This book originally published in 1754 was in both English and Spanish with both languages within the same volume, with odd numbered pages in Spanish, the even numbers being in English..
In the period when this volume was published spelling was quite variable and to make matters more difficult from a republishing point of view it was printed with old English-Gothic type set, so had to be reproduced by a combination of OCR (optical character recognition) and voice recognition of dictated text. So for this reason, the text in this book is not exactly as the original although every endeavour has been made to retain the old spelling where possible.
THE FOLLOWING ARE HANDPICKED QUOTES FROM THROUGHOUT THE BOOK “A Short Study of Esau-Edom in Jewry” by British author C. F Lewis. The entire book is also provided here for download. Whenever these quotes refer to the Bible, the scriptural passage is also quoted for convenience. Page numbers from the Lewis book are provided. This study “fills in the gaps” of other essays on this website by proving with scripture and quotes from historians, ancient and modern, how Esau-Edom is to be found in modern Jewry. We are now living in what may be called “The age of Esau-Edom”, since Zionist anti-Christ Jews are the predominant political, economic, academic and religious force on the planet.
All of this they have achieved by usury, corporate monopolization, mass media propaganda, economic fraud and skimming at all levels, mass murder, assassination of key political figures, wars by proxy, nepotism and self-promotion, secret societies, mass immigration schemes against white nations and a plethora of other fine-tuned tactics (all outlined in the Protocols … of Zion) for which their satanic mentality is ideally equipped. According to Yahweh God, the seed of Edom “is spoiled”.
WHERE DID THE WELSH CYMRY COME FROM? Just as HOSEA married a wife named “GOMER” (Hos.1:3), so also it was during the reign of King HOSHEA that Israel first went into captivity as GHOMRI. Micah 6:15 condemns the northern Israelites for keeping the “statutes of OMRI.” OMRI in Hebrew begins with the consonant “Agin,” formerly called “Gayin” which was pronounced with a gutteral “H,” that is “Gh” or “Kh.” The Israelites would have pronounced OMRI as “GHOMRI” which became “KHUMRI” in Assyrian. “GIMIRI” was the Babylonian way of pronouncing CIMMERIANS or Scythians (Tomb of Darius; Behistun Rock in Persia).
OMRI was evidently a strong king. The Assyrians called Israel after his name, BIT OMRI (Khumri)” (1968 edition, p.44 Langer’s Encyc. of World History; Moabite Stone). He built Samaria the capital of the Ten Tribes (1 Ki. 16:25). Some scholars have suggested that KIMMERIM refers to “idolatrous” (KEMARIM) Israelites. On Shalmaneser’s Black Obelisk, Jehu , king of Israel, is called “son of OMRI” (880 B.C.)
THE ORIGINS OF THE HISTORIES OF THE FRENCH-SPEAKING COUNTRIES, as those of all the nations of the world, represent an insoluble mystery for historians and ethnologists. They recognize frankly that the annals of ancient history are very obscure. “History doesn’t know the origin of any people” remarked Lenormant (“Ancient History of the Orient”, p. 234) adding that the further one attempts to delve into the past, the more obscure it becomes.
What then is the REASON? Better than anyone, Paul, “the apostle to the Gentiles”, can give us the answer in his epistle to the Romans, written under divine inspiration:
“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all un-righteousness and ungodliness of men, who hold the truth CAPTIVE, because that which may be-known of God is manifest to them; for God has showed it to them… they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.” (Rom. 1:18-21)
Unlike the theorems of geometry and mathematics, history, to such an extent as mankind has exposed it, has given us no reliable summary which will not be corrupted. Its knowledge is not only scanty, but also hypothetical. In the “Preface” of his work entitled “Encyclopaedia of World History”, Mr. Langer recognizes this gap and confirms the fact that a number of historical facts are themselves contested, and so little corroborated, that they could never establish the basis of any definite testimony.
History, therefore, has no POINT OF DEPARTURE. It ignores that there is a source, or rather it rejects it firmly, as we are going to see. Consequently, having no one dtfinite source from which it can draw its pieces of information with the desired assurance, the historian tends to speak of the “possible” and of the “probable”. But this possible and this probable, by the admission of Jubainville “holds a LARGER AND LARGER PLACE which is increased proportionally as the number of centuries which separate us: from the events.(“The First Inhabitants of Europe”, p. VIII)
We live in an age in which man has no fear of considering “obsolete” every work or treatise, or any knowledge that is not the product of the present generation–including the BIBLE! Thus, history is doubly vulnerable, for not only does it miss necessary clues, but as well, since it refuses to consider the biblical date of the creation of man, its chronology becomes almost entirely a myth!
