powers. He labelled those who help America the Constructives. It would be an error to suppose that the Mistaken are limited to those who lead the Zionists in their Satanic mission to destroy Christian civilization. Some of the Mistaken have come to lodge in the patriotic movement, placed there by the machinations of the Anti-Defamation League and its countless subterranean operatives.

When one surveys the present crop of United States Senators, it is obvious that that body no longer provides the melodrama on Capitol Hill. During the 1930’s, the Senators, particularly those from the Southern states, outdid themselves in colourful language, plantation owner attire, complete with wide brimmed Panama hats, and a cold-blooded approach to political dominance which has not been seen since they vanished like the dinosaurs of old. Today, we have such creatures as Senator Metzenbaum of Ohio, making $300,000 deals over his office phone, his colleague, Senator-Glenn, still reeling from the after effects of his trips through outer space, and, in the historic State of Virginia, Senator Warner, who parlayed his advantage of being born into a good family by marrying two of the wealthiest women in the United States.

In the 1930’s, no one in the United States Senate more successfully wielded political power than Senator Harry Byrd, the senior Senator from Virginia. His career on Capitol Hill remains the how to-do-it Bible for would-be politicians, even though no one today has either the temerity or the ruthlessness to follow in his footsteps.

From the very outset of his career, Harry Byrd knew where the power lay, and he went after it. In reviewing his personal history, one finds few mistakes, despite flaws of personality which effectively prevented him from attaining the supreme prize, one which was often near his grasp, the office of President of the United States.

In 1935, Senator Huey Long published a startling book, Every Man a King! Don’t look for it today, because you won’t find it. Franklin D. Roosevelt and his Jewish control operator, Felix Frankfurter, the mastermind of the Harold Ware cell of Communists in Washington, were so terrified by this book that they began to consider plans for the assassination of Huey Long.

Soon afterward, Huey Long died in a hail of bullets, and the book disappeared from circulation. What was the message of Huey Long’s book, which seemed certain to sweep him into the White House in 1936, and which became his death warrant?

The message was in the title, “Every Man a King.” Huey Long believed with the deep patriotic fervor which characterized all of his beliefs, that every American was a king in his native land, beholden to no man, and enslaved at no man’s bidding. Roosevelt, and the sinister crew of aliens, who rolled him about in his wheelchair and who brought him women for his bizarre sexual tastes, had a different slogan, one which they dared not advertise: “Every American a Slave.” There could be no doubt as to the relative popular appeal of these two political slogans. The Great Cripple and his Ghetto Gang would not stand a chance against Huey Long in 1936.

In my thirty-five years as a practicing economist, one of my greatest difficulties has been convincing patriots that they must understand the problem of inflation—the Jewish disease—if they are to prevail against the depredations of the biological parasite. As the patriot Ezra Pound said to me some thirty years ago, “Inflation is robbery.” This is still the shortest and best definition of inflation. Pound explained to me that many centuries ago, rulers discovered that their regimes could he imperiled by any tampering with the value of the circulation medium of exchange, or money, and therefore they imposed the death penalty on anyone who committed this offence. At that time, “inflation” meant the depreciation of gold or silver coins by clipping them, trimming a minute amount of precious metal from the rims so that it could hardly be detected. In modern times, inflation means tampering with the value of the paper certificates which circulate and are accepted as money. A person with inside knowledge of such tampering could borrow one million dollars, knowing that inflation would allow him to increase the value of his borrowing to perhaps ten million dollars, and at the same time reduce his debt to about one hundred thousand dollars.

As I pointed out in The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, the Jews won this power to alter the value of the American dollar at their pleasure, first by consolidating the money and credit of the people of the United States into a central bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, and then by setting up the mechanism, the Open Market Committee, to raise or lower the purchasing power of the dollar whenever they wished. These mechanisms were worked out by Paul Warburg, partner of the international Jewish banking house of Kuhn, Loeb, Co., New York, and the American representative of the Rothschild interests, and were enacted into law by Congress in 1913, against the bitter protests of such American patriots as Congressman Charles Lindbergh. The Federal Reserve Act was engineered through Congress by Virginian Carter Glass and signed into law by Virginian Woodrow Wilson.