QUESTION: Who are the Hunza people of Northern India? Are they white people? We would like a comment on these people.
ANSWER: When Alexander the Great was pushing toward the East and finally stormed the heights of the Himalayas, he was preparing for an attack upon India. Alexander the Great was basically, of course, in his recognition of white leadership. For he thought that with Macedonia and Greece united, he would have a strong opportunity to carry the areas of victory over to the Aryan Persians. The Aryan Persians came down from the North. They had fought no battles were moving for a pincher movement upon the Mongolians coming out of the Steppes. Alexander wanted to move with one force of his army across the Himalayas while with the other, he would move down on India where Hinduism was running rampant. His design was to crush Hinduism and put white leadership over the areas of India and join with the white Persians coming down out of the Steppes. And of course the strong Aryan control which has been over India had been somewhat overturned by this massive Hindu area of victories. The Emperor had fought against the Aryan Emperor. And the Aryan Emperor was over the most populated and civilized area of India, but the Hindu Emperor had gathered the great masses of Hindus back along the mountain ranges of the Himalayas. And realizing there was an Aryan Emperor who had left the areas of his basic throne, and had moved into Mantelet, this Hindu Emperor moved in. The concept of Alexander the Great was to push for the conquest of India. He also wanted to bring this other arm of his forces up to join with the Persians. And then they would come down through the passes into India.
Question: Is a Jew a Mongrel?
Answer: Well yes, but you could have a mongrel without it being a Jew. You could have a mongrel come out of any, say, a South Sea Islander and a Chinese who would not necessarily have been out of Cain or Lucifer’s line. A Jew has to come down from the Luciferian fallen Angel line sowed into the various races. You sow different Jews together and you just get Jewish mongrels, all colours of Jews. In other words if you have a Chinese Jew and a Negro Jew you only come up with another mixture of Jews. But if any of a Jewish line mixed in with any other then you just have a Jew, there is no such thing as a part Jew.
Question: Doesn’t God put any of His Holy Seed into a mongrel?
Question: Well, do you think the Devil would pass up that seed?
Answer: Now wait a moment, the Issue of the Adamic seed is the only Holy seed in the earth. Therefore if this seed intermingles with another race there is no spiritual seed in the posterity because there is nothing there to have affinity with. The Chinese for instance, they would be existent as creative people and they have their own seed after they were created, for ‘seed having life in itself’ is the rule. Therefore they are not the offspring of God, but creations of God, and were good before their fall. So He does not supply seed for the increasing posterity under the subordination of Lucifer, while worshiping the Darkness. All they do then is have a cycle of return. Every Asiatic then who is born in a re‑incarnated spirit until the restoration of all things. But there is no new seed for expansion. This is why the kingdom of darkness does not get beyond the point which it was in for the hour of its fall, although existent by the millions.
QUESTION: Did you see the program on T.V. about Stonehenge? And was it authentic?
ANSWER: I did not see it as I was away from home, but we know how it was built and by whom. It was built by our ancestors, and built prior to the advent of Israel into the Isles. It was built by Aryans who had proceeded them, and they had gone to Avebury because this was to be located at the very place they wanted it to be. There was also Do‑Ring’s over on the Persian Gulf like this, and up in Burma in the Himalaya Mountains. Our forbearers had gone into India from there given them the highest order of civilization they had ever seen, had sent their savants into the highlands of Burma, and there set another Stonehenge. These 3 citing places, like the Great Pyramid were set to measure, not only for the procession of the equinoxes, but with them they could measure accurately the furthermost areas of the positioning of the moon and its changes, over the cycle of years as every six to nine years there is an alternating cycle, but they set those stones so perfectly that they could get the exact movement in relation to the planets of the Solar System, and their alignments. And they were watching and using this not only for the complete dates for the equinoxes, but they were waiting for certain configurations in the heavens. The one which was most important for them was for this Embodiment and coming of the Messiah.
BEFORE WE GO INTO THE QUESTIONS, WE MIGHT JUST MENTION SOMETHING MRS. WOODARD was talking about, in the Book of Revelation. Whereas what pertained to the Book of Revelation might not pertain to any other Book unless some area of prophecy, but we think this is rather unique about it for it is fraudulent and John never wrote it. John wrote the Book of Revelation but there are lots of things translated today which he never wrote, and this is rather interesting, for you can take the lexicons and you can also go back into the earliest of the codices of the Greek and you find this is true. John never wrote in Greek, he wrote entirely in Aramaic.