History, as historians tell it, depends exclusively on scientific knowledge acquired by men through the ages. To cite an example, bibliography, palaeography, archaeology, chronology, palaeontology, etc. are some sciences related to History; because their principles change with the course of civilization, History, in turn, remains SUBJECT TO REVISION, if not always unexpected, at least sometimes radical.
This study is to show that the Frisians are descendants of the tribe of Issachar, one of the Lost Ten Tribes. Many books have been written about the nations of north-western Europe to be of Israelite descent in general, and Great Britain (Ephraim) and the United States of America (Manasseh) to be Joseph in particular.
There are many parallels between the Celts, who surfaced in Europe from about 600 BC onwards, and the ten tribed northern House of Israel (also called Ephraim and Samaria), which was taken into Assyrian captivity from 721 to 718 BC, and which broke loose from their captors, after the fall of the Assyrian Empire to the Babylonians (609 BC).
The Celts are the descendants of the House of Israel, Samaria, Bit Khumri (Assyrian for Beth Omri, the House of Omri), hence ‘Khymri’ or ‘Cimmerians’. There is quite an astonishing, analogy between the Northern House of Israel with their levites/priests on the one hand and the Celts and Druids on the other.
Among the Celts, the Druids were the only teachers of religion, like the priests/Levites were in Israel. The Druids offered sacrifices, like the priests did in Israel. Among pagan nations it is normally the civil government which judges criminals, especially so in murder cases. This was not so among the Celts. The Druids, and not the kings or heads of tribes, decided about life and death, as did the priests in Israel.
Like the priests, the Druids had their high priest. Like the priests and Levites, the Druids were in charge of religion. Another strong link is the fact that both Levites in Israel and Druids among the Celts were exempt from military service and paying taxes.
The Celts seemed to have raised commemorative stone monuments like the Israelites and the oak tree played a significant role in the lives of both the Celts and the idolatrous Israelites of the Northern Kingdom.
The Celts had special feasts in May and October, a corruption of the feasts of the Eternal (Lev 23).
The Celtic day started at sunset – as it did in Israel – and the Celtic year started, according to certain historians, in autumn – as the year still does with the Jews.
The most gruesome analogy is the one of human sacrifices. For this reason Julius Ceasar considered the Celts barbaric and it was one of the reasons for God to drive the Ten Tribes out of the promised land. Could it be that Baal and Moloch. the gods the Israelites worshipped, were in essence the same as the Celtic gods Belenos (Baal) and Lug (Mo-loch)? Human sacrifices were made to both (Mo)loch and Lug.
THE KNIGHTS AT THEIR TOURNAMENTS, IN THEIR FINERY, ARMOUR AND EMBLEMS OF ANCESTRY, believed they were the foremost warriors in the world, while Mongol warriors thought otherwise. Mongol horses were small, but their riders were lightly clad and they moved with greater speed. These were hardy men who grew up on horses and hunting, making them better warriors than those who grew up in agricultural societies and cities. Their main weapon was the bow and arrow. And the Mongols of the early 1200’s were highly disciplined, superbly coordinated and brilliant in tactics.
The Mongols were illiterate, religiously shamanistic and sparsely populated, perhaps no more than around 700,000 in number, living in good-sized felt tents. They were herdsmen around an area called Karakorum. They had been moving across great distances on the grassy plains — steppe lands — north and east of China, frequently fighting wars over turf. Before 1200 they had been fragmented, with various tribes fighting one another — their divisions encouraged by neighbors such as the Ruzhen (Jin) of northern Manchuria, who wished to see the Mongols remain weak.
In the late 1100’s and early 1200’s a Mongol military leader named Temujin (Temüjin) was creating a confederation of tribes, Mongol and non-Mongol but which would be called Mongol. He was a good manager, collecting under him people of talent. And, when necessary, he warred. In 1202 his forces fought and defeated the Tatars to his immediate east. He had no hope of them, so he put the surviving men to the sword and distributed the women and children among other tribes.
IN THE PRESENT DAY, ALTHOUGH ENGLAND, SCOTLAND, WALES AND IRELAND STILL MAINTAIN devotion each to its own Patron Saint, St. George has come to represent in a general way Britain—the British Isles.
As a result of research by hagiographers and historians, no competent authority now doubts the fact of the historic George of Lydda. The accounts of miracle-working incidents and fabulous tales tenaciously held by the popular mind in medieval times are, in our day, so manifestly unreal that modern sceptics, having missed established facts, scarcely escape the temptation to relegate all that pertains to St. George, both truth and fiction, to the realm of the mythical.
While rejecting the legendary accretions which have accumulated in great profusion around the simple story of his life, an effort has been made in the following pages to bring together the historical notices of St. George to be found in British annals and elsewhere.
It should be made clear to the reader that there was another George with whom our Patron Saint is often confused. C. J. Marcus says: “Gibbon identifies St. George with the disreputable George of Cappadocia—a case of mistaken identity which has persisted ever since.” Mommsen also: “The historian Edward Gibbon did the character of the saint much harm. Gibbon confounded two wholly distinct men, George who was born in Epiphania in Cilicia, and George of Lydda”; and Hepworth Dixon on the same theme: “We have had two St. Georges in history and to our shame we have made them one, and we have been indolently content to let our greatest historical writer, Gibbon, describe him as one of the vilest scamps and darkest villains who ever stained this earth with crime.”
12 Individual Named Giants Mentioned in the Bible
Early ancestor of all the giant clans in what became the region of Palestine, which included the Anakites, Emites, and Horites (Deut 2:10-12; 2 Sam 21:16,18,20,22; 1 Chron 20:4,6,8)
Father of a clan of giants living southern Cannaan (Num 13:28)
Forefather of Anak and the Anakim (Josh 15:13; 21:11)
Honoured as “the greatest man among the Anakites” (Josh 14:15)
The Anakite name for Hebron was Kiriath-Arba meaning “City of Arba” (Josh 15:13)
Because Debir was an Anakite city like Hebron (Josh 11:21), and because the former Anakite name for Debir was Kiriath-Sepher meaning “City of Sepher,” it must be that Sepher was the name of another Anakite patriarch like Arba (Josh 15:15)
The king of Bashan identified as the last of “the Rephaites” (Deut 3:11) ……..
THE ALLENS, OR ALANS, OR ALANI, first enter Western written history through the reports of Roman military commanders and through Roman plays and literature. The “Alani”, as the Romans referred to them collectively, were a tribe of nomadic people living near the Aral Sea in what is today the southern Ukraine. Like their neighbours, their life revolved around their flocks and herds, which grazed the rich native grasses of the region. The men and boys spent almost every waking hour on horseback, training to defend their camp from predators of the two-legged or the four-legged variety.
Women and small children stayed close to the tribal camp, which consisted of a collection of two-wheeled ox-carts which carried each family’s possessions, and in which the family slept during stormy weather. Most of the neighbouring tribes lived in tents of skins, and migrated as a group on horseback, and thus could migrate faster, but were limited in what they could carry; the Alani moved slower, keeping pace with their flocks of sheep and cattle.
While most of their neighbours were short, with dark hair and olive complexions, the Alani stood out as being tall, blond, fair-skinned, and in the eyes of the Roman officers looking for new recruits, a handsome and likely group. The Alani also had a unique fighting style; rather than the short bow and short sword of the typical Steppe fighter, the Alani favoured the long wooded lance for frontal attack, and the very heavy two-handed “Barbarian” sword strapped across his back for “close work”
MANY HAVE HEARD, AND ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH, THE TERMS “IRISH” AND “SCOTTISH”, and really don’t know the difference between the two. The Irish and Scots are really the same people except they arrived in Britain two thousand years apart. The ancestors of the Irish arrived in Britain about 1600 B.C., while the Scots arrived about 501 A.D. It is simply amazing that two groups of the same people would wander through the earth and end up locating within a few miles from each other two thousand years later in Britain. Because there are two different groups of the same peoples concerned here, we will have to treat them separately even though they came from the same family. We will first investigate the background of the Irish.
The Irish are a very ancient people, and their history covers a large span of time. If we will take the time to do a little arithmetic, we will soon see we are talking about approximately 3,500 years or better. With the United States being 223 years old (1999), you can see the Irish history is about 18 times as old as we are. When one considers all the things that have happened since 1776, it is staggering to imagine what has happened to the Irish people over a period of 3,500 years.
THERE HAS ALWAYS BEEN A BROTHERHOOD OF ADEPTS, the Great White Brotherhood; there have always been Those who knew, Those who possessed this inner wisdom, and our Masters are among the present representatives of that mighty line of Seers and Sages. Part of the knowledge, which They have garnered during countless æons is available to every one on the physical plane tinder the name of Theosophy. But there is far more behind. The Master Kuthumi Himself once said smilingly, when someone spoke of the enormous change that the Theosophical knowledge had made in our lives, and of the wonderful comprehensiveness of the doctrine of reincarnation : “Yes, but we have only lifted a very small corner of the veil as yet.” When we have thoroughly assimilated the knowledge given us, and are all living up to its teaching, the Brotherhood will be ready to lift the veil further ; but only when we have complied with those conditions.
THE BALTIC REPUBLICS OF FINLAND AND ESTONIA are among the most northerly inhabited countries in the world. They share much with their Nordic neighbours: Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Like other Nordics, Finns and Estonians are egalitarian and democratic. They are also winners in the new global economy. Finland in the early 2000’s was rated the most competitive economy on earth. Estonia, having endured a half-century of Communism has now become the free-market showplace of the Soviet Union.