It was translated from Aramaic to Greek. This work was laboriously done down in Alexandria, Egypt where Mark was pastor of the Christian church there. Now; at the end of the Book, this was never existent until about the 3rd., century, when this passage was put in this Book and it said: ‘If any man shall take away from the words of this Book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life, and out of the holy city, and from the things written in this Book.’ In the first place when you look at that verse you know it was phoney from the word go because the Book of Life was written before the foundation of the world. God said: those HE did foreknow, HE did pre‑determine that they would conform to the image of the son (embodiment).
QUESTION: About the Pyramids in Mexico, about their background and how do they compare with those in Egypt?
ANSWER: Well, the Pyramids of Mexico are real Ancient and they go back into Pre‑Mayan times or very early Mayan Kingdoms. There is a possibility that some of the later Pyramids buildings are by Mayans themselves of this Step Pyramid building for this was influenced by the Tribe of Manasseh who came over about 760 B.C., and came into Central America from the Caribbean. Of course this was the coming of the White God of the skies whose children were to come. According to old prophecies they had almost in all the records of the Ancient people in South and Central America some record of the expected coming of these white sons of the Eternal God of the Heavens. But the most developed areas of it was among the Mayas. The Toltecs were also a very old civilization like the Maya, and we know that the Manasseh people, to the Maya, were received as the Divine Off‑spring of the God of the Sky. They effected the culture of the Maya, and even the Toltec to some extent in that time, but then Aztec demon gods got involved later, and the Asiatic Aztec gods were very evil, demonic things. The Mayans were a much more peaceful society, and their culture was advanced by the coming of the white man. And they included in their records the knowledge of such things as the flood of Noah’s time. They have this woven into the Mayan traditions but in weaving these in they relate themselves to it. In other words, this is all in their history of this race of the heavens and so forth. So this being true then there was some changes made in their architecture, in their temples, in the Yucatan, but the temples around Mexico city go back 11,000 or more years. These Temples are covered with lava and radio carbon precludes their great antiquity.
QUESTION: What were the words Jesus said on the Cross if they weren’t, ‘Why hast thou forsaken me?’
ANSWER: You mean: li, E‑li, La‑ma, Sa‑bach, Tha‑ni? It wasn’t actually, why has thou forsaken me, although this was the way it was translated into Greek and into Latin, etc. This is the human spirit which cries out as the soul is about to leave the body. The soul consciousness cries out, Oh, Great Spirit (God) wouldest that this need not happen. If the Greek translation would have stayed with the Aramaic in which it was originally written the cry would have been: that the flesh now felt the spirit leaving it, and knew that it was abandoned unto to death, and this was the flesh that now speaks. But, then it adds, An Dias, in Latin, or So be the will of Deity. So the flesh recognizes the sovereignty of the spirits right to go, and knew that the fullness of God dwelt bodily in HIM. So these words were, well, to put your hands on these words in the original text except you put your hands on the Old Alexandrian Codex, whereas they took it from the old original Aramaic text, .this is impossible for most today. But the Aramaic from the Book of John and other Gospels were to mention this in the 7 cries of the Cross, and from study you realize that the flesh now cried out in agony as the spirit was leaving it. It cried out because it was suffering, but it also was willing to receive this because of the Will of the Spirit. See? But the cry is a great anguish cry as far as theology is concerned. But anytime you get any display, upon the body of God of unwillingness, this is error. Because he fully was willing to do anything which was to be done. The only thing He did in anguish was to create a background for the intensity of what was involved. So again when He said; ‘It is finished’, it was with full cognition that the Spirit was leaving the body, and it would die, within a few moments. See? But He knew, and He released the Spirit. If He had wanted to He could have kept the spirit in the body and stayed there on the Cross for days. In fact He could have come down from the Cross if He had wanted to. But this would gainsay His own purpose, because this was the body of God which was carrying the physical suffering.
QUESTION: Would you want to explain your statement that there is more than one judgment, and the different Resurrections?