Finland and Estonia are curiosities. Ethnically, many Finns and Estonians resemble Swedes and Danes, but most of them do not speak a Germanic or Indo-European language. Finnish and Estonian belong to the Finno-Ugric or Ural-Altaic language family, related distantly to Turkish and Hungarian. In spite of their Nordic democratic traditions and high levels of wealth and literacy both countries have endured long centuries of servitude imposed upon them by the realities of geography and history.
There is a clue to the paradox of Finnish/Estonian history. During World War II General Mannerheim led the Finnish army in two separate conflicts against the Soviet Union. Astonishingly, he addressed them as ‘Men of Issachar’!
Could there be a connection between the people of Finland and their Estonian cousins and a tiny, supposedly extinct, tribe of ancient Israel.
Issachar was the youngest son of Jacob’s wife Leah, born not long after his brother Zebulun. Leah named him Yissakar, which meant ‘he will bring a reward’, which derived from sachar, which meant ‘payment’. Leah named her last son this because she had to hire Jacob to sleep with her!
WHEN JACOB (ISRAEL) GAVE HIS DYING BLESSING TO HIS TWELVE SONS, he associated each of them with some animal, object or personal characteristic which afterwards became the emblem of the tribe descended from him. Among these the LION, the emblem of Jacob’s fourth son Judah, is of special importance. This lion, in a couchant (lying down) position, became the emblem of the tribe of Judah; then, in a passant position, it became the emblem of the Camp or Brigade of Judah. Later, with the addition of a crown, it became the emblem of the Royal House and the throne of Judah. Still later, in a rampant (standing on the hind legs with both forelegs elevated) posture and with a crown, it became the symbol of the two-tribed House and Kingdom of Judah.
Yet this lion, usually portrayed as tawny or golden in colour, is not the only emblem of the descendants of Judah — or even the only lion!
In the last four verses of Genesis 38, we find recorded the birth of twin sons to Jacob’s fourth son Judah. Notice what these verses say:
Now it came to pass, at the time for giving birth, that behold, twins were in her womb. And so it was, when she was giving birth, that the one put out his hand; and the midwife took a scarlet thread and bound it on his hand, saying, “This one came out first.” Then it happened, as he drew back his hand that his brother came out unexpectedly; and she said, “How did you break through? This breach be upon you!” Therefore his name was called Perez. Afterwards his brother came out who had the scarlet thread on his hand. And his name was called Zerah [Zarah].
From its inception, the Israel Movement has been almost exclusively preoccupied with the identification of the leading birthright tribes, the House of Joseph and the Sceptre of Judah in the House of David. This can be readily understood. Following the expiration of the “seven times” of Israel’s chastisement and exile, the preponderance of history, both Biblical and secular, projects the leading tribes in Israel onto the world scene. However, it should never be overlooked that the Lord’s Covenants, both old and new, are with the whole House of Israel and, notwithstanding the fact that during this present interim, responsibility for establishing the nucleus of the Kingdom of God rests upon the House of Joseph, and ultimately the whole house of Jacob-Israel will become the Kingdom of our Lord at His coming. Thus in fulfilling the commission to preach this Gospel of the Kingdom to all the nations, we must not fail our kinsmen who comprise whole nations and many segments of Israel who remain on the Continent of Europe.
The Lord God of hosts had declared through the prophet Amos:
“For, to, I will command, and I will sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth.” (Amos 9: 9.)
A study of the migrations will show that Israel’s westward trek moved slowly across the continent with the main body of the captivity, those who travelled overland, taking more than a thousand years to reach central Europe. In the wake of this “Great Migration,” there were left behind pockets of people, racial influences and rear guards of liberty.
THE QUESTION IS, WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF FRANCE IN Bible prophecy? In the main France is descended from the Israelite tribe of Reuben. In France there are also minorities from the tribes of Simeon and Gad. This is well documented in the book “The Tribes” by Yair Davidy”.
To have an understanding of France prophetically it is necessary to understand Reuben. Reuben was the firstborn son of Jacob through Leah. Jacob had two wives Leah and Rachel. But Jacob loved Rachel more than Leah. “And when the LORD saw that Leah was hated, he opened her womb: but Rachel was barren. And Leah conceived, and bare a son, and she called his name Reuben: for she said, Surely the LORD hath looked upon my affliction; now therefore my husband will love me” (Genesis 29:31, 32). Reuben means ‘see a son’. It was in the environment when Leah felt unloved by her husband and as a consequence was afflicted that Reuben was born.