ANSWER I don’t want to get into that tonight, but I will say that judgments are constant. This idea that the judgments are set up for one specific time is erroneous. Judgements are constant, there are continual judgements based on the law of existence. So what so ever has been put together in the exactness of His law are constant, continual judgements, and come by the continual violations of the law. Whether the economic, political or social law still the law exists backing its judgments. Violate the law of proper rotations of the soil, and you soon destroy the soil, its life and vitality. You don’t have to wait for judgment day you have it immediately. Violate the economic law and the mechanics which you create already starts the shortage with in the structure of the circulation of money. You can’t take a high percentage out of the production merely for the use of money without eventually shorting a whole area of exchange. This is why usury is a violation of Divine law, and usury always destroys itself with depressions, and crashes, and it can only build up so far and then it wipes itself out, it carries its own judgment.
The areas of moral law does this also, it leads to broken homes, whole areas of upset social patterns. We have tried to create around the image of God an idea of a God just working for revenge, and lots of times we may have created the idea that man sows in one field and reaps in another, and this is fallacy. You reap in the same field in which you sow, you do not sow in one field and reap in another. You don’t sow in a physical world, and reap in the Celestial, this you do not do. The processes of the violation of law creates the conditions both as to how it reacts on the nervous system, and in their areas of thinking and hypertension. Violation of Divine Law, brings about disintegration of the body, brings about conditions which bring on death. “For the wages of sin is death”.
QUESTION: Have you ever gone into this question about the wheels in the first book of Ezekiel?
ANSWER: .We have discussed that in various bible studies. And the Book of Ezekiel is rather hard to understand when they translated it into English because they didn’t understand what it was talking about. The Wheels are flying saucers as we would call them today, space crafts. As they translated it into English they did not understand that what Ezekiel was talking about was moving, pulsing crafts with people in them. They sort of thought there were creatures in them because they moved. Actually it was a description of the same kind of space craft as described by Enoch, and that is found in the Apocalypse of Paul, the kind we see today when we try to focus on them. But you will note that he said a whirlwind came out of the north, and a great cloud, and a fire was enfolding itself, and brightness was about, and out of the mist thereof as the colour of Amber, out of the midst of the fire.
QUESTION: Isn’t it true that some words of the Apostles were changed from their original Gospels?
ANSWER: Yes, that is true, and it is a matter of interest that many Christians don’t know this. They don’t realize that the Jews tampered with even the New Testament texts. Now the early church Gospels and Epistles were written in Aramaic and some in Greek. John wrote in Aramaic but Luke, who was a doctor, wrote in Classical Greek. Luke could have written in Aramaic and he did write some in Latin, thus showing that he had a full knowledge of Latin as well, then Matthew and Mark wrote their Gospels in Aramaic.
Now, all of these Gospels went to the early churches, and Mark was Pastor of the Church in Alexandria, Egypt. This was one of the oldest Christian Churches of Great Strength, and one of the greatest cities of the Roman Empire. This city of Alexandria, Egypt had been a great city ever since the conquering of Egypt by the Greeks, and had remained a great city in the Roman Empire.
Now, of course the Greeks were Scythians and great areas of Greek culture remained in Alexandria even after it became part of the Roman Empire. Also one of the greatest libraries of all times, in history, was established at Alexandria, Egypt, by Alexander the Great. And there were curators from all over the world who came to sell their scrolls and rolls, because this library continued to buy rare rolls and scrolls and catalogue them, even up in the days of Caesar. And even at the time of the Christ this was still a great library and depository for great volumes and here curators, both Greek and Roman paid great prices to add to this library.
QUESTION: This teleportation, some claim they can do this?