Reuben was born in the environment of Leah’s emotional turmoil. As a consequence Reuben became an unstable person. According to Genesis 49:4 Reuben is „unstable as water’. After Rachel Jacob’s second wife was buried “Israel (Jacob) journeyed, and spread his tent beyond the tower of Edar. And it came to pass, when Israel dwelt in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father’s concubine: and Israel heard it” (Gen 35:21, 22). This was an abomination before the LORD. This failure by Reuben as the eldest son to properly look after and protect all the remaining members of Jacob’s family while he was away but instead fornicated with his father’s concubine was to later disqualify him from the birthright.
Date: May 27, 2013
An Expose’ Documenting the Cabal of Phony White Patriots and False Teachers Claiming To Be Christian Identity While Aiding and Abetting ZOG Via the Tactic of Divide and Conquer
“The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity, nor speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth.” – Zeph. 3:13.
“They hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of Yahweh: they would none of my counsel. They despised my reproof. Therefore they shall eat of the fruit of their own way and be filled with their own devices.” – Prov. 1:29-31.
Woe to them that devise iniquity, and work evil upon their beds! When the morning is light, they practice it, because it is in the power of their hand. And they covet fields, and take them by violence; and houses, and take them away: so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage. – Micah 2:1-2.
“If the Jew is present, your dreams will never come true.” – Eustace Mullins
Introduction: Crisis in Identity
“Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever commiteth sin is the servant of sin.”- John 8:34.
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through–-all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” – Marcus Tullius Cicero
This essay has been composed as a public service to Christian Israel, because Scripture tells us to expose criminals who operate in our midst. (2 Tim. 3:1-5.) A crisis has emerged within our ranks, which has been brought about primarily by Mr. William Finck, who, as a supposed member of our Faith, has used every form of deceit and guile to defame those with whom he disagrees. Rather than confine himself to rational debate, Mr. Finck has, for quite some time, descended to the level of ad hominem attack, rumour-mongering and back-stabbing.
WHERE IS RUSSIA IDENTIFIED IN THE BIBLE? Many people believe that Russia is Gog of Ezekiel 38, but studying the prophecy of Ezekiel and history proves that not to be true. Can Russia be traced back to the book of Beginnings, the book of Genesis? Absolutely! And, I believe that the identity of Russia has been one of the best kept secrets next to the identity of the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel that has ever been uncovered!
Origins of the Russian People
The “present day Russians Ukrainians; and Belarusians-[are] the ancestors of the eastern Slavs” (The Making of Modern Russia, Lionel Kochan, John Keep, p.2). There was one original group called the Slavs, but then they all split into three groups, “by AD 800, three main geographical and linguistic divisions had arisen; the East Slavs inhabiting a large part of European Russia, the South Slavs who settled in the Balkan Peninsula, and the West Slavs who settled in what is now Poland, Czechoslovakia and East Germany” (History Of Poland Mieczyslaw Kasprzyk Chapter one, emphasis added). Where did these Eastern Slavic people come from?
It has long been generally understood by many Russian academics that much of their population is descended from a branch of the Scythians. A famous Russian poet, Alexander Blok, for example, noted such in one of his poems, The Scythians (Blok 1970 : 161). Also, Russian historian Alekseyev, in his work, In Search Of Our Ancestors, writes that the Russians are a branch of the Scythians (Alekseyev 1972 : 297).
THERE is no direct history connecting the tribe of Asher to the Belgian people. We are talking about one of the lost tribes. Even the Caucasian population of Wallonia comes from various backgrounds. One can compare this with Jewry. The Jewish people have known many proselytes. Yet there has been a core of the tribe of Judah (and some of Levi & Benjamin) over the past 2500 years. The core passes on characteristics and genes to the periphery. Looking at the ‘prophetic clues’ one has to conclude that a core of the tribe of Asher once found its way to the people living in Belgium and Luxemburg (especially in the triangle Roermond-Lille-Nancy-Roermond). This core passed on its characteristics and genes to the influx of others. The more fulfilled prophetic clues we find, the stronger our case. What follows is not historic proof, but proof by revelation.
THERE IS NO DIRECT HISTORY connecting the tribe of Reuben to the French people. We are talking about one of the lost tribes. Even the French Caucasian population comes from various backgrounds. One can compare this with Israelites. These people have known many proselytes, yet, there has been a core of the tribe of Judah (and some of Levi & Benjamin) over the past 2500 years. The core passes on characteristics and genes to the periphery. Looking at the ‘prophetic clues’, one has to conclude that a core of the tribe of Reuben once found its way to the two northern thirds of (Celtic) France. This core passed on its characteristics and genes to the influx of others. Just to make it easy we will talk about the French, although the southern third of France (le Midi) most likely does not belong to the lost tribes. The more fulfilled prophetic clues we find, the stronger our case. What follows is not historic proof, but proof by revelation.