ANSWER: You mean disappear here and arrive there? Well! I don’t buy much of it, the only area where this seems to function is in Occultism. And generally it is familiar spirits and whether they ever came from there or were here all the time is questionable. There is a high system of communication in all Celestial realms, and in other realms as well, and of course the Luciferian system is pretty well organized in their many orders, so communication is rather bad in many areas. In many Celestial realms teleportation is used if you want to use that term. We have been told that Christ can be here instantly when summoned or be there, can cross intervene miles by just instantly appearing here and disappearing over there. But there is no Biblical evidence of this. I know nothing about such happenings. So teleportation if it works would seem a more practical way to transit crossing the distance of space. But strangely enough when we have Biblical record of Christ coming to earth as He did when He brought the law to Mount Sinai, He came with 10,000 of His Saints, Administering Spirits, and His Hosts out of the Heavens. And they came in vast fleets, came over Paran and Sinai and came down, Deuteronomy 33, came throwing great search lights down over Paran. Then circled around and came down over Sinai. We know that when Christ ascended He went up on a Mount and a big cloud, hiding something without a doubt, and as Jesus was received into the cloud they didn’t see Him anymore but two men stepped out. This wasn’t something dangling out of space, this was just a cloud sitting on a hill. You couldn’t see what was in the cloud but Jesus stepped into it and two men stepped out saying: why are you looking into the cloud? He will return as you saw him go. Then these men stepped back in the cloud and it went away. You will note in the Old Testament the abiding presence of God is with them whether it be embodied or in Celestial realms. You will note that a great cloud travelled with Israel and it says YAHWEH was in the cloud. This was as though a fire by night, and a radiant Shekinah cloud by day. All this was covering, shielding something they couldn’t see.
QUESTION: There is promises and statements that were made concerning Jerusalem which are true. There are some being made that all this is given to the Jews and that this going back to Jerusalem, of the Jews, is the fulfilment of prophecy, is this true? It is reported that it is a garden place now as the Jews are rebuilding, the question is, could it be that they are Judah, as many think? If they are not then why would God give all these things to the Jews? I have read a number of places that they are Judah???
ANSWER: No place in Scripture does it say that the Jews are Judah. They are Canaanites, Amalakites, Hittites and so forth. Jesus has already told you that are the offspring of Satan, children of the devil. They are the Abomination of the Desolator that was to stand in the last days in this place. To be sure the Jews are trying to develop Palestine and they are spending other peoples money. A large part of the money going to Israeli comes from the United States of America. A large part of it comes from Christians who have been conned out of it. As far as anyone who has been under my ministry and still thinks that the Jews are Judah, they just haven’t listened to well. Because I can tell you that no Jew on the face of the earth can measure up to Judah. There is no place for a Jew to be any part nor lot in this.
The thing I would point out concerning this is that the rains have not yet returned. This is all pieces of figments of imagination spread out over the world to fool Christians, to try to prove to the world that ‘Israel’ has returned, so that they can con the world out of their money to support them, this is what they are up to.
QUESTION: I wonder if you would elaborate on the Biblical History of this which we were discussing before you came in, relative to the rain fall patterns, the severe droughts in some places where as we are getting this unusual rainfall pattern in this valley?
ANSWER: We spoke some months ago maybe a year ago, upon the weather pattern. Of course there has been promised lots of things such as droughts which are judgments. We can prove this, “The LORD can balance the rainfall of the heavens.” The scriptures declares that this is one of His prerogatives. He balances the rainfall, He has many times warned Israel that under certain areas of disobedience He will turn the rainfall of the heavens from above, and when the earth dries up it will become parched. There is no doubt of this, the areas in which this is most important is when they get careless in their recognition that HE alone is God. When they become careless in associating themselves with strangers. When they move into unbridled immorality. Through the course of their actions they violate His laws in the areas of usury, and He says: He would turn the sun and their sky to brass. Also you will note that in the book of Revelation, one end time measure was that on parts of the earth the sun would be so hot they would curse God, but they could not find death. In other words the actual interpretation is, that one of the chastisement is that it would not kill men, but so inconvenience men that they would be suffering as the heat of the sun would so scorch the earth and there would be a lack of water and so forth.
QUESTION: (From South Africa) We always read and understand that the flood was world wide. They always quote Genesis 7:21-23 and Chapter 10:32 where it talks about the earth being divided after the flood according to their nations. These are the families after their generations, sons of Noah, in their nations. And by these were the nations of the earth divided.
ANSWER: The concept that the flood covered the whole earth is an ecclesiastic concept. But basically the ‘flood’ of Noah’s time did not comer the whole earth. The word in Hebrew for earth is Eretz which means that place or all that country. So this was the area of the country where Noah and his family were ordered to build the Ark. Of course they were the last and purest strain of the Adamic Race left in that area, at that time, in the Upper Tarim Basin which was north of Turkestan at that time. (In the high Himalaya Mountains). This area of that country shows the effects of that flood to this day. It is a great upper valley several hundred miles long, but there was also an underground sea under that area. The great pillar of rock which held up the surface was broken by a great earthquake and the land fell into the water. But you can see some of these pillars of rock still standing today, and see how they collapsed. At the same time water fell from above, and all in all, this basin filled up and the foundations of the deep were thus uncovered at the same time and the Ark floated. But this is the place where the flood of Noah’s time occurred, and the water rose up to the high mountains of that area. Ararat means high mountain. Thus the mountain of this basin had water up to the rim of the basin. And then another great earthquake came at both ends of the basin and cracked it open and the water ran out. One end of the water ran down into China, because this was the dividing line of the drainage of the earth. Water went down through the Wang Ho river of China. And at the other end it went to the west. Then finally down through the area where lay the City of Ur of the Chaldea. And then emptied into the sea. When the earthquake came, one can see where the water poured out through this rift, and out of this great fault and then descended into these two areas.
QUESTION: (tape audience) asking for an explanation of the 82nd Psalm. For there seems to be some confusion in it.
ANSWER: Not really. The 82nd Psalm is probably the most important passage in the scripture as it relates to the identity of the Divine Household in the earth. It deals with a conversation which God gives through David to the Elect.
“God standeth in the congregation of the mighty, he judgeth among the Gods”, then “Hear O Israel the LORD thy God is ONE LORD” and “Is there any gods beside me, no I know not any.” All of these things God through out the writings of Isaiah and other places is talking about pagan gods, all mythological gods who are no gods. But when God standeth in the congregation of the mighty among the Gods, then the word is Elohim. This then makes sense, because this is a conversation YAHWEH the eternal God had with the Elohim. Here is the Eternal father speaking to his offspring, then they are thus Elohim, or Gods. Therefore they have a divine quality, so YAHWEH speaks in the congregation of the Mighty and judgeth among the Elohim, and He said: -“How long will you judge unjustly and accept the person of the wicked?” The Elohim are those of the Adamic race who came to earth, and then fell in the Luciferian fall, as this race bowed to temptation and cunning. But they did not lose their Sonship by this process, they are still the issue of the MOST HIGH GOD. They are still the children whom He has begotten. Come over to the book of Isaiah where God talks about how he created the Universe, and all therein, and then makes this statement concerning His sons; “Thus saith YAHWEH the holy one of Israel, the master of Israel, “Ask me concerning my sons”. In this declaration he makes this statement about His sons, and then in the 82nd., Psalm he says: “How long will you accept the persons of the wicked? And he tells them that since they are sons, then act like sons and defend the poor, and the needy, the fatherless; do justice to the afflicted, and rid them of the hands of the wicked.
QUESTION: In the past few weeks there has been some changes in the teaching of the Catholic theology. After 940 years, it is now alright for Catholics to eat meat on Friday, except for Good Friday. The question is from Catholic ministers who find themselves at a loss. They find that after many years of instructions that this was a sin, more than this many have done penitence for breaking this law under the areas of business engagements and other patterns. So is it or is it not a biblical conjuncture that they could or could not eat meat on Friday? Or did the church bring this law entirely on church authority? And if so, why did they relinquish it after 940 years of the historic practice of this?
ANSWER: Well, the only answer is that it had no biblical foundation what so ever. It had no Biblical instruction, was never commanded of God, had no spiritual value what so ever. It had been built to its significance by the Church, and its Priesthood to keep areas of symbolism attached to their religion. It was designed as St. Thomas Aquinis was so careful in explaining, that since Christ was crucified on Friday, this involved the shedding of blood, so no meat would be eaten on Friday. This being a decision of the church because the eating of meat required the shedding of blood. Since Christ was crucified then no animal whose blood was shed would be devoured on Friday. That this had a certain spiritual value and the church through great revelation had come to this area of instruction. This isn’t something which is 1900 years old, it is less than 1000 years since the edict has been made, and Penitence and church judgments were placed on the violations of this declaration.