And when the LORD SAW (va-yar – וירא), that Leah was hated, he opened her womb: but Rachel was barren. And Leah conceived, and bare A SON (ben – בן and she called his name REUBEN ) r’eu-ven – see, (a) son – ראובן (for she said, Surely the LORD hath LOOKED ) ra’a – ראה ( upon my affliction; now therefore MY HUSBAND (my man, ishi – אישי (will love me (Gen 29:31-32, KJV throughout, unless mentioned otherwise).
THE FOLLOWING PAGES were first read as a paper before the “Société d’Etudes Ethnographiques.”They have since been amplified and are now being published at the request of a number of friends, who believe that the public should have an opportunity of judging whether or not “the Armenian Question” has another side than that which has been recently so assiduously promulgated throughout the Western World.
Though the championship of Greek, Bulgarian and other similar “Christian, civilized methods of fighting,” as contrasted with “Moslem atrocities” in the Balkans and Asia Minor, has been so strenuously undertaken by Lord Bryce and others, the more recent developments in the Near East may perhaps already have opened the eyes of a great many thinking people to the realization that, in sacrificing the traditional friendship of the Turk to all this more or less sectarian clamour, British diplomacy has really done nothing better than to exchange the solid and advantageous reality for a most elusive and unreliable, if not positively dangerous, set of shadows.
It seems illogical that the same party which recalled the officials (and among them our present War Minister) appointed by Lord Beaconsfield to assist the Turkish Government in reforming their administration and collecting the revenue in Asia Minor, and which on the advent of the Young Turks refused to lend British Administrators to whom ample and plenary powers were assured, should now, in its eagerness to vilify the Turk, lose sight of their own mistakes which have led in the main to the conditions of which it complains, and should so utterly condemn its own former policy.
Whatever hardships the Armenians may within recent years have suffered, the responsibility for them must surely to a great extent rest with the well-meaning idealists who, instead of trying to improve existing conditions, inspired their helpless dupes with impracticable aspirations which were bound to lead to disaster.
The writer desires to thank those authors and travellers whose works he has so freely quoted, and upon whose information he has relied for the historical and geographical notes, as well as Professor Henry Leon, Mr. Robert Fraser, and other friends, who have afforded him their most valuable assistance.
The reasons for dealing with the subject at this particular juncture are given in the text and will, he hopes, prove satisfactory to the reader.
AMONG THE PEOPLES OF AUSTRIA-HUNGARY the Jewish people stands first in importance. It is not usually enumerated among the Hapsburg “nationalities,” though the Zionist movement has brought into being a Jewish National Organization which was represented in the Parliament of 1907 by two Zionist deputies and by a politician who was described as a “Moderate Israelite.” In Statistical Year Books the Jews figure only as a “denomination.” Numerically they appear to be less considerable than the Germans, the Magyars, the Czechs, the Poles, the Ruthenes, the Serbo-Croatians, the Rumanes, and only surpass, with their official religious total of 2,300,000, the Slovenes and the Italians. Economically, politically and in point of general influence they are, however, the most significant element in the Monarchy.
No foreign observer of Austro-Hungarian affairs can close his eyes to the Jewish question, however much he may seek to ignore it or to “beg” it by adopting an unreasoning philo-semitic or anti-semitic attitude. The greatest obstacle to a comprehension of the terms of the problem is the difficulty of obtaining precise and reliable information. It is far easier to get at the truth of the Czech-German question in Bohemia, of the Slav-Italian question in Dalmatia and Istria, and even of the complicated struggle between Magyars and non-Magyars in Hungary, than to ascertain the merits of the Jewish question. Other ethnico-religious issues are local and special. They can usually be expressed in terms of language, creed, or of avowed political aspiration. The Jewish question is universal and elusive
“(God) will destroy … the covering cast over all people, and the veil that is spread over all nations.” Isaiah 25:7
“Neither cast ye your pearls be/ore swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.“ Matt 7:6
THE SONS OF JACOB SEE ONLY TWO RACES IN THE WORLD; “Jacob” and “Esau”. The Sons of Jacob were appointed kings and priests. Esau was cursed and branded a murderer and deceiver.
Esau sent his merchants to Jacob who traded his pearls for Esau’s pretty ge-gaws in violation of God’s Law. The merchants returned to Esau with Jacob’s pearls. Seeing Jacob’s pearls he wanted more.
Esau united and in a generation conquered an empire; built a nearly invincible army; and built a fleet that destroyed the fleet of a world-renowned European power in a day.
Following is history that is now hid from view but should be pondered as Jacob continues his Lawless affair with Esau.
For proof that the Pharisees are today’s Jews let us first see what the Jews, themselves, have to say on the subject.
Universal Jewish Encyclopaedia, page 474,”The Jewish religion, as it is today, traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of their literature; the study which is essential for a real understanding of Pharisaism.
From Encyclopaedia Judaica – Rabbi Louis Finkelstein was chosen by the Kehilla (Jewish community) as one of the top- 120 Jews who best represent “a lamp of Judaism to the world. ” He headed the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York. (One of his star Pupils was former Chief Justice Earl Warren; see Who’s Who in America.
We quote from Finkelstein’s two volume work, “The Pharisees.” “Pharisaism became Talmudism, but the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies. From Pakistan to Babylonia, from’ Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from there to Poland, Russia and eastern Europe generally,” ancient Pharisaism has wandered. “
THE SCRIPTURES SPEAK AT LENGTH OF ISRAELITES, Edomites. Jews, Pharisees, and Sadducees. Today’s preachers plead stupidity. This is their excuse for preaching “positive thinking” in place of the WORD. They say nothing about SADDUCEES. Mention of the ongoing war of the Sadducee against their ancient enemy – the WORD – never passes their lips. If it did, their listeners would tar and feather them.
Israel Into Captivity
1: Millions of Israelites taken into captivity. 2: The captivity. 3: Israel flees through Turkey. Some leave by the Black Sea and go onto the Danube and the Russian rivers where they are known as Goths. Some cross the Caucasus Mountains and are known by its name, and some move overland and are known as Scythians and Saxons. 4: Less than 50.000 of Judea return to rebuild the temple.
Please note that this is a translation from Ria’s notes for a lecture given in German to an assembly of Christian brothers gathered in Bad Teinach on 30th October 2007, for a 5 day conference, the theme of which was The House of Judah and the House of Israel, and is not a verbatim word for word translation as given in the
In the beginning was the Word. In our study into what happened to the tribe of Levi it is first necessary to study the Hebrew alphabet which has great significance in respect to the tribe of Levi. The Hebrew alphabet, as well as having numerical values, each letter also represents an object.
Third Letter of the Alphabet
With the third letter of the Hebrew alphabet, we think of oneness – Father, Son and Holy Ghost. This letter named camel in numerical value is 113 (3+40+40+30), which is connected with worship, praise and hope. Psalm 113 clearly shows these attributes. Let us now read this Psalm:
Please note that this is a translation from notes for a lecture given in German to an assembly of Christian brothers gathered in Bad Teinach on 30th October 2007, for a 5 day conference, the theme of which was The House of Judah and the House of Israel, and is not a verbatim translation of the lecture
Each of the sons of Israel had a banner, therefore the offspring of the sons of Jacob, who are the tribes of Israel must still be under their respective individual tribal banners. In Numbers 2:2, we read: “Every man of the children of Israel shall pitch by his own standard, with the ensign of their father’s house: far off about the tabernacle of the congregation shall they pitch.”
It is interesting that out of 16 German states, 7 banners have the emblem of the lion, also to be considered is the national emblem of the Eagle, which has the meaning of speed and being led of God.
Genesis 49, 8:12 gives us the marks of Judah:
8 Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies; thy father’s children shall bow down before thee.
9 Judah is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?
10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
WHEN ONE APPROACHES BRITISH-ISRAEL TEACHING FOR THE FIRST TIME, the question most likely to arise is, “If we are Israel, why are we so unlike the Jews?” A straightforward and brief answer to this obvious question would be, “Because most of the Jews are not really Israelites.” Such a reply would be correct but hopelessly puzzling to most people, unless followed immediately by a detailed account of the respective histories of the separate and distinct kingdoms of Israel and Judah. The identity of the Jews is bound up with the history of the tribe of Judah, which is so complex in its divisions as to demand a separate study.
The Independent Tribe
The tribe of Judah appears to have shown its independence from the time of Jacob onward. Among the patriarch’s sons, Judah seems to have been leader. The older sons had been dismissed from the birthright responsibility because of weaknesses that disqualified them: Reuben was morally unstable; Simeon and Levi had shown cruel traits of character. Judah, who was evidently of attractive appearance, assumed the position of leadership. He acted as spokesman for the sons of Jacob and he seems to have held the “sceptre”, or rod of office, significant of leadership.
There is good reason for believing that there was such a rod of office in the Hebrew family from the earliest times and its possession by Judah was confirmed in the divinely inspired promise given to his family by Jacob, “The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come.” The promise is a long one and we will not deal with the many other details here, but it is evident that Judah was being singled out for rulership, though the throne was not to be seen in Israel until many generations later.
Please note that this is a translation from Ria’s notes for a lecture given in German to an assembly of Christian brothers gathered in Bad Teinach on 30th October 2007, for a 5 day conference, the theme of which was The House of Judah and the House of Israel, and is not a verbatim word for word translation as given in the lecture.
Dear children of God and Israelites, my lecture is about God’s dealings in earthly affaires and is based on the Bible. God’s word is life and it gives life if we hear and believe through conviction by the Holy Spirit.
Is there actually a method whereby we can find out where Israel’s tribes live today?
The methodology is to study both the Bible and secular history together as the prophecies given for every tribe should indeed enable them to be identified through historical evidence.
ZOG is rarely mentioned in public – and small wonder.
The notion that a semi-secret organization can be powerful enough to seize control of America is nothing but an outrageous flight of fancy. Since all respected experts agree that ZOG is a phantom threat, only minimal space need be wasted on a definition:
Zionist: Someone who will sacrifice any person, anything, or any nation for the greater good of Israel.
Occupational: Possession by force, rather than by voluntary agreement.
Government: Control of a population.
In different words, ZOG refers to a mythical situation in which people with supreme allegiance to Israel rather than America have seized power here, and now rule us.
ZOG: Myth or Reality?
Despite repeated attacks upon it, ZOG somehow keeps rising from the ashes and rubble – much like the harmless old myth of Atlantis. Of course, whether or not Atlantis once existed, it now belongs to history. The scarcity of hard evidence verifying claims of a Lost Continent is always excused by the calamity that befell it, plus the enormous length of time that has since passed.
ALMOST everyone who reads the Holy Bible will agree that it was written by, to, and about Israelites. Isn’t it surprising then, to realize that the race that reads, prints, and distributes the Holy Bible, and claims it as its divinely-inspired religious book, is not the Jews, who most ministers insist are the Israelites, but is instead the people of Europe (and as they have spread to America, Australia, New Zealand, etc)? Is it possible the Jews are not Israelites after all, but that instead you folks, whose ancestors came from Europe are the true descendants of the Israelites? What a different picture that would make of the Bible, of current history, and prophecy!
ON OCTOBER 30, 1995, THE PEOPLE OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA, voted in a province-wide referendum. Its purpose was to determine the political destiny of Quebec vis-à-vis the rest of Canada. A “yes” vote would have meant that Quebec would become an independent sovereign state. As it happened, 50.6% of those voting chose to remain with Canada, only 1.2% more than those voting for independence — a difference of less than 50,000 votes out of an eligible 4.8 million . Yet the sovereignty referendum, the second in Quebec’s history, was only one example of the political tensions that have existed between Quebec and the rest of Canada for decades. Another vote in the “neverendum” process is likely.
Who are these passionate people, the Québécois (Quebecers) whose leaders clamour for a sovereign state—who demand to be maîtres chez nous (“masters in our own house”) free of Canadian control? What is their ethnic or racial origin and their place in world history? To answer that their ancestors “came from France” is not sufficient. This work will reveal the origins of the francophone (native French-speaking) people known as the Québécois. Evidence will be adduced from secular and Biblical history that points to a surprising ancestry for these people. Speculation will also be offered as to their future, in light of their origins and history. First, however, a brief review is necessary, especially for non-Canadians reading this work, of their more accessible past.
ONE OF THE MOST BAFFLING QUESTIONS FACING CHRISTENDOM in the 20th Century revolves around the people we know as Jews. Who are they? Are they the Chosen People of the Bible, the seed of Abraham, to whom God gave the promise of Genesis 12-3 “I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee?” Or are they a heathen, satanic people who have been a “thorn in the flesh” of true Israel for centuries and who have a world plan for the destruction of Christianity?
Much of importance revolves around the proper answer to this question. The fundamentalist and evangelical Christian world, for the most part teach that the present day people who call themselves Jews are indeed the offspring of Abraham, “the friend of God,” and that to receive the blessings of God, Christians must help them in every way possible, even when they appear as the Apostle Paul stated in 1 Thessalonians 2:15, to be the murderers of their own prophets, persecutors of Christians, who “please not God and are contrary to all men.”
What saith the Holy Scriptures?
Being a treatise on the Bible account of Jesus’ death on Calvary’s Cross, and the true identity of those who hated and crucified our LORD.
WHO KILLED JESUS CHRIST??
IN ANY MURDER investigation, the authorities usually seek answers to the following questions:–
1. Were there any previous attempts to kill the deceased, and if so, by whom?
2. Had anyone shown hatred enough of the deceased that it might bring about a desire to kill him?
3. Had the deceased, prior to his death, named any who might kill him?
4. Who was last seen with the victim? Or who might have had him under their physical control?
5. What is the testimony of witnesses to the murder